Channel
@rumiancevEN
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
54subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002318299412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rumiancevEN |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rumiancevEN |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 54 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 57 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 59 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 60 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 61 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 14 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 January 2026 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The cloud clearly shows weakness — price is under pressure and structure is breaking. Most likely, we’ll see more downside and sideways consolidation. No matter what others say — this is not the time to buy Bitcoin on spot. #BTC #Bitcoin #crypto #trading #technicalanalysis #priceaction #axelalt
Sooner or later, I believe #BTC will trade into the $48k–$37k zone. I’m not saying we must hit $37k exactly, but I’m more than confident that price visits this range at some point. For me, it’s no longer a question of if — it’s a question of when. #BTC #Bitcoin #Crypto #BTCUSDT #CryptoAnalysis
❤1
Scenario remains unchanged — nothing critical has happened yet. Yes, we’re bouncing back into the diagonal / resistance zone again, but this could easily be just a fake breakout. The most important thing right now: don’t take out the previous high (the horizontal line). If we don’t make a new high, the plan stays the same: a rollover to the downside and a move back toward Trapline W (the 50% Fib level). Reassessmen…
❤1
On the macro view, we’re back in the TrapLine 3D area again — structurally it looks more like a support retest than a clean breakdown. There’s also a recurring pattern: every time price reaches a vertical Fibonacci time level, we often get a correction, followed by a return towards the middle of the range. We saw the same behavior during the previous bear phase. Now the trend has already shifted, and we’re basicall…
USDT D Here’s the setup I’m watching: a WXY double zigzag (double combo). Right now it looks like wave X is forming right under a descending trendline / resistance zone. This idea only remains valid if we DON’T take the previous high and DON’T break above the trendline. If that holds, the expected path is a (A–B–C) correction into wave Y, targeting Fibonacci levels: 38.2 — already basically tagged/worked, next ar…
If we look at the Trap Line, we’re basically testing it right now and still trading above it. That’s an important point — it can mean the bigger picture trend is not broken yet.
The daily oscillator has unloaded nicely — that’s a plus. But even looking at a small slice of history, ideally it should cool off even more for a cleaner setup. At the same time, an important point: we broke a key diagonal support. Price may not be far below the block, but the break itself is a fact. And the trend cloud has flipped back into bearish mode. So overall it doesn’t look great.
We’ve reached the blue zone and for now we can see some stabilization. But the sell-off was extremely fast — we barely got any proper bounces, price was pushed down almost nonstop. That’s not the most positive sign — sellers are clearly in control.
BTC has slipped below the midline, and that’s a key inflection point for the current structure. Right now it’s critical to reclaim that midline and hold back above it. As long as price stays below, the setup remains fragile and downside follow-through becomes more likely toward the next support zones.
BTC is testing a key rising trendline (support). There’s still a chance to hold it, but what we really need to see here is at least a pause / consolidation: a few sessions of basing, tighter range, and attempts to reclaim levels above the line. If we get that kind of “stall,” the market may soon give a clearer read on what comes next. For now, defending this trendline is a critical level for the current structure. …
LDO — pay attention to how the same scenario keeps repeating. Price regularly drops into the Axel Alts cloud and then crosses above Trap Line 3D (the red one). From there it depends on the context: depending on where Trap Line W is sitting, price either reclaims it quickly or pauses to “complete” the setup — and only after that do we usually see the impulse higher. I especially like the fact that Trap Line 3W has fi…
❤1
On the weekly timeframe (BTCUSDT), a buy signal has just appeared. One important nuance: after signals like this, a small pullback happens quite often — a quick retrace/mini correction before the market continues in the direction of the broader trend. Given the current structure, this still looks like a correction → continuation type of move. Also worth highlighting the oscillator: it’s well “unloaded” (reset) — it…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rumiancevEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rumiancev” (@rumiancevEN), 54 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rumiancevEN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.