ะะพะฒัะน ะณะพะด - ะฝะพะฒะฐั ะถะธะทะฝั.

Channel
๐ฐเพเฝฒเพเฝฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฒ๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ.
@royyalfam
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002074388589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @royyalfam |
| Description | ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐: @royalfamlifee ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ: @unionsroyalfam ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐๐ซ: @mrnsws @exselo ๐ซ๐จ๐ฒ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฉ ๐ ๐ข๐ซ๐ฅ: @royalgossipgirls |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 16 February 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/royyalfam |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 9 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 9 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 February 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
96 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 53 | 55.2% | |
| ๐คฎ | 11 | 11.5% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 8 | 8.33% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 6.25% | |
| ๐ฅ | 6 | 6.25% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.08% | |
| โก | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ฉ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐คก | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ฆ | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2024 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ะัั, ััััััะน
ะะธะฒั?
ะั ัะตัะธะปะธ, ััะพ ะฝะฐะผ ัะฝะพะฒะฐ ะฝะตะพะฑั ะพะดะธะผะพ ะพัะบัััััั ะกะฟะธัะพะบ ะฐะบััะฐะปัะฝัะน ะฑัะดะตั ะบะพะณะดะฐ-ะฝะธะฑัะดั, ะฝะพ ะฟะพะบะฐ ะตัะปะธ ะตััั ะถะตะปะฐะฝะธะต ะฒัััะฟะธัั โ @aiymsm @mrnsms
โคโ๐ฅ3โค2โก1
ะั ะบะฐะบ ะฒั, ะถะธะฒัะต?
๐ฉ1๐คก1๐คฎ1
!! ัะพัะปั ััะปะธ ะฒ ัะตัั.
โค1๐ฅ1
Channel photo updated
Sticker, posted without a caption
โค4๐ฅ2๐1๐ 1๐คฎ1
๐ฐเพเฝฒเพเฝฒ ::ษแดะฝัแดัแด แดฉแดแดงะธ: ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ฅ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง โ ๐๐๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ญ๐ณ๐ฆ๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐ญ ๐๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ ๐โ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง๐๐ฅโ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ก ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐ฐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐๐จ๐ง ๐๐จ-๐๐๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ๐๐ก ๐๐ข๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ก๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐๐ซ๐๐ฏ ๐๐ก๐จ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ค๐ก๐จ๐ง ๐๐ก๐ข๐ณ๐ง๐๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ค๐ฒโ ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐๐ซ๐ฒ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐๐ญ
โค6โคโ๐ฅ1๐ 1๐1๐คฎ1
ัััะปะบะฐ ะดะปั ะฐะฝะพะฝะธะผะฝัั ะฒะพะฟัะพัะพะฒ, ะฟัะตะดะปะพะถะตะฝะธะน, ะผะฝะตะฝะธะน ะธ ะฟัะพัะตะณะพ , ะบะฐัะฐััะตะณะพัั ะฝะฐัะตะณะพ ัะฐัะฐ t.me/anonaskbot?start=NHq8bXoEWHsgGkT
โค5๐1๐คฎ1๐ฅฐ1
๐ฐเพเฝฒเพเฝฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฒ๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ. pinned a photo
๐ะดะฝะธ แดฉะพะถะดแดะฝะธั ััแดแดแดะฝะธแดะพส๐ โข ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ๐๐ก || ๐๐.๐๐ โข ๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐๐ซ๐ญ || ๐๐.๐๐ โข ๐๐ก๐จ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง || ๐๐.๐๐ โข ๐๐ข๐๐ค ๐๐ซ๐๐ฒ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง || ๐๐.๐๐ โข ๐๐ข๐ค๐ฅ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง || ๐๐.๐๐
โค6โคโ๐ฅ1๐ 1๐คฎ1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @royyalfam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 642,522 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@royyalfam named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 13 August 2026 โ 13 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 โ 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 โ 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฐเพเฝฒเพเฝฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฒ๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ข๐ง๐๐จ.โ (@royyalfam), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royyalfam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.