5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,001–2,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 14:24
2,004
-7
15 Aug 2026, 04:34
2,011
-11
11 Aug 2026, 13:15
2,022
-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:02
2,024
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:58
2,024
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 2,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
244
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
20 (27 January 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
244
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
304 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5235837975916465758
153
50.3%
custom 5206689080850540078
151
49.7%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ruqya_shariah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
◆КАК ЛЕЧИТЬ ЗАВИСТЬ В СВОЁМ СЕРДЦЕ ↓
Зависть (الحسد) — это болезнь сердца, от которой не застрахован никто. Она может появиться даже у верующего. Но отличие искреннего мусульманина в том, что он не оправдывает это чувство, а стремится очистить от него свое сердце.
Аллах не оставил нас без лечения. Коран, Сунна и слова ученых указывают на пути избавления от этой болезни.
1. Помните, что удел распределяет только Алл…
◈ «КАК МЫ ЛЕЧИМСЯ В НАШЕЙ СЕМЬЕ»
Меня часто спрашивают: как я лечусь сама и как лечу своих детей во время болезней?
Мой подход основан на том, что исцеление приходит только от Аллаха, а мы используем дозволенные причины.
Первое, к чему я обращаюсь при болезни, — это рукъя. Потому что Коран — это исцеление и милость для верующих.
Аллах сказал:
«И Мы ниспосылаем из Корана то, что является исцелением и милость…
▫️ Речь Всевышнего Аллаха — это один из самых великих способов лечения всех общих недугов, а особенно, сглаза, зависти, колдовства и поражения джиннов.
В речи Аллаха содержится абсолютное исцеление от всех недугов.
Есть ли что-то полезней, чем то, что мусульманин решит помочь своему брату мусульманину путем чтения заговоров (рукъя) из Книги Своего Господа и Сунны Его пророка ﷺ, если его брата коснулась болезнь или ка…
Ибн аль-Къаййим сказал:
«Если бы Всевышний не лечил Своих рабов лекарством в виде испытаний и бедствий, то они стали бы тиранами, притеснителями и высокомерными».
«Задуль-ма’ад» 4/195
◈ О ПРОЯВЛЕНИЯХ ДЖИННА ВО ВРЕМЯ РУКЪИ
В этом вопросе у многих сложилось неправильное понимание. Люди часто считают, что проявления джинна во время чтения рукъи или прослушивания Корана указывают на эффективность лечения, на правильность метода или даже на скорое исцеление.
☞Однако это не так.
Подобные проявления прежде всего свидетельствуют о наличии проблемы и могут подтверждать факт одержимости. Но сами по себ…
🛜 Важное обращение :
Кто не имеет финансовой возможности ходить на лечение от духовных болезней
Мы поможем вам бесплатно:
●Будем читать.
●Составим программу лечения.
Вам просто нужно
приходить на чтение.
●Также если вы не в состоянии ходить на лечение, мы приедем к вам домой, если это в черте города Хасавюрт.
Для записи, напишите
на номер: 8928 557 75 92
Чтобы лечение было эффективным, заметным, необходимо:
●Исключить все то что мешает сконцентрироваться на продолжительном чтении КОРАНА сделав намерения исцелиться.
Исключить мысли от том что вы не исцелитесь, от страхом, от самовнушения о тяжести болезни, ее продолжительности...
Остранитесь от многих разговоров людей вокруг этой сферы.
Найдите надёжного, знающего чтеца, советуется с ним как вам самим лечиться,лечит…
МОЖНО-ЛИ ПУГАТЬ ЛЮДЕЙ ДЖИНАМИ?
❓Вопрос: Некоторые люди делают дуа против своего друга, брата или ребёнка и говорят: «Пусть тебя заберёт джинн». Разрешено ли это?
💬Ответ шейха Мукбиля ибн Хади аль-Уадии:(رحمه الله )
Это не дозволено. Как уже упоминалось, Всевышний АЛЛАХ говорит в Своей Книге, наставляя Своего Пророка Мухаммада ﷺ:
«Скажи: “Господь мой! Прибегаю к Тебе от наущений дьяволов. И прибегаю к Тебе, Господ…
◈СОН КАК ТОЧКА УЯЗВИМОСТИ И ПОЧЕМУ ОН ТАК ВАЖЕН!
▷В работе с одержимыми, а также с теми, кто пострадал от сглаза и колдовства, регулярно проявляется одна и та же проблема:
человек начинает терять сон.
•Кто-то почти полностью отказывается от сна.
•Кто-то спит урывками.
•Кого-то, наоборот, погружает в чрезмерную сонливость.
...Это не случайность▽
Сон — одна из первых сфер, по которой наносится удар, потому что именн…
◆ ЛОВУШКИ ШАЙТАНА
553 – Сообщается, что аль-Хайсам ибн Малик сказал:
«Я слышал, как ан-Ну’ман ибн Башир (да будет доволен им Аллах), стоя на минбаре сказал:
“Поистине, у шайтана есть сети и ловушки! И, поистине, сетями шайтана и его ловушками являются:
– Неблагодарность к милостям Аллаха;
– Проявление горделивости посредством того, что даровал Аллах;
– Высокомерное отношение к рабам Аллаха;
– Следование страст…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruqya_shariah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АЛЛАХ - ТОТ, КТО ИСЦЕЛЯЕТ!” (@ruqya_shariah), 2,004 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruqya_shariah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
