Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шаръий руқия

Channel

Шаръий руқия

@ruqiya_shariy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,551subscribers

+270 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387726473
TypeChannel
Username@ruqiya_shariy
Created23 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ruqiya_shariy

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,2776,5516,4147 August 2026 — 6,281 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,281 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,292 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,286 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,301 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,308 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,320 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,308 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,324 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,551 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,236–6,592 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:396,551+227
14 Sept 2026, 23:196,324+16
11 Sept 2026, 01:016,308-12
5 Sept 2026, 17:186,320-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:056,324+16
26 Aug 2026, 07:436,308-1
22 Aug 2026, 22:596,309+8
19 Aug 2026, 21:056,301+15
16 Aug 2026, 17:576,286-6
13 Aug 2026, 07:246,292+15
10 Aug 2026, 09:066,277-4
7 Aug 2026, 06:306,281no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:286,281first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 05s
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

713 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍23132.4%
❤20729.0%
😢16122.6%
🔥638.84%
😱476.59%
😁40.561%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC≈1,200 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Едирилган сеҳрга қарши муолажа. @ruqiya_shariy

👍18❤3

9 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC≈1,400 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بِسْــــــــــــــــــــــمِ ﷲِالرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم САВОЛ ВА ЖАВОБЛАР ГУРУҲИМИЗ ОЧИЛДИ ИН ШАА АЛЛОҲ ГУРУҲ ҚОИДАЛАРИ Гуруҳда фақат шаръий руқия, сеҳр, кўз тегиши, жинлар оламига тааллуқли бўлган саволлар берилади. Бизнинг мавзуга тааллуқли бўлмаган ҳар қандай диний саволларга ҳам жавоб берилмайди. Саволларга фақат роқий Равшанбек домла жавоб берадилар. Эркаклар бегона аёлларга ёзиши мумкин эмас. Гуруҳ қоид…

❤1

7 Aug 2026, 13:53 UTC≈1,970 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Бир роқий биродаримиз олдига бир бемор аёл келибди. Роқий ундан: «Муаммонг нима?» — деб сўраганида, аёл дардини айтиб берибди. Аёл аввалроқ бир «домла»га муаммосини ҳал қилдириш учун борган экан. Аммо у «домла» аслида домла эмас, домла қиёфасига кирган сеҳргар бўлиб чиқибди. Аёлнинг айтишича, у сеҳргар ҳатто унга нечанчидир хотин бўлишни таклиф қилган (ҳолбуки аёлнинг эри бор эди). Табиийки, аёл бунга рози бўлмага…

😱17👍11😢6❤4😁1

6 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,770 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @temurazamPhoto

Феруза исмли синглимиз оғир дард билан синовдан ўтмоқда. Шифокорлар текширувидан сўнг бош мияда атрофия белгилари аниқланиб, зудлик билан даволаниш ва мунтазам мутахассис назорати тавсия қилинган. Даволаниш харажатлари оиласи учун оғирлик қилмоқда. Шу сабабли Аллоҳ розилиги учун саховат қилишни истаган барча инсонларга мурожаат қиламиз. Синглимиз дарддан фориғ бўлиши учун имконингиз етганича эҳсон қилинг. 5614 68…

😢11❤2

5 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC≈4,810 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Узум сиркасининг фойдалари ҳақида. @ruqiya_shariy

❤7👍5

2 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈2,860 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بِسْــــــــــــــــــــــمِ ﷲِالرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم САВОЛ ВА ЖАВОБЛАР ГУРУҲИМИЗ ОЧИЛДИ ИН ШАА АЛЛОҲ ГУРУҲ ҚОИДАЛАРИ Гуруҳда фақат шаръий руқия, сеҳр, кўз тегиши, жинлар оламига тааллуқли бўлган саволлар берилади. Бизнинг мавзуга тааллуқли бўлмаган ҳар қандай диний саволларга ҳам жавоб берилмайди. Саволларга фақат роқий Равшанбек домла жавоб берадилар. Эркаклар бегона аёлларга ёзиши мумкин эмас. Гуруҳ қоид…

👍4❤2

1 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC≈3,050 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Обуначимиздан келган хат Сеҳрга бепарво юриш яхшиликка олиб келмайди. Ассалому алайкум. Мени оиламга сеҳр кўп йиллардан бери сеҳр қилинаётган эди, бунга унчалик эътибор бермай келардим. Ғалати туюлганди. Расмларимизга кимдир шам ёқиб устидан қўярди. Танишлар инстаграмда кўрдик деса, кимдир ҳазил қиляпти, майнабозчилик-ку деб ўйлардим. Фарзандларим касал бўлишни бошлади. Ўзим жуда хунук тушлар кўриб қийна…

😢32😱9❤7🔥4👍3

29 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC≈4,610 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Охирги пайт роқийларга тош отиш кўпайиб кетди а ? Бир икки роқийларнинг хатоси деб барча роқийларни ҳақорат қилиш қанчалик инсофдан билмадик. Келинг буюк имомлар роқийлар ҳақида нималар дейишганини қараб кўрамиз. 1. Имом ан-Нававий ​Имом Нававий «Саҳиҳи Муслим»га ёзган шарҳида руқия билан шуғулланиб, одамлар оғирини енгил қилувчилар ҳақида шундай дейди: ​«Қуръон ва Аллоҳнинг зикрлари билан дам солиш фақатгина жо…

❤24👍15🔥3😢1

27 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC≈3,650 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

#Сеҳр_ҳақида Психолог сеҳрга ишонадими, деманг, ишонаман. Бундан бир неча йиллар олдин бир инсонни қўлида сеҳр қилинувчи китобни, расмлари билан кўрганман... Сеҳрнинг таъсири бўйича туркум мақолалар ёзиб бораман... Бир куни узоқроқ таниш дугона опам телефон қилди. Учрашиб олиши кераклигини айтди. Бордим. Эшигини очганди, уларни кўриб , юрагим орқага тортиб кетди. Озиб, чўпдек бўлиб кетибди. Кўриб, очиғи қўрқиб к…

👍15😢14❤13😱6🔥2

26 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC≈3,230 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بِسْــــــــــــــــــــــمِ ﷲِالرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيم САВОЛ ВА ЖАВОБЛАР ГУРУҲИМИЗ ОЧИЛДИ ИН ШАА АЛЛОҲ ГУРУҲ ҚОИДАЛАРИ Гуруҳда фақат шаръий руқия, сеҳр, кўз тегиши, жинлар оламига тааллуқли бўлган саволлар берилади. Бизнинг мавзуга тааллуқли бўлмаган ҳар қандай диний саволларга ҳам жавоб берилмайди. Саволларга фақат роқий Равшанбек домла жавоб берадилар. Эркаклар бегона аёлларга ёзиши мумкин эмас. Гуруҳ қоид…

❤1

24 Jul 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,970 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

КЎЗ ёхуд НАЗАР Ибн Касир роҳимаҳуллоҳнинг "Ал-Бидоя ван-ниҳоя" асарларида шундай келади: Умавийларнинг 7-халифаси бўлмиш Сулаймон ибн Абдулмалик қирчиллама 40 ёшида тахтга ўтиради. Бир куни Халифа ҳашаматли либосларини кийиб, кўзгуга қараб ўз ҳусни ва ёшлигидан ғурурланиб: «Мен — қудратли ва навқирон подшоҳман!» - дейди. Шу воқеадан кўп ўтмай Халифа ўз-ўзидан оғир хасталаниб, вафот этади. Шу сабабли ислом тарихида …

😢21❤7😱7🔥5👍4

22 Jul 2026, 05:04 UTC≈4,570 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Бемор ноласи ​Бир аёл сеҳрдан даволанаман деб, ижтимоий тармоқларда ўзини реклама қилаётган фолбинга мурожаат қилади. Ҳалиги фолбин, табиийки, расм сўрайди. "Сенда сеҳр бор, 2 миллион берсанг, тозалаб бераман", дейди. Пулни олади ҳам. Пулни олгандан сўнг фолбин шантаж қилишга ўтади: "Менда расминг бор. Палонча пул бермасанг, сени сеҳрлаб ташлайман, фалон-фалон жойларинг оғрийди", дейди. Пул ололмагач, афсуски, фол…

😢24👍14❤6🔥4😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ruqiya_shariy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fayoz Aminov
@doctor_fayoz · 42,885
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шаръий руқия” (@ruqiya_shariy), 6,551 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruqiya_shariy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.