8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,100 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
https://t.me/rustag1913GS
Channel
RuStaG 1913 ( GS) Stammtisch
@rustag1913GS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,929subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001198132938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rustag1913GS |
| Description | Austausch und aktuelle Stand der GS Inhaber und warum wird er verweigert? Hilfestellung? Erfahrungen ? Glaube Nichts, prüfe selbst Ich bin D e u t s c h e gemäß § 4 Abs. 1 RuStaG (1913) Natürliche Person nach § 1 BGB a.F. (1896/1900) |
| Created | 6 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rustag1913GS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 9,929 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 9,935 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 9,937 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 9,937 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 57.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,929 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,740
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (11 April 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,450 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 572
- Videos
- 342
- Links
- 748
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 23m
- Average length
- 8m 18s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
4 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC≈4,970 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
Es ist unfassbar, was man mit diesen Menschen macht... 😡
4 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈3,260 viewsread 13 August 2026
https://transition-news.org/reuss-prozess-staatsterror-und-notwehr Transition News: In Deutschland sitzen 25 Männer und Frauen seit über dreieinhalb Jahren in Untersuchungshaft, zwei sind bereits verstorben. Alle wurden gleichzeitig mit Heinrich XIII. Prinz Reuß am 7. Dezember 2022 verhaftet. Die Vorwürfe: Bildung einer terroristischen Vereinigung und Vorbereitung eines hochverräterischen Unternehmens. Die Angekl…
24 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC≈6,740 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
Video, posted without a caption
20 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC≈6,680 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
RA Steinhöfel kommentiert: „Im Reuß-Prozess hält es das Gericht für unerheblich, ob die angeblich geplante Erstürmung des Bundestages jemals eine realistische Aussicht auf Erfolg gehabt hätte. Strafbar soll nicht mehr die Tat, nicht einmal der taugliche Versuch, sondern schon die Idee sein, sofern sie dem Staat missfällt. Der Chefankläger hat 2022 in seinem Buch die Auffassung vertreten, die "Delegitimierung des S…
20 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC≈10,700 viewsread 13 August 2026
https://journalistenwatch.com/2026/07/19/fast-vier-jahre-reichsbuerger-prozess-wie-sich-der-staat-selbst-seine-rechten-putschisten-bastelt/ Fast vier Jahre “Reichsbürger”-Prozess: Wie sich der sogenannte "Staat" selbst seine rechten Putschisten bastelt Seit über dreieinhalb Jahren sitzen Angeklagte – darunter Heinrich XIII. Prinz Reuß und Mitstreiter, die meisten ältere bis hochbetagte Herrschaften – in Untersuchun…
13 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC≈8,750 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
Seit 3,5 Jahren in U-Haft – ohne EINE Straftat! (Rechtsstaat am Limit!) Strafverteidiger Dirk Sattelmaier gibt exklusive Einblicke in den sogenannten „Rollator-Putsch"-Prozess um Heinrich XIII. Prinz Reuß. Dreieinhalb Jahre Untersuchungshaft, keine einzige festgestellte Straftat – und jetzt taucht KI auf, die das gesamte Verfahren kippen könnte.
12 Jun 2026, 16:19 UTC≈6,320 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo
Das sind die neuen Wähler, die fleißig CDU und SPD und muslimische Parteien wählen....
10 Jun 2026, 17:14 UTC≈5,910 viewsread 13 August 2026
Umsturzpläne der "Gruppe Reuß" vor Gericht: Die wichtigste Frage bleibt ungeklärt via www.hessenschau.de
10 Jun 2026, 17:06 UTC≈5,760 viewsread 13 August 2026
Neues aus Frankfurt, 2. Juni 2026: Prinz R. (PR) nimmt mit seinen Pflichtverteidigern Platz im Zeugenstuhl. Erste Frage an PR (sinngemäß): "Haben Sie eine Straftat begangen?" Antwort: "Ja, habe ich wohl nach StGB 129a, was mit nicht bewußt war. So, als wenn ich um 5.30h ein Frühstücksei esse, aber es erst ab 6h erlaubt ist." Er thematisiert hier allgemein das Bewußtsein und im speziellen sein eigenes, und wie man wo…
30 May 2026, 17:36 UTC≈8,430 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
Eine Reise in das "Deutsche Kaiserreich" Wunderschöne Zussammstellung aus Abbildungen sämtlicher deutschen Großstädte zwischen 1871 und 1918. Der Hersteller des Filmes, sowie das Alter ist mir nicht bekannt.
26 May 2026, 15:36 UTC≈7,430 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video
😡😡😡
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @rustag1913GS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 746,288 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RuStaG 1913 ( GS) Stammtisch” (@rustag1913GS), 9,929 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rustag1913GS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.