Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Новости регби | Rugger.info

@ruggerinfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,096subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001127918259
TypeChannel
Username@ruggerinfo
Created15 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ruggerinfo

Growth

3,0963,0983,0976 August 2026 — 3,098 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,098 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,096 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,096–3,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:433,096-2
7 Aug 2026, 06:433,098no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:153,098first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 3,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
935
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,347
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9137.3%
👍5723.4%
3514.3%
😢187.38%
❤‍🔥156.15%
😁62.46%
👎52.05%
🏆41.64%
🤡41.64%
🥰31.23%
🤔20.82%
🤬20.82%
🎉10.41%
👏10.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC328 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📚🔖📝🗞️📙 Путешествие «Олл Блэкс» по Южной Африке стартует с матча против крепкой и неуступчивой команды из Кейптауна. 🎙️ — Кирилл Лобур @ruggerinfo https://vkvideo.ru/live-42170580_456244858

5❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC608 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤧 Простуда не щадит никого - даже звёзд «Олл Блэкс». Уоллес Ситити не сможет сыграть в первом матче тура Новой Зеландии в ЮАР. ➡️ Читать подробности @ruggerinfo

😢8🤔1🤬1

6 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC650 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🦈 Южноафриканские «Шаркс» сменили логотип в честь 30-летия профессиональной франшизы. Как вам обновление? @ruggerinfo

10👎5🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC736 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️💚❤️ Два вечера большого регби с Rugger.info. «Олл Блэкс» начинают турне по Южной Африке матчем против «Стормерс» — редкая возможность увидеть новозеландскую сборную в противостоянии с одним из ведущих клубов страны. На следующий день Аргентина примет Южную Африку. «Лос Пумас» постараются навязать борьбу действующим обладателям Кубка мира в очередном принципиальном тестовом матче. 📽️ Подключайтесь к прямым трансл

🔥195🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC661 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Грустите, болельщики «Тулузы», и радуйтесь, фанаты «Расинга 92»! 🔥🔥🔥 Всё решено: Тома Рамос перейдёт к «гонщикам» после следующего сезона. Рамос - воспитанник «Тулузы». Выиграл с командой 6 чемпионских титулов, 2 Кубка чемпионов и стал лучшим бомбардиом в истории. 🎧 Лучше надевайте наушники - громкость этого трансфера зашкаливает! @ruggerinfo

🔥132🥰2🤔1🤬1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC734 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Скучали? Смотрите, какую форму представила сборная ЮАР на матчи против Новой Зеландии! На регбийках написал гимн Южной Африки на пяти языках: коса, зулу, сесото, африкаанс и английском. Хотели бы такую себе в коллекцию? 🤩 @ruggerinfo

🔥25👍84🎉1

18 Jul 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,530 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Для «Лос Пумас» едва ли найдется более принципиальный соперник, нежели «Алые розы». Английская команда пребывает в приподнятом настроении после легкой прогулки с фиджийцами, но в Сантьяго-дель-Эстеро их ждет очень теплый прием. https://vkvideo.ru/video-42170580_456244856 @ruggerinfo

🔥10👍4

18 Jul 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,410 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Спрингбокс» уверенно прошли два стартовых раунда нового турнира и желают завершить июльскую часть очередной победой над многострадальными «Красными драконами», которые в последнее время начали подавать признаки жизни. https://vkvideo.ru/video-42170580_456244855 @ruggerinfo

🏆4👍1

18 Jul 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,340 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://vkvideo.ru/video-42170580_456244854 «Олл Блэкс» не проигрывают на «Иден Парке» уже 22 года и не собираются прерывать эту серию, пусть и в дуэли с неуступчивыми и волевыми Ирландцами. @ruggerinfo

👍10

16 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC≈1,350 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️ В заключительном раунде летней части Чемпионата наций вновь прогуляемся по Южному полушарию. 🇳🇿🇮🇪 Начнем игровой день на легендарном «Иден Парке» 🇿🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Переместимся в южноафриканский Дурбан 🇦🇷🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Закончим наше путешествие в аргентинском Сантьяго-дель-Эстеро. @ruggerinfo

🔥14👍2

13 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC≈1,160 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dynamo_rugPhoto

В динамовской семье случилась беда. У нашего специалиста по PR-коммуникациям Евгении Калиховой произошла страшная трагедия. В автомобильной аварии погиб её отец, а мама находится в больнице в тяжёлом состоянии. Женя каждый день работает для клуба, команды и болельщиков. И сейчас ей нужна наша помощь. Мы обращаемся ко всей бело-голубой семье и регбийному сообществу: давайте вместе поддержим Женю в этот тяжелейший п

😢10❤‍🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ruggerinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 865,163 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Новости регби | Rugger.info” (@ruggerinfo), 3,096 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruggerinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.