Channel
@rrxfffx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
116subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002585215895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rrxfffx |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rrxfffx |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 116 | +40 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 76 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 75 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 75 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (10 September 2026 – 15 September 2026) |
| Views total | 434 |
| Reactions total | 129 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
205 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5427106544783224142 | 31 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5364021309225330669 | 28 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5364005499450715643 | 25 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5363823667715271591 | 23 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5427063015289680274 | 19 | 9.27% | |
| custom 5364186850149834051 | 18 | 8.78% | |
| custom 5386311214534006083 | 18 | 8.78% | |
| custom 5386755150943649590 | 14 | 6.83% | |
| custom 5819006114221528794 | 10 | 4.88% | |
| custom 5474346507819846218 | 9 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5217909180400169843 | 7 | 3.41% | |
| custom 5366100326799670842 | 3 | 1.46% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
надеюсь всем откликнулся этот пост,очень комплексую на самом деле своего оформления на фоне красивых каналов,но надеюсь вам нравится▶️◀️
custom 53863112145340060838custom 53867551509436495906custom 54271065447832241426custom 58190061142215287945
🌟🌟🌟🌟🕯️
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
custom 54743465078198462183custom 52179091804001698432custom 54271065447832241422custom 53863112145340060831
🕯️«Я боюсь, что среди тысяч чужих историй моя окажется незаметной. 🌷Но я всё равно буду оставлять здесь себя — не идеального,🪦 не похожего на других, не всегда понятного. 🤩Потому что мне не нужно быть лучше всех. Мне нужно быть собой настолько честно, чтобы однажды кто-то посмотрел на моё и подумал: 🤩🤩“Такого больше ни у кого нет”.»
custom 53867551509436495908custom 52179091804001698435custom 53863112145340060835custom 58190061142215287945custom 54271065447832241424custom 53661003267996708423custom 54743465078198462182
💙 💙💙 💙 #SUNSUN 💙💙💙💙💙 💙 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 . .🤩🤩🌕
custom 536402130922533066910custom 53638236677152715919custom 53640054994507156437custom 54270630152896802745custom 54271065447832241424custom 53641868501498340513custom 53863112145340060831custom 54743465078198462181
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53640213092253306694custom 53863112145340060831custom 54743465078198462181
⭐️⭐️ если кому то нужны рп пишите мне в лс @rafaellxxs, канал с отметкой @rafizzxs🤩
custom 54270630152896802748custom 53638236677152715914custom 53640054994507156434custom 53863112145340060831custom 54743465078198462181
🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦🪦 🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩 my cowboy boy . . 🌟 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 #SUNOO 🤩 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤
custom 54271065447832241427custom 53640054994507156436custom 53641868501498340515custom 53640213092253306694custom 53638236677152715912custom 53863112145340060831custom 54743465078198462181
File, posted without a caption
custom 53638236677152715915custom 53640054994507156435custom 53640213092253306694custom 54271065447832241424
🤩🤩🦴🦴🤩🤩
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩MY FRIENDS 🤩love you !! . . 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
custom 536418685014983405110custom 53640213092253306696custom 54270630152896802746custom 54271065447832241424custom 53638236677152715913custom 53640054994507156433
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rrxfffx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑹𝑭𝑿𝑫 𓆩影𓆪” (@rrxfffx), 116 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrxfffx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.