Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Русская Высшая Школа Остеопатической Медицины

@rusosteopathy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,599subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512174731
TypeChannel
Username@rusosteopathy
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rusosteopathy

Growth

1,5981,5991,598.57 Aug 2026, 17:47 — 1,598 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:17 — 1,598 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:36 — 1,599 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:478 Aug 2026, 09:36
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,598–1,599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:361,599+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:171,598no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:471,598first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 1,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
392
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,093
Reactions total138
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 57s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10347.7%
💯3918.1%
👍3516.2%
🔥146.48%
🤝73.24%
🕊52.31%
❤‍🔥41.85%
🥰31.39%
😍20.926%
🆒10.463%
👌10.463%
💔10.463%
😁10.463%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC149 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сомневаться — нормально. Выбор образовательной траектории — это всегда шаг, требующий взвешенного подхода. Сомнения, возникающие перед принятием такого решения, свидетельствуют о зрелости клинического мышления: любой ответственный специалист стремится оценить не только содержание программы, но и её долгосрочные перспективы, изменение профессионального статуса, юридические и практические аспекты будущей деятельности.

🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC204 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем обсуждать причины, почему врачи выбирают Остеопатию, но сегодня рассмотрим вопрос чуть глубже 😉 Медицина — редкая профессия, где решение о выборе пути принимается не один раз, а на всю жизнь. В отличие от многих сфер, где можно сменить направление легко и безболезненно, врач остаётся врачом всегда. Мы знаем семьи, где медицина передаётся из поколения в поколение, где дети продолжают дело родителей, а за у

💯72

5 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC232 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем делиться с Вами отзывами наших выпускников ❤️ ---------- "Хотим выразить нашу глубокую и тёплую благодарность любимой РВШОМ. Эта школа стала для нас не просто местом учёбы — она стала домом, где открываются не только новые техники, но и новые смыслы. Здесь знания переплетаются с сердечностью, а профессионализм — с призывом быть человеком, внимательным к чужой боли. Особая дань уважения нашему ректору, п

10🕊2

4 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC269 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Парадокс, с которым порой сталкиваются наши абитуриенты: путь в остеопатию начинается с позиции пациента. Потому что случаются ситуации, когда несмотря на медицинское образование, доступ к диагностике, коллег, готовых помочь, проблема со здоровьем остаётся. Где-то в теле прячется напряжение, которое не уходит, боль, которую никто не может объяснить, ограничение, мешающее жить. Этот опыт — странный, неловкий, обеску

💯121

3 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC364 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уважаемые коллеги! Совсем скоро сентябрь откроет новый учебный сезон, и мы подготовили для Вас насыщенную программу мероприятий в разных городах. Выбирайте, планируйте и регистрируйтесь заранее. 🗓 12–13 сентября, Новосибирск 📍 Семинар «Спираль рождения» 🎓 Ведущий: Малашенкова Надежда Владимировна 🗓 18–20 сентября, Санкт-Петербург 📍 Семинар «Рецепторное перепрограммирование. Мышечное тестирование» 🎓 Ведущий: Сабини

7

25 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC499 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы всегда очень трепетно относимся к словам выпускников Школы. За плечами каждого из них — непростой путь: десятки семинаров, сотни вопросов, первые победы и долгожданная уверенность в себе как в специалисте. Мы не прощаемся с Вами. Мы всегда рады тёплым встречам, новым вопросам и, конечно, Вашим победам ❤ ----------— "Уважаемая Тамара Ивановна, дорогие преподаватели, любимая команда РВШОМ! Сегодня для нашей 46 г

10👍3🆒1

24 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC450 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почему врачи выбирают остеопатию? Ответов на этот вопрос действительно много. И один из них - время. В стандартной медицинской практике врач часто вынужден действовать в жёстких рамках протоколов и временных ограничений. Это неизбежно сказывается и на качестве приёма, и на состоянии самого врача. Остеопатия предлагает иной подход: не просто увеличить время контакта с пациентом, а изменить саму структуру взаимодейств

💯93🕊1

24 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC414 viewsread 7 August 2026

Благодарим Вас за ответы и постепенно обсудим все пункты 🙌

23 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC474 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Уважаемые коллеги, приглашаем Вас обсудить, почему Вы выбрали остеопатию? Что стало причиной?

  1. Возможность работать с первопричиной, а не только следствием41%
  2. Время на пациента — возможность услышать и почувствовать8%
  3. Интерес к целостному подходу и системному мышлению55%
  4. Желание дополнить свою основную специальность28%
  5. Собственный опыт и личный интерес48%
  6. Рекомендации коллег или друзей13%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC445 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отзывов много не бывает ☺️ Ведь они помогают многим абитуриентам сформировать первое впечатление о Школе, узнать сильные стороны обучения и заочно познакомиться с нашим подходом ко всему образовательному процессу. Сегодня делимся с Вами свежим отзывом об учебном семинаре Арифулиной Динары Муратовны в Краснодаре 🥰 ------------- "Огромная благодарность Арифулиной Динаре Муратовне. Шестидневный семинар в Краснодаре

11👍2❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC471 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Напоминаем, что все самые актуальные новости и события можно смотреть без прокси и впн 😉 МЫ В ВК МЫ В MAX

👌1💔1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC507 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Быть высокопрофессиональным врачом-остеопатом — врожденное качество? Талант? Или навык, которому можно научиться? Опыт, который можно приобрести? Знания, которые можно расширять? Отвечает Цетуева Ирина Анатольевна, преподаватель РВШОМ по висцеральной остеопатии, врач-остеопат, Д.О.

19💯7❤‍🔥3🥰3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rusosteopathy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

Уважаемые коллеги, приглашаем Вас обсудить, почему Вы выбрали остеопатию? Что стало причиной?

  1. Возможность работать с первопричиной, а не только следствием41%
  2. Время на пациента — возможность услышать и почувствовать8%
  3. Интерес к целостному подходу и системному мышлению55%
  4. Желание дополнить свою основную специальность28%
  5. Собственный опыт и личный интерес48%
  6. Рекомендации коллег или друзей13%

The shares total 193%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 675,217 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Русская Высшая Школа Остеопатической Медицины” (@rusosteopathy), 1,599 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusosteopathy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.