Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

rumakura флипает🧢

@rumaflipaet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,172subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002046874826
TypeChannel
Username@rumaflipaet
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rumaflipaet

Growth

1,1721,1741,17312 Aug 2026, 21:16 — 1,174 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 02:15 — 1,172 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 21:1614 Aug 2026, 02:15
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,172–1,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:151,172-2
12 Aug 2026, 21:161,174first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

137 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4230.7%
custom 58321945027936294152719.7%
🐳1510.9%
🔥1410.2%
custom 5300819426650643314128.76%
custom 5472033358693280429107.30%
💩96.57%
👾75.11%
custom 547233998499847455710.73%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rumaflipaet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 April 2026 to 20 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 21:07 UTC602 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

эххх

custom 583219450279362941573💩1

13 Jun 2026, 18:10 UTC507 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пари реально такие тупые, Джейм берет авик у всех эко, все закупаются у Джейма эко, челы третью стадию мажора играют

2

2 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC439 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✍️ Пикемы печатают Помянем

3

2 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC394 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ставками на мажор делиться? 🎧

🐳2custom 54723399849984745571

27 May 2026, 09:55 UTC446 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Еще зарегайтесь в дропе от Luckio https://rolly.io/luckio?luckio_ref=6a04ce8cf50dae45c8bf0932 Писал где-то про них где то год назад , абузили их бонусы , много кто вынес по 10-30$

1

18 May 2026, 17:30 UTC562 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Только что с бота Gorilla забрал nft Попробуйте, может и вам повезет 🔥 49 приваток за 30$ | 🦔PARSER

4

8 May 2026, 17:58 UTC585 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Нашел крутую апку - GetBonus 💡 В апке мы выполняем задания и получаем реальные TON, которые можно спокойно выводить и тратить Что делать? -Заходим в бота 👈 -Выбираем подходящие задания -Выполняем задания и приглашаем друзей 💭 апка сделана хорошо , задания хоть и с вложениями и в основном БК , но выплаты хорошие , если все делать с умом ты выходит неплохой заработок 🔥 49 приваток за 30$ | 🦔PARSER

5custom 54720333586932804292custom 58321945027936294152

8 May 2026, 08:36 UTC479 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Так как TON начал свой бурный рост, подготовил для вас двух ботов, которые будем абузить на NFT-подарок ✉️ В кратце про ботов , это боты-казино , в каждом из них есть что то по типу ракетки , это мы не трогаем Что делать? Первый бот: GiftUP - заходим в бота 👈 Собираем ежедневный кейс за легкие задания Собираем промокоды в их канале Второй бот: Kingdoms - заходим в бота 👈 -Понадобиться деп 1 TON -Каждый день (чаще

🐳4🔥2custom 54720333586932804292

2 May 2026, 09:47 UTC510 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вчера был весь в работе, забыл вам закинуть ежемесячный Binance Box 🛒 Там еще TGE Billions 4 мая , надеюсь на 10$ 🔥 49 приваток за 30$ | 🦔PARSER

custom 530081942665064331464🔥3👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rumaflipaet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 712,911 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rumakura флипает🧢” (@rumaflipaet), 1,172 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rumaflipaet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.