Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ru_proxmox

Channel

ru_proxmox

@ru_proxmox_channel

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

390subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199551868
TypeChannel
Username@ru_proxmox_channel
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ru_proxmox_channel

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3893913903 September 2026 — 389 subscribers3 September 2026 — 389 subscribers4 September 2026 — 390 subscribers12 September 2026 — 391 subscribers28 September 2026 — 390 subscribers3 September 202628 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 26 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 389–391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 17:56390-1
12 Sept 2026, 02:37391+1
4 Sept 2026, 08:17390+1
3 Sept 2026, 04:46389no change
3 Sept 2026, 04:31389first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 15 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍538.5%
❤323.1%
🤝215.4%
👌17.69%
👎17.69%
🔥17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2024 to 20 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2025, 06:41 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

После того, как вы проголосовали в опросе, пожалуйста, напиши в чате сообщение и поставьте хэштег #хочустатьмодэратором

👎1

1 Aug 2025, 06:40 UTC992 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Чат, ищутся люди в модераторы. Желательно дальний восток, чтобы было смещение по часовому поясу. Несколько требований: +гражданин РФ (знает и понимает законы) + часовой пояс отличный от Москвы + активный участник чата

  1. Готов попробовать себя9%
  2. Хочу посмотреть результаты опроса80%
  3. Вариант для тех, кто уже модератор11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jul 2025, 22:13 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Чат, нас уже более 4000 людей, это приятная новость! Спасибо, что вы есть.

🤝2

12 Jul 2025, 10:42 UTC838 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

По возможности делайте пометку "@ru_proxmox, донат, домен". Надеюсь, банк не заморозит средства без пометки.

👌1

12 Jul 2025, 10:28 UTC692 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Приближается срок оплаты домена, если есть желание помочь с оплатой, то вот данные: Карта: 2204 3201 6124 2096 За реквизитами и(или) СБП писать сюда.

2 May 2025, 05:33 UTC877 viewsread 3 September 2026

Поддержите, пожалуйста, чат вашими бустами! https://t.me/boost/ru_proxmox

27 Dec 2024, 18:57 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 3 September 2026

Ищу хостинг, кто безвозмездно предоставит виртуальную машину для сайта сообщества. Если предоставите ресурсы для лаборатории сообществу - будет ещё лучше. По всем вопросам писать в личные сообщения @iacsvrn

6 Nov 2024, 18:17 UTC≈1,570 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Хотим обратить внимание, на голосовой чат сообщества, который запущен и работает. Также в опросе ниже просим ответить, нравится ли вам работа нового бота для защиты сообщества от спамеров.

  1. Да, нравится новый бот76%
  2. Иногда удаляет нужных людей14%
  3. Иногда удаляет нужные сообщения21%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤2

19 Jun 2024, 15:58 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Удобно ли сделаны темы в группе?

  1. Да61%
  2. Нет39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ru_proxmox_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2025, 06:40 UTCAnonymous Poll64 voters

Чат, ищутся люди в модераторы. Желательно дальний восток, чтобы было смещение по часовому поясу. Несколько требований: +гражданин РФ (знает и понимает законы) + часовой пояс отличный от Москвы + активный участник чата

  1. Готов попробовать себя9%
  2. Хочу посмотреть результаты опроса80%
  3. Вариант для тех, кто уже модератор11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2024, 18:17 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Хотим обратить внимание, на голосовой чат сообщества, который запущен и работает. Также в опросе ниже просим ответить, нравится ли вам работа нового бота для защиты сообщества от спамеров.

  1. Да, нравится новый бот76%
  2. Иногда удаляет нужных людей14%
  3. Иногда удаляет нужные сообщения21%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jun 2024, 15:58 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

Удобно ли сделаны темы в группе?

  1. Да61%
  2. Нет39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2024 to 20 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ru_proxmox” (@ru_proxmox_channel), 390 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ru_proxmox_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.