Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 郑州95,蓉蓉小窝

Channel

郑州95,蓉蓉小窝

@rrzka112

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

107subscribers

+98 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003601425991
TypeChannel
Username@rrzka112
Created31 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live1 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrzka112

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9107581 September 2026 — 9 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11 subscribers10 September 2026 — 85 subscribers17 September 2026 — 95 subscribers1 October 2026 — 107 subscribers1 September 20261 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 13:54107+12
17 Sept 2026, 16:5995+10
10 Sept 2026, 09:5685+74
1 Sept 2026, 08:5311+2
1 Sept 2026, 05:159first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 1 September 2026

名字:蓉蓉 年龄:97年 身高:165 体重:50kg 🐻围 B 莞式95服务:4张40分钟(尽量现金) 课表内容: 全裸 调情 指滑 鼻吸 🐻滑 深喉 69互舔 舌尖漫游 舔蛋蛋 胸推 👅毒🐉 最后射嘴里(服务过程中出水算一次) 配合度高,莞式95服务,助洗不催 一次性毛巾,一次性床单,小区有课室 🈲毒🈲醉酒🈲氪💊🈲低素质 价格已经很低,谢绝议价,不包夜不上门 个人自聊,回复不及时请见谅 上班时间:下午1点—凌晨1点 约课联系: @rrzka111 个人频道: @rrzka112 双向解除: @rrzka109_bot

❤1

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @rrzka112. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“郑州95,蓉蓉小窝” (@rrzka112), 107 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrzka112.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.