Channel
@rpolosmak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001323751183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rpolosmak |
| Description | Контент о том, как выстраивать продажи экспертов и компаний. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 12 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rpolosmak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 48 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 48 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Коллеги, всем привет. Завтра 19 апреля в 17.00ч провожу онлайн-встречу для экспертов на тему: "Как эксперту получать 3-5 клиентов с одного выступления". Расскажу как я сделал такие рекорды: 🔥С 3х выступлений в регионе продал на 1 140 000 руб. 🔥Личный рекорд 17 заявок за 1 минутное выступление Кому актуально приходите завтра) Регистрация тут: https://polosmaktraining.ru/free-vebinar
https://t.me/prodazhiexpertov
Выложил в своём канале подробный разбор (в новом формате), как прогревается аудиторию в сторис самый раскрученный эксперт по инвестициям Ольга Гогаладзе.⤵️
Вот ссылка на канал.
Всем привет. Только что в новом канале (ссылка выше) рассказал, как увеличил за 1 день охваты в сторис почти в 2 раза. Переходи читай)
Ссылка на телеграм-канал для экспертов: https://t.me/prodazhiexpertov
Для тех, кому интересно узнать про продажи у экспертов- переходите с новый канал. Там ,кстати, делаю разборы именитых экспертов, как они подогревают свою аудиторию и ка они вообще продают
Друзья, я не планирую вести этот канал. Наконец-то понял, что хочу делиться информацией в другом формате- для экспертов в сфере услуг, тк сам такой)
Как думаете, в России возможны такие магазины?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
https://habr.com/ru/post/399725/
🤯ПРО ЛОМАНИЕ СТАНДАРТОВ: "КАК АМАЗОН СДЕЛАЛ МАГАЗИНЫ БЕЗ ПЕРСОНАЛА И КАСС" Прочитайте статью. В 2017 году Амазон реализовал первый такой магазин. Сейчас уже действует целая сеть.
Фокус на клиенте, нет страха ошибки, готовы постоянно тестировать новые гипотезы
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rpolosmak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете, в России возможны такие магазины?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2021 to 18 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О продажах для экспертов и компаний” (@rpolosmak), 48 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rpolosmak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.