Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 55 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,976–1,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 12:22
1,978
-1
19 Sept 2026, 16:58
1,979
-4
2 Sept 2026, 02:57
1,983
-1
30 Aug 2026, 02:27
1,984
-1
24 Aug 2026, 00:27
1,985
-2
20 Aug 2026, 16:27
1,987
-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:44
1,989
-2
14 Aug 2026, 02:06
1,991
-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:02
1,992
+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:50
1,991
-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:23
1,993
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:48
1,993
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 54s
Average length
2m 18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
674 reactions across 15 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
150
22.3%
🔥
97
14.4%
👍
75
11.1%
💩
47
6.97%
😁
37
5.49%
👎
36
5.34%
💯
29
4.30%
😱
29
4.30%
🤣
25
3.71%
🤬
22
3.26%
🗿
18
2.67%
✍
17
2.52%
😢
14
2.08%
💊
13
1.93%
🤔
9
1.34%
🤮
9
1.34%
🐳
8
1.19%
💔
8
1.19%
😨
5
0.742%
🥱
5
0.742%
9 further kinds
21
3.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 674 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚆💻 «ЦИФРОВОЙ ТРАНСПОРТНЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ»™
(в целевой модели. где-то между «к 2035» и «когда-нибудь»)
Ректор публично говорил статью писал про курс на «цифровой транспортный университет»… и в какой-то момент «канал информирования» в Telegram тоже закрываю.
Цифровая коммуникация: сегодня тут, завтра там. Нормально.
🎖️ Дальше - магия премий ✨
«Университет года в цифре»:
победитель - один, дипломов - много, статусов - …
#НамПишут
Жил-был один замечательный ректор… ИрГУПСа… Который думает, что Он – монарх, и ему все можно… В прошлом он – начальник детской железной дороги Иркутска… Которая практически встала при нем… Но, это его не остановило… Его вернул один из бывших ректоров ИрГУПС – Хоменко, который постоянно продвигал кумовство. Так случилось и на этот раз – когда предыдущего ректора снял учредитель (ФАЖТ), вернули Хоменко, а он…
Преподаватель УрГУПС 8 лет не сможет обучать студентов и заплатит 4,5 млн рублей штрафа за коррупцию
Железнодорожным районным судом города Екатеринбурга вынесен приговор по уголовному делу в отношении 37-летнего бывшего преподавателя университета путей сообщения. Он признан виновным по чч. 2 и 3 ст. 290 УК РФ (получение должностным лицом взятки), по ч. 3 ст. 159 УК РФ (мошенничество, совершенное с использованием слу…
Амбициозные дальневосточники
Через 10 минут начнутся защиты дальневосточного Приоритета. С одной стороны это самый низкоконкурентный трек. С другой - самый интересный, так как плотность неожиданных звёздочек на один квадратный метр выше, чем в основном пуле программы. Да, тут эффект низкой базы и небольшого количества, но тем не менее. Как минимум качество выступлений из года в год имело позитивную динамику.
Хоть н…
Тендер без правил — и бухгалтерия без правил
После публикации «Тендер без правил», где рассказывалось, как в ДВГУПС заключили договор с фирмой без лицензии на утилизацию, сама главный бухгалтер университета решила выйти на связь. Казалось бы, человек, отвечающий за финансовую дисциплину, должен был прояснить детали закупки и объяснить, почему вуз подписал договор с нелицензированной организацией.
Но вместо аргумент…
Тендер без правил: в ДВГУПС не проверили лицензию подрядчика
В Дальневосточном университете путей сообщения нарушения в заключении договоров на оказание услуг. Как выяснилось, закупочная комиссия вуза подписала документы с фирмой, у которой не оказалось лицензии на работы, указанные в договоре.
В университете накопились горы старой оргтехники, ламп, огнетушителей и прочего хлама. Все это нужно было утилизировать по…
ИНТЕРНЕТ В ОБЩЕЖИТИИ ДВГУПС — ПРОСЬБА РАЗОБРАТЬСЯ 🛜
От студентов ДВГУПС поступают обращения: в общежитии нестабильный интернет, а местами его нет совсем — даже мобильного.
Из-за этого сложно выполнять онлайн-задания, участвовать в дистанционных парах и отправлять работы преподавателям.
«Интернета даже мобильного почти нет — как мы должны делать онлайн-задания?
После лекций бегать искать, где есть связь? На листке …
👤Создание единой образовательной транспортной среды – приоритет подготовки специалистов
На площадке Сибирского государственного университета путей сообщения состоялся семинар ректоров транспортных вузов. Мероприятие прошло в преддверии IX Форума Ассоциации ректоров транспортных вузов России и Китая.
Участники обсудили предложения по совместным образовательным инициативам и реализацию научно-технологической политики…
👎10❤5👍3🤣2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rusgups. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Завтра мы покажем самый крутой ролик про транспортный университет. Угадай про какой университет мы говорим 😉
РГУПС2%
ПГУПС15%
РУТ (МИИТ)14%
ПривГУПС5%
УрГУПС2%
ОмГУПС30%
ИрГУПС11%
СГУПС2%
ДВГУПС20%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 24 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПАРОВОЗНЫЙ АКАДЕМИК” (@rusgups), 1,978 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusgups.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.