Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Roy Reale

Channel

Roy Reale

@royreale

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,562subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003088017772
TypeChannel
Username@royreale
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/royreale

Growth

1,5581,5621,5606 August 2026 — 1,558 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,558 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,562 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,557–1,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:131,562+3
9 Aug 2026, 17:431,559+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:341,558no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:211,558first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.5%
avg views ÷ 1,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,430
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (5 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total12,870
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC700 viewsread 7 August 2026

La trappola dei grandi nomi della finanza Qualche giorno fa Michael Saylor, co-fondatore dell'azienda Strategy, ha fatto una dichiarazione piuttosto interessante. Se non hai avuto modo di leggere attentamente le sue parole, le trovi qui in corsivo: “Quando dico ‘non vendere mai i tuoi Bitcoin’, parlo da risparmiatore a risparmiatore. Io non ho mai venduto i miei Bitcoin. Nemmeno un satoshi. Strategy è una società

2 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC≈1,230 viewsread 7 August 2026

Promemoria Chi investe da tempo sa che non esiste nessun metodo, per quanto studiato e validato nel tempo, capace di azzerare il rischio di sbagliare. Questo vale nei tuoi investimenti così come in tutte le altre cose che fai nella vita. Il rischio puoi solo imparare a gestirlo. Questo implica accettare che non sei infallibile. Significa ammettere a te stesso che talvolta ti sbagli. E questa cosa qui, se ad un l

31 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 7 August 2026

SpaceX: nulla di nuovo sotto il Sole Questo canale telegram gratuito continua a fare un buon servizio per chi fra voi lo sta seguendo assiduamente. Con la consapevolezza che leggere e comprendere tutte le dinamiche in modo corretto è per me impossibile, gli indizi di mercato che vi sto anticipando in questo gruppo sono stati fin qui per un enorme 80-90% dei casi in piena sintonia con quel che è poi realmente accadu

31 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Grafico di SpaceX, ogni candela equivale ad una settimana.

28 Jul 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 7 August 2026

Il posto più vulnerabile di Internet sulla Terra Da qualche settimana lo stretto di Bab-el-Mandeb è salito alla ribalta della cronaca. Dal 20 luglio gli Houthi hanno messo in atto un "embargo marittimo” selettivo, per rappresaglia, indirizzato contro le navi collegate all’Arabia Saudita che volessero transitare nello Stretto. Hanno poi lanciato alcuni missili contro le installazioni della Saudi Aramco (la compagni

24 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,740 viewsread 7 August 2026

L’unico gallo a cantare C’è un articolo interessante di Robert Manning su Foreign Policy (The Slow Death of the Global Commons del 20 luglio), che osserva come la crisi di Hormuz potrebbe essere il preludio di una rottura della globalizzazione così come la conosciamo. Nazionalismi populisti in ascesa e politiche di sicurezza nazionali a somma zero (competizione piuttosto che collaborazione) stanno smantellando quel

23 Jul 2026, 21:49 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ulisse, per tornare a casa devi perdere il controllo, lasciarti andare e vivere.

22 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026

Questa volta la via d’uscita sarà diversa Questo grafico mostra la percentuale del debito pubblico degli Stati Uniti che è in mano ai creditori, privati ed esterni, rispetto alla ricchezza annuale prodotta dal Paese (PIL). Più questo grafico sale e più diventa difficile per l’economia statunitense sostenere il debito. Al momento in cui scrivo il grafico sta tornando sul suo massimo storico. Un massimo che era sta

17 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

Un lingotto vecchio 400 anni e le due lezioni che mi porto a casa Qualche giorno fa sul suo profilo Twitter Mike Maloney ha condiviso questa immagine. È un sub che insieme al suo team, al largo delle Florida Keys ha recuperato da un relitto un lingotto d'argento di 22 libbre (circa 10 kg), del valore stimato tra i 50mila e 100mila dollari (più numismatico che valore del solo metallo che si attesta intorno ai 21mila

15 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 7 August 2026

I tassi di interesse stanno giocando col fuoco In questo grafico si vede l'andamento dei tassi di interesse sui titoli di Stato decennali degli USA. Si tratta di uno dei dati più importanti del mondo. L'economia globale oggi si regge sul debito e un forte aumento dei tassi di interesse porterà una pressione che secondo i miei calcoli diventerà ad un certo punto insostenibile per molti Stati. Si sta avvicinando il

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @royreale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 175,270 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Roy Reale” (@royreale), 1,562 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royreale.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.