Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,317–1,326 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:17
1,325
+7
14 Sept 2026, 00:19
1,318
-2
5 Sept 2026, 18:41
1,320
-2
29 Aug 2026, 18:47
1,322
-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:33
1,324
+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:15
1,322
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:46
1,322
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
617 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
243
39.4%
👍
191
31.0%
❤🔥
71
11.5%
👏
35
5.67%
💯
23
3.73%
👌
21
3.40%
🤔
18
2.92%
👎
9
1.46%
😱
4
0.648%
😢
2
0.324%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть ли поставка без поставки?
В рамках одного дела столкнулся с теоретическим вопросом по договору поставки, который приобрел ключевой значение для спора.
Поэтому хочу понять какие мнения будут по этим узким вопросам.
Фабула дела👇
Заключен договор поставки для госнужд. Все существенные условия согласованы, товар – сложное изделие на большую сумму.
Период поставки с 1 мая по 30 ноября 2025.
Срок поставки 15 д…
WB против продавцов
Налет на склад товаров и их гибель, обнажил сразу несколько правовых проблем, не говоря уже о политических.
Если подойти к вопросу прямолинейно, то он сводится к тому, кто несёт риск гибели товара в результате атаки БПЛА❓
Сначала посмотрим на доводы, подкрепляющие позицию WB.
1⃣Отсутствие ответственности закреплено договором и риск гибели лежит на собственнике (продавце).
Насколько справедли…
Как вы лодку назовёте .....
В этой истории участвовал мой друг. Я в этой теме не специалист, могу неправильно передать термины🤔
Была небольшая крепкая компания, которая занималась здоровой едой. Занималась серьезно, вплоть до того, что сама выращивала исходное сырье. А из него делала всякие батончики из льна, давила масло из редких растений, пекла печенье из амаранта и другую экзотику. В общем жила компания и рад…
Запись эфира, который состоялся 09.06 🗓
Тема: ✅ Как эффективно взаимодействовать с приставами, чтобы исполнить решение суда и взыскать долг? Приятного просмотра, коллеги 📹
Арбитражные казусы от Михаила Морозова pinned «Как принято среди приличных блогеров, сообщаю мои резервные каналы. Пока что они будут будут близки по содержанию с телегой. Потом, надеюсь, вокруг каждого сформируется своя аудитория. Макс будет клон телеграмм канала. ВК планирую превратить в группу…»
ИИ для судебного юриста
Юридическая общественность активно обсуждает постановление АС ЗСО, которым наложен штраф за выдуманную ИИ судебную практику. https://kad.arbitr.ru/Document/Pdf/01899d03-ae95-4846-958e-cbe8296855ea/984c40be-bd1b-423a-b4f5-1d46ef559ef7/A27-7831-2025_20260514_Opredelenie.pdf?isAddStamp=True
❗️Суд в этом случае был весьма категоричен в выводах❗️
📌Ответственность за текст документа несёт юрист.
…
Как принято среди приличных блогеров, сообщаю мои резервные каналы. Пока что они будут будут близки по содержанию с телегой. Потом, надеюсь, вокруг каждого сформируется своя аудитория.
Макс будет клон телеграмм канала.
ВК планирую превратить в группу Сибирских юристов с местными новостями и обсуждениями. В идеале писать там буду не только я и она разветвится на блоки по интересам. Пойдет ли эта задумка пока не з…
👌13👍7😱4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @russian_arbitration. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Арбитражные казусы от Михаила Морозова” (@russian_arbitration), 1,325 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/russian_arbitration.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.