Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Русский язык с Марией Чепиницкой

Channel

Русский язык с Марией Чепиницкой

@russian_language_rifmuem

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,572subscribers

-221 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172553805
TypeChannel
Username@russian_language_rifmuem
Description🌟Розенталя вы и без меня почитаете 🎓Русский язык — для всех! 📚Без воды и нудных правил 🤘🏻Учу, но не поучаю 📈Реклама @bolobueva 🔗 https://rifmuem.com/go
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/russian_language_rifmuem

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,57211,79311,682.57 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,793 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,791 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,790 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,788 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,784 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,782 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,781 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,777 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,776 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,773 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,764 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,765 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,762 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,760 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,754 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,735 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,731 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,729 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,725 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,722 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,712 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,713 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,706 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,691 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,683 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,678 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,673 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,669 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,658 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,646 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,640 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,631 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,630 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,631 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,630 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,625 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,624 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,621 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,618 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,616 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,612 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,608 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,604 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,603 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,601 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,597 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,595 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,590 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,588 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,586 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,584 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,580 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,577 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,574 subscribers8 November 2026 — 11,572 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 93 days, net -221. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,539–11,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 14:0611,572-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:3711,574-3
4 Nov 2026, 06:5011,577-3
3 Nov 2026, 04:4711,580-4
2 Nov 2026, 02:2111,584-2
1 Nov 2026, 02:3711,586-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:3611,588-2
30 Oct 2026, 01:4111,590-5
28 Oct 2026, 23:5511,595-2
28 Oct 2026, 00:3011,597-4
26 Oct 2026, 22:0911,601-2
25 Oct 2026, 23:5111,603-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:1611,604-4
23 Oct 2026, 21:3611,608-4
22 Oct 2026, 22:2611,612-4
21 Oct 2026, 20:1111,616-2
20 Oct 2026, 17:2511,618-3
19 Oct 2026, 14:5611,621-3
18 Oct 2026, 14:3111,624-1
17 Oct 2026, 15:2811,625first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 34 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
349
Videos
126
Links
227

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,427 reactions across 34 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤63526.2%
👍57823.8%
🔥45918.9%
🥴29712.2%
👏1285.27%
😁1235.07%
🤯883.63%
💯401.65%
😍291.19%
🤣261.07%
🕊220.906%
😢20.082%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,300 views37 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Устойчивое выражение

  1. править бал66%
  2. править балом34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍25🥴12

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

16 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,230 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026

По вашим заявкам ❤️

❤1

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

16 Sept 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,390 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Мария, можно вклинюсь с примером для Вашей рубрики?😊 Давеча копали картошку, для настроения включили радио. Там пела Люся Чеботина, "По барабану". Вот такие слова в припеве: По барабану, а я всегда была упрямой Зато себя сделала сама, пока влюблённые по парам Я продолжаю править балом, послушной никогда не стану Зато я себя сделала сама, пока влюблённые по парам Я продолжаю править балом Слышите Видите ошибку? 😉 …

❤22👍17

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

11 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,800 views88 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Баба с возу — кобыле легче? Правда ли, что баба — это женщина, родившая исключительно мальчика? Спойлер: нет. Если вдруг вы думаете, что мы не можем знать, как там было раньше и все версии происхождения слов имеют место, то напрасно. Этимология — это наука о происхождении слов, и учёные свой хлеб не зря едят, устанавливая это самое происхождение. Итак, заглянем в словари. Макс Фасмер: Ба́ба — ба́бушка, укр. ба́ба, …

🔥59❤29

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

11 Sept 2026, 10:44 UTC≈1,370 views39 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁30👍6🔥2🕊1

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

10 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,500 views70 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

В какой строке указаны все глаголы-исключения из 2-го спряжения?

  1. брить, стелить35%
  2. брить, стелить, зыбиться11%
  3. брить, стелить, зыбиться, зиждиться54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥴28🤯20❤17👍4💯1

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

10 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC≈1,370 views62 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

А здесь?

  1. Всё зиждится на песке34%
  2. Всё зиждется на песке66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁27👏18🥴12❤3👍2

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

10 Sept 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,310 views83 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Как напишем?

  1. песок зыбится47%
  2. песок зыблется43%
  3. Простите, что делает песок?9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🥴38🔥20👏12😁6❤3💯2🕊2

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

9 Sept 2026, 11:36 UTC≈1,390 views63 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Оказывается, Ваня Дмитриенко не так уж и молод... Посмотрите, что написано в словаре: Ломи́ть — (что) устаревшее народно-разговорное — ломать. Конечно, правильно: ✅ ломать сигареты, палки, кости... ✅ ломить тело При сильном ветре может ломить деревья, пригибая их к земле. Но чтобы сигареты...

👍34🤣26🥴3

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

9 Sept 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,350 views38 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥29👍7🕊2

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

9 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,410 views41 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. У меня ломит всё тело91%
  2. У меня ломает всё тело9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏28❤5🕊4👍2💯1🔥1

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

9 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,460 views61 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Врываемся в новый учебный год с рубрикой #слышу_ошибку Ваня Дмитриенко ❤ ❤️ – слышу ошибку 🥴 – нет ошибки

❤58👏3

Signed Мария Чепиницкая

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @russian_language_rifmuem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Sept 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz748 voters

Устойчивое выражение

  1. править бал66%
  2. править балом34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz675 voters

В какой строке указаны все глаголы-исключения из 2-го спряжения?

  1. брить, стелить35%
  2. брить, стелить, зыбиться11%
  3. брить, стелить, зыбиться, зиждиться54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz685 voters

А здесь?

  1. Всё зиждится на песке34%
  2. Всё зиждется на песке66%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2026, 14:46 UTCAnonymous Quiz730 voters

Как напишем?

  1. песок зыбится47%
  2. песок зыблется43%
  3. Простите, что делает песок?9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz692 voters

Как правильно?

  1. У меня ломит всё тело91%
  2. У меня ломает всё тело9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Jun 2026, 12:41 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,030 voters approx.

Как правильно?

  1. застёжка-кнопка74%
  2. застёжка кнопка26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 17 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Учитель русского | Русский язык
@teacherus · 34,728
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Вредный корректор
@julia_v_redcor · 19,965
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
Я люблю русский язык
@rus_yaz_tg · 22,651
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Александр Толмачёв
@detlektor · 82,603
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русский язык с Марией Чепиницкой” (@russian_language_rifmuem), 11,572 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_language_rifmuem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.