Channel
@rrvvlie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8,084subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001598077726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rrvvlie |
| Description | мой ангел хранитель сел за хранениеъ РЕКЛАМА НЕ ДЕЛАЕТСЯ!! вся инфа в первом закрепе! по всем вопросам в лс тгк! |
| Created | 23 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rrvvlie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 8,084 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 8,105 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 8,106 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 29 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15,872 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,781 | 55.3% | |
| 🍓 | 3,951 | 24.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3,140 | 19.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,872reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2025 to 21 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rrvvlie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 January 2025 to 21 June 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
продублирую и тут ребята, нет! больше никаких коммишек на фулл полноценки не будет( они очень изматывают и одна такая работа у меня выходит на часов 50 и соответственно я дохну от такой нагрузки 😱 единственная возможность заказать у меня что-то - это актуальный на данный момент аукцион(на скетчики). потом их тож не будет. возможно, буду брать один-два раз в полгода и все эра коммишек заканчивается🙏
🍓473❤148🔥108
дорогие друзья! обращаюсь щас ко всем, кто когда-либо рисовал мне гифты! месяц назад у меня снесли канал - это был архив, где лежали все ваши картинки с моим персонажем. многие я не сохраняла на телефон, а репостила непосредственно в тот канал, поэтому!!! огромная просьба, кто рисовал лэсса, хоть год назад, хоть два, даже если это всратый скетч на коленке, пожалуйста, скиньте картинку в комментарии с указанием вашег…
❤604🍓194🔥118
сегодняшний пост повернул всю историю мира и все платочники были изгнаны из монастыря теперь там есть фулл пей горна
❤583🔥176🍓131
еще чуть поближе кину я ненавижу тг за то что он так сильно портит качество картинки
🔥762❤327🍓222
комишко для замечательной заказчицы и ее книги!
❤1,510🔥420🍓328
рисовала стендик для конкурса в тсунами 🥺
🍓1,020❤342🔥239
еще гифты из анонки, спасибо!
❤866🍓281🔥204
💌 Анонимное фото: Если успела С днём рождения💐 В этом году лисенок яркий ↩️ Свайпни, чтобы ответить
🔥324❤168🍓112
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤103🔥27🍓24
💌 Анонимное фото: С днем рождения! Я очень люблю твое творчество и вдохновляюсь тобой я тя очень лю, иии я нарисовала гифт ↩️ Свайпни, чтобы ответить
❤338🍓123🔥69
представляете! у вашего админа сегодня дршка🙂 постов нет я пытаюсь поймать дзен
❤777🍓211🔥150
там мой хорошенький лися 👊👊
❤368🍓121🔥69
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rrvvlie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 443,868 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rrvvlie named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сенечкин 芥” (@rrvvlie), 8,084 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrvvlie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.