3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 846–942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 12:46
931
+65
4 Nov 2026, 00:11
866
+9
3 Nov 2026, 05:22
857
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 20 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
157.6%
avg views ÷ 931 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
6 (20 October 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
8,804
Reactions total
246
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 05:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
246 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5260646639026087738
78
31.7%
custom 5260347443014311529
60
24.4%
custom 5260598891874657054
33
13.4%
custom 5260288009256870067
20
8.13%
❤🔥
19
7.72%
❤
17
6.91%
custom 5260315836349982827
12
4.88%
😍
2
0.813%
😢
2
0.813%
😱
2
0.813%
😁
1
0.407%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Андрей с работы теперь в WB Chat!
Изначально мессенджер планировали использовать как корпоративный — для внутренних коммуникаций и продуктов. Недавно мы открыли доступ к нему для широкой аудитории. Сейчас есть возможность отправлять голосовые сообщения, фотографии и видео, проводить звонки 1-1 и создавать свои каналы.
С чего начиналось, узнали у Андрея, руководителя продукта WB Chat.
🔗 P. S. Скачать мессенджер мож…
Вакансии для тех, кто стоит на страже безопасности 🩷
Департамент информационной безопасности и противодействия мошенничеству защищает всю экосистему: маркетплейс, банк, мессенджер, аптеку и десятки внутренних сервисов.
Собрали пять открытых вакансий, под каждой есть пара слов о том, чем предстоит заниматься:
💜Kubernetes Security Engineer
Будете следить, чтобы в наших Kubernetes-кластерах всё было настроено как над…
Классно вышло 🩷
Это мы про наш проект «Выходные для многодетных семей». Получили за него награду «Лучшие социальные проекты России» в категории «Социально-ответственный работодатель».
Поддержка семей у нас устроена комплексно — в этом году мы объединили льготы и бонусы в единую программу. Рассказываем, что в неё входит.
#МыВRWB_делимся
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rwb_career. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мы в RWB” (@rwb_career), 931 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rwb_career.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
