Channel
@rresw1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003654802092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rresw1 |
| Created | 21 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rresw1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 2 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 1 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 21 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,309 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6064522271815373654 | 414 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5364021309225330669 | 304 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5244938625069648248 | 277 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5364256411440148527 | 228 | 9.87% | |
| custom 5377455949747351603 | 221 | 9.57% | |
| custom 6269366931657069187 | 208 | 9.01% | |
| custom 5305585762312423378 | 147 | 6.37% | |
| custom 6305487975983617617 | 119 | 5.15% | |
| custom 5305243831376054068 | 115 | 4.98% | |
| custom 5418376890610129722 | 80 | 3.46% | |
| custom 5463244219223148107 | 76 | 3.29% | |
| custom 5418147612370962472 | 42 | 1.82% | |
| custom 5377750571618954505 | 41 | 1.78% | |
| custom 5197714776750328732 | 37 | 1.60% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,309 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 21 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩oshi . . 🤩
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 5244938625069648248136custom 6064522271815373654122custom 5364021309225330669108custom 537745594974735160342custom 519771477675032873237custom 530524383137605406836custom 626936693165706918736custom 630548797598361761736
Photo, posted without a caption
🩷 what u choose ? 🗡🗡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 6064522271815373654121custom 5364021309225330669112custom 5364256411440148527103custom 626936693165706918745custom 530524383137605406841custom 537745594974735160341custom 537775057161895450541custom 630548797598361761740
Photo, posted without a caption
🪦 you .. ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 6269366931657069187127custom 5244938625069648248100custom 536425641144014852788custom 536402130922533066943custom 537745594974735160339custom 530524383137605406838custom 541837689061012972238custom 530558576231242337837
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 606452227181537365444custom 536425641144014852737custom 546324421922314810733custom 54181476123709624726
dm @swerwq 🦭🦭🦭 🐏 hi 🎀 🥩🥩 🌟🌟 🔍🔍 🎧 me — 🎀oshi , 24.12 , 16 y.o , enfj 🔍🔍 🐏 ONLY 🐏 she / her 🎧🎧 🌟🌟🌟 🐏 🔠ore info : !!! 🌕🌕 my 🤍over 🐏@QU0S0K1NF0 🐏 🐏 🌟🌟
custom 6064522271815373654127custom 5305585762312423378110custom 537745594974735160399custom 546324421922314810743custom 630548797598361761743custom 541837689061012972242custom 524493862506964824841custom 536402130922533066941
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @rresw1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🤩oshi . . 🤩
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🩷 what u choose ? 🗡🗡
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🪦 you .. ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2026 to 21 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖥦 . Ꭵռf͜͡ꪮ ♡⃝⃜” (@rresw1), 2 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rresw1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.