3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 759–761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:25
759
-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:46
761
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:36
761
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 759 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (27 March 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
893
Reactions total
19
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5456140674028019486
29
31.2%
custom 5424972470023104089
22
23.7%
custom 5345999716645609811
15
16.1%
👍
14
15.1%
custom 5224257782013769471
7
7.53%
🗿
6
6.45%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rushash_news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Доходность майнинга растет, но рынок продолжает отбирать сильнейших
За последний месяц добывать биткоин стало немного выгоднее. Hashprice вырос на 10% — с $29,67 до $32,52 за 1 PH/s благодаря снижению сложности сети примерно на 15% с начала года.
При этом экономика майнинга остается напряженной. По оценке JPMorgan, около 20% мирового хешрейта находится ниже точки безубыточности, а фактическая рентабельность по-преж…
⚡️ Доступны мощности для размещения в Карелии
На нашей площадке в Петрозаводске доступен объем для размещения вычислительного оборудования. Выгодный вариант для работы в гибком режиме энергопотребления.
📈 Uptime — от 65%
💰 Тариф — от 3,6 руб./кВт·ч
⚡️ Современная энергетическая инфраструктура
🛡 Круглосуточная охрана и видеонаблюдение
🌐 Стабильное подключение к интернету
🛠 Техническое сопровождение и мониторинг
🚚 Уд…
📌 Динамика биткоина и стратегии на III–IV квартал 2026
🔹Динамика котировок: BTC удерживается в узком ценовом коридоре $60 000–$65 000. В августе аналитики прогнозируют продолжение фазы консолидации с сохранением вероятности локального снижения к уровням поддержки $50 000–$55 000.
🔹Макроэкономическое давление: высокая процентная ставка ФРС США удерживает капитал в инструментах с фиксированной доходностью. Дополнитель…
⚡️ Дополнительные мощности в Саратове
Наша площадка в Саратове расширилась — теперь доступен дополнительный объем для размещения вычислительного оборудования.
🔋 Собственная газовая генерация
📈 Uptime — от 92%
🛡 Круглосуточная охрана и видеонаблюдение
🌐 Стабильный интернет и постоянный мониторинг
🛠 Опытные технические специалисты на площадке
💰 Тариф — от 4,8 руб./кВт·ч
Площадка полностью готова к установке и запуск…
Биткоин четвертую неделю подряд в плюсе — курс выше $65 тыс., с 29 июня рост составил 10%. Но главный герой недели — Ethereum: актив вырос на 24% за тот же период и обновил двухмесячный максимум, поднявшись выше $1,97 тыс.
📊 Ключевые цифры для майнеров и инвесторов:
— Капитализация всего крипторынка — $2,24 трлн (+2% за сутки)
— Приток в биткоин-ETF за неделю — почти $34 млн
— Приток в ETH-ETF — почти $104 млн (трет…
☄️Прогноз по биткоину на май: консолидация или продолжение роста?
Bitcoin закрепился выше отметки $80 000, однако рынок демонстрирует признаки замедления. Рассмотрим ключевые факторы, которые будут определять динамику первой криптовалюты в мае.
🔹Текущая ситуация
Рынок находится в фазе консолидации после волатильного апреля. Для преодоления уровней сопротивления $85 000–$88 000 необходимы дополнительные катализаторы…
США готовят крупнейшую перезагрузку крипторынка
Белый дом хочет принять закон Clarity Act уже к 4 июля. По сути, это попытка прописать понятные правила игры для криптовалюты в США. И да, это тот самый момент, которого рынок ждал годами.
Что ещё важнее — администрация Трампа пообещала в ближайшие недели раскрыть детали национального биткоин-резерва. Предполагается, что США уже централизуют и учитывают конфискованные…
🟠 Bitcoin достиг 3-месячного максимума
В понедельник Bitcoin поднялся до трехмесячного максимума (вырос на 2,7% — до $80 286, показав +12% за апрель).
Что поддержало рост:
🔸Приток в ETF достиг $1,97 млрд в апреле — максимум с октября 2025
🔸Позитив от CLARITY Act (законопроект о регулировании крипты в США)
🔸Альткоины тоже в плюсе: ETH +3,6%, DOGE +4,6%
📊 Рынок растёт, но устойчивость роста под вопросом.
Где эффективно майнить криптовалюту?
Глава комитета Госдумы по финансовому рынку Анатолий Аксаков призвал развивать майнинг в восточных регионах — там, где электроэнергия производится, но не потребляется и буквально «уходит в воздух».
В фокусе Дальний Восток и Якутия: избыток мощностей, удалённые газовые месторождения, низкая себестоимость энергии.
Пока это обсуждается на уровне законодательных инициатив, RusHash …
⚡Госдума приняла в первом чтении законопроект «О цифровой валюте и цифровых правах».
Торговля криптовалютой в России будет разрешена только через лицензированных посредников: биржи, брокеров, доверительных управляющих и цифровых депозитариев. Также планируется создание легальных криптообменников.
Лицензии на работу с цифровыми валютами будет выдавать Банк России. Регулятор получит широкие полномочия по надзору за в…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rushash_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,180,537 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RUSHASH” (@rushash_news), 759 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rushash_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
