Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

История электронной музыки ✨ 12edit.ru

@ru12edit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,537subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146162961
TypeChannel
Username@ru12edit
Created4 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ru12edit

Growth

7,5377,5387,537.56 August 2026 — 7,538 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,538 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,537 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,537–7,538 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:457,537-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:197,538no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:467,538first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 7,537 subscribers
Avg views / post
811
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held39 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total31,631
Reactions total565
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
1m 49s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

565 reactions across 38 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26647.1%
🔥17531.0%
👍6211.0%
🥰193.36%
❤‍🔥183.19%
👏50.885%
💯50.885%
💔30.531%
😁30.531%
😍30.531%
🎉20.354%
😈20.354%
🆒10.177%
🤮10.177%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 39 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ru12edit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 39 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC293 views6 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Kraftwerk — Telephone Call • 1986, HD Рубрика #клип дня 🖥 Больше → в плейлисте

6

12 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC564 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вангелис показывает свою студию в Афинах (2008). Гвоздь программы — спроектированная по его заказу система YES AUDIO, за которой композитор как за пультом управления: подключает необходимые синтезаторы, меняет инструменты как перчатки, тут же регулирует их громкость, эффекты и пр, и все это — не вставая с кресла и не бегая по студии, потому что все уже настроено, подключено к консолям и постоянно пишется на хард — си

🔥95❤‍🔥3

11 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC616 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Норман Кук (он же Fatboy Slim) на фоне гардероба с любимыми рубашками в гавайском стиле. Наши дни. #фото

🔥234😁2

11 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC614 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Reel 2 Real feat. The Mad Stuntman – I Like To Move It • 1993, HD Рубрика #клип дня 🖥 Больше → в плейлисте

👍86

11 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC604 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На связи команда паблика и гостевой микс mareevaanna. Спектр на ближайшие полтора часа: от дип хауса до драм-н-бейса. Вспоминаем забытые пластинки, находим новые любимые треки.

2

11 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC598 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Гость 12/01: Mareevaanna * вк * ютюб * саундклауд

1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC644 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Группа Pet Shop Boys: Крис Лоу и Нил Теннант в образах для клипа Can you forgive her? 1993 год. #фото

🥰12👍2

10 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC660 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Benny Benassi pres. The Biz — Able to love • 2003, AI HD Рубрика #клип дня 🖥 Больше → в плейлисте

🔥3💔2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC705 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Манящее соединение турецкой этники и немецкой электроники. Собственно, турецкий — второй язык в Германии, если кто забыл. Петер Кульман отвечает здесь за гул, стук и бульк трех синтезаторов, Бурхан Очал — за виртуозную перкуссию, струнные и голос. Инициатор союза, Пит Намлук (тот же Кульман, только наоборот), каждым альбомом «Султана» выражал респект 700-летней оттоманской культуре. Эта пластинка посвящена основателю

🔥41

10 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC626 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sultan — Osman. Bir Çalgiyim Gögsüne Yaslanmis (Full album/1998) • Ambient/Tribal/Ethnics → вк • ютюб

8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC750 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Один из пионеров чикагской хаус-музыки — Маршалл Джефферсон — за работой. Конец восьмидесятых. #фото

23

8 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC743 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Morgan – Miss Parker • 1999, HD Рубрика #клип дня 🖥 Больше → в плейлисте

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @ru12edit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ru12edit edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 108,674 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“История электронной музыки ✨ 12edit.ru” (@ru12edit), 7,537 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ru12edit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.