Channel
@rwangga
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002813695799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rwangga |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rwangga |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 2 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 50.0% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@jedaif. azalea, pembawaan akun kamu sungguh tenang sekali. seperti ibu peri yang siap selalu ada untuk semua orang untuk menenangkan mereka, bisa di bilang ibu peri penenang. saya rasa kamu punya sisi yang lembut, halus, seperti kain sutra. hawanya seperti musim.. musim gugur? musim salju? intinya kamu cocok sekali menjadi teman pohon atau kamu cocok sekali dengan dominan warma hijau.
🎄1
@penwikmat. kJ, kenapa pfp kamu botak? namanya juga cukup 2 kata saja. agak bingung mendeskripsikan kamu. tapi saya rasa kamu memiliki aura yang anggun, baddas, dan panas. seperti perempuan dominan. memiliki hawa yang tegas, disiplin dan tidak ragu untuk mengatakan hal yang menurut kamu salah. begitu berkelas, tapi juga ada sisi lembut yang mungkin hanya orang-orang terdekat yang tau.
🔥1
@bkpkriukk. ipey, kamu punya aura yang berbahaya namun juga ada sisi lembut yang tersembunyi. saya rasa kamu orangnya ramah, baik hati, dan asik. punya kepribadian ganda.. mungkin? saya tidak tau. sosok kamu begitu menarik, elegant, khas sekali untuk orang sepertimu. begitu sexy dan elegant di saat bersamaan. ngomong' kamu pas sekali memperagakan ningning sebagai muse kamu.
❤1
@uDirga
😘1
@jedaif
🎄1
@unuyiL
🔥1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
👻 VALHORN EDITION — telegram.dog/lofiess first impression. = kesan pertama dari saya buat kamu, kamu begitu terlihat lembut jika dipandang. mempunyai jiwa mature. walaupun demikian, kamu juga sangat menggemaskan. ramah orangnya, begitu positif lingkungannya. dilihat' juga bucin sekali ya sama pacarnya? wkwk. pembawaan kamu tenang, jelas sekali ada buih-buih jamet dan alaynya. 3 word. = anggun, tenang, lokal. ship …
❤1
File, posted without a caption
😭1
👻 VALHORN EDITION — telegram.dog/bkpkriukk first impression. = kesan pertama dari saya buat kamu, kamu kelihatan.. wow. saya merasa kamu dominan warna hitam, ya? apakah kamu termasuk golongan orang yang galak? karena kata "galak" cocok sekali dengan kamu. tapi dibalik itu, saya lihat kamu orangnya cukup ramah, punya kepribadian ganda. cocok kamu menggunakan muse ningning, pas sekali. jadi sexy girl. aura mau ngelabr…
❤1
File, posted without a caption
❤1
👻 VALHORN EDITION — telegram.dog/Ccamlo first impression. = kesan pertama dari saya buat kamu, kamu orang yang begitu lemah lembut. punya aura yang.. gimana ya sayang bilangnya? misalnya kalau ada orang yang berantem nah, kamu adalah kunci dari mereka untuk memisahkan mereka. semacam itu. ada kesan yang ramah, ceria, dan gk pernah pantang menyerah. dilihat dari mata kamu cantik secara nyata, saya rasa kamu cukup.. p…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rwangga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,421,250 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rwangga named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“R.” (@rwangga), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rwangga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.