Channel
@rusesteb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,455subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001820832387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rusesteb |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rusesteb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 8,455 | +13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 8,442 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 8,425 | +15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 8,410 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 259,390 |
| Reactions total | 9,747 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,006 reactions across 81 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5364169339568136726 | 1,203 | 15.0% | |
| 🌭 | 1,098 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5305634763594281691 | 937 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5316999552002170704 | 778 | 9.72% | |
| custom 5294483443650928847 | 557 | 6.96% | |
| 😁 | 551 | 6.88% | |
| custom 5276047549935919172 | 524 | 6.55% | |
| ❤ | 486 | 6.07% | |
| 👍 | 464 | 5.80% | |
| 💯 | 201 | 2.51% | |
| 🤣 | 169 | 2.11% | |
| 😭 | 130 | 1.62% | |
| 🔥 | 124 | 1.55% | |
| 🙏 | 115 | 1.44% | |
| 😢 | 113 | 1.41% | |
| 💩 | 94 | 1.17% | |
| 🫡 | 60 | 0.749% | |
| 🌚 | 42 | 0.525% | |
| 🤗 | 40 | 0.5% | |
| 🤯 | 33 | 0.412% | |
| 28 further kinds | 287 | 3.58% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,747reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rusesteb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❌ Колобок повесился — и в российском кино освободилась ниша для новых героев. Мы уже нашли, кем её занять. Марвел, подвинься. Квас налит, попкорн из кубанской кукурузы готов, а на экраны выходят блокбастеры, которые точно разнесли бы прокат. "Единая Россия" запускает собственную киновселенную ⤴️
custom 536416933956813672615❤2🌭2🤡1🤬1custom 52944834436509288471custom 53056347635942816911
Photo, posted without a caption
🌭38custom 536416933956813672625custom 52944834436509288479custom 53169995520021707043🤣1🤯1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 530563476359428169156🌭6❤3custom 53641693395681367263custom 52760475499359191722custom 53169995520021707041
Photo, posted without a caption
😁122custom 536416933956813672625🤯10🌭8💔4😡2custom 53169995520021707042
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 536416933956813672682custom 527604754993591917228custom 53169995520021707043🌭2👍2custom 52944834436509288472❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 531699955200217070450custom 536416933956813672614custom 53056347635942816915🌭3💊2❤1
Video, posted without a caption
custom 536416933956813672629❤12custom 53056347635942816915🌭2custom 53169995520021707042
Раритетная кассета Муцураева, куплена на грозненском рынке в 1998 году. #минувшихэпох
custom 531699955200217070461👍14🌭6custom 53056347635942816914custom 52944834436509288472❤🔥1
250 лайков и будет неделя гифок с котиками по просьбе подписчика я как бы хз котики не наш формат но мало ли 👍 - вот это ставить если что
👍380👎27❤18custom 53641693395681367264custom 53169995520021707043🌭2😁2🗿1
Photo, posted without a caption
🌭75😁26custom 536416933956813672614custom 53169995520021707047❤4🤣2
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 531699955200217070457🍌15custom 536416933956813672610custom 52760475499359191723custom 53056347635942816912🌭1
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5316999552002170704114🌭18custom 536416933956813672614👍3custom 52944834436509288472🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @rusesteb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 104,180 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“russian establishment 🌭” (@rusesteb), 8,455 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rusesteb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.