Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
archives board
@rujaklambe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001595870631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rujaklambe |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rujaklambe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 1 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 52
- Links
- 39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 42.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2023 to 28 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
@Jaxkes JO : 10/10 soalnya gua yg buatin mb TI : to be honest si Jax ini ga seserem ketikan atau vibesnya, malah jamet asli ON : kali ini saya akan memperkenalkan salah satu dosen saya yang masih muda, panggil saja pak Jax. karena beliau ini masih muda, masih lajang dan bening ga heran kalau mahasiswi kampus pada tergila-gila, bahkan ga jarang dosen perempuan yg masih muda pun suka menggoda pak Jax, tapi di sisi l…
🥰1
Sticker, posted without a caption
@Cheziadiaksa JO : 10/10 cute bebeknya + i'll marry you. TI : to be honest zizi anaknya lucu, ga lembut but dia kalem, ga ketinggalan pula dia bisa diajak ghibah. ON : as crush halo disini saya mau memperkenalkan seseorang yang saya suka, he's chezian atau zizi untuk singkatnya, sebenernya itu panggilan kesayangan saya untuk dia haha. ok now, you must know how my crush is, he's small in stature with good body prop…
🥰1
Sticker, posted without a caption
@exhansohee JO : 10/10 pretty vintage + i'll fuck you. TI : to be honest dyxie tipe orang yang tidak segalak vibesnya, she's so mature bisa dilihat dari caranya berinteraksi dengan mutualnya. ON : as gf siapa wanita mempesona ini? ya perkenalkan dia pacar saya, perempuan saya, pendamping hidup saya, and also the person i love the most namanya dyxie, panggilan sayang biasanya princess cause she's beautiful like no …
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
@kbastardboy JO : 10/10 sudah cocok dengan vibesmu + i'll fuck you. TI : to be honest javier ga secuek yang saya kira, he's so friendly dan kelihatannya lembut. ON : as temen dari kecil mau kenalin ini temen saya dari janin namanya javier, iya dia udah jadi temen saya dari kecil karena orang tua kita juga saling berteman, dan memang rumah kita berdampingan, ya gumoh ga gumoh tiap hari ketemu bro satu ini. you must…
❤🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
@hokdben JO : 10/10 soft boy ya + i'll marry you. TI : to be honest gideon memiliki vibes yang ceria, saya kira bakal cuek ternyata easygoing. ON : as mantan gideon ini mantan saya yang masih terjalin komunikasi, walaupun udah putus hubungan bukan berarti putus silaturahmi bukan? haha, gideon dia tipe orang yang suka bikin orang darting karena tingkah jailnya, marah-marah ga jelas, but disisi lain he's warm inside…
Sticker, posted without a caption
@tHottiev JO : 10/10 sesuai dengan usernamenya, terlihat hot and elegant + i'll fuck you. TI : to be honest shanneta orangnya mudah untuk diajak berinteraksi, pembawaannya juga santai. ON : as tetangga yang kalem shanneta ini salah satu tetangga saya yang super kalem, belum pernah ngelihat dia marah atau mengeluarkan kata-kata kasar, saya sama temen-temen saya godain juga respon dia tetep lembut, she's younger tha…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rujaklambe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“archives board” (@rujaklambe), 1 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rujaklambe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.