Canal de difusión de información y tuits. Si tenéis alguna información que pueda ser de interés general o alguna sugerencia/pregunta podéis contactarme en: [email protected]
Created
12 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Recorded in 2019 as “Difusión @rubnpulido 🇪🇸” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,887–14,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:44
14,906
-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:57
14,911
-5
11 Aug 2026, 18:52
14,916
-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:15
14,923
+4
9 Aug 2026, 22:16
14,919
+8
8 Aug 2026, 23:51
14,911
-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:25
14,913
+13
7 Aug 2026, 03:42
14,900
+8
6 Aug 2026, 07:10
14,892
-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:02
14,893
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
66.1%
avg views ÷ 14,906 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,860
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (27 May 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
59,160
Reactions total
2,356
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈620
Links
≈7,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12m 17s
Average length
6m 09s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,963 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,654
27.7%
🤬
1,226
20.6%
❤
1,012
17.0%
🔥
766
12.8%
👏
673
11.3%
💯
368
6.17%
🤮
177
2.97%
💩
23
0.386%
😈
12
0.201%
😡
7
0.117%
😢
7
0.117%
✍
6
0.101%
🫡
6
0.101%
🙏
5
0.084%
🥱
4
0.067%
🤯
3
0.05%
🍾
2
0.034%
🙈
2
0.034%
🤔
2
0.034%
🤡
2
0.034%
6 further kinds
6
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,963reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇮🇹 Hoy en portada del Secolo d’Italia.
Parece mentira que la amenaza a la seguridad nacional que supone lo que acontece en Ceuta sea más tenida en cuenta en Italia que en nuestro propio país.
La mayoría de la gente sigue sin ser consciente de lo que todo esto implica.
👉🏼 https://x.com/rubnpulido/status/2086830824343716217
Todo esto de Ceuta me tiene sobrepasado. Creo que la mayoría de la población no es consciente de la amenaza que todo esto supone para nuestro país. Ceuta no es solo una frontera, es el lugar donde se está decidiendo una parte del futuro de España. Os dejo esta reflexión de vuelta de mis "vacaciones". Os agradecería toda difusión posible, nos jugamos mucho en esto.
🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA || Ya son más de 2.000 los inmigrantes ilegales que han entrado a Ceuta en los últimos 12 días.
📹 Esta es la situación en los alrededores del CETI. La tensión aumenta, los efectivos de la Guardia Civil y de la Policía Nacional están sobrepasados.
⚠️ Sólo dentro del CETI ya hay más de 700 inmigrantes ilegales y en las inmediaciones más de 1.300 esperan a ser acogidos mientras deambulan por la ciudad.
…
🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA || Open Arms recorre casi 1.200 kilómetros para interceptar a 6 somalíes a unas 100 millas náuticas del litoral de Túnez.
👉🏼 https://x.com/rubnpulido/status/2079889004850184285
Sigue ocurriendo cada día. Solo en las dos primeras semanas de junio se han documentado casi 30 "casos aislados" de apuñalamientos, robos y violaciones vinculados a esta oleada de violencia importada en España. En los últimos meses asistimos a un aumento sostenido y cada vez más evidente de ataques con una clara connotación religiosa.
Cuando me preguntaron en el Parlamento Europeo cómo veo a España dentro de una déca…
🔴 ¡He dado un paso más en mi Patreon!
A partir de ahora, además de respaldar mi trabajo diario, podréis acceder a mis informes de análisis sobre inmigración, seguridad y fronteras: datos oficiales, metodología contrastable y, ante todo, rigor.
Arranco con dos ya disponibles:
🔹 El espejismo de los retornos: con datos de Eurostat, la distancia real entre las órdenes de retorno que dicta Europa y las que de verdad se…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rubnpulido. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 132,402 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Vito Quiles 🇪🇸 @vitoquilestelegram · 151,769 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Alvise Pérez @Alviseperez · 621,862 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
Wall Street Wolverine @wallstwolverine · 180,071 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rubén Pulido 🇪🇸” (@rubnpulido), 14,906 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rubnpulido.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.