Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Royal Arts🔥

Channel

Royal Arts🔥

@royal_arts1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,722subscribers

-133 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001317931921
TypeChannel
Username@royal_arts1
Created13 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/royal_arts1

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,72213,85513,788.56 August 2026 — 13,855 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,854 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,847 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,844 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,842 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,841 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,836 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,837 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,832 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,830 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,825 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,829 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,834 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,832 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,833 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,834 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,832 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,829 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,826 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,825 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,821 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,822 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,815 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,812 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,804 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,801 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,815 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,810 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,806 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,796 subscribers2 October 2026 — 13,791 subscribers7 October 2026 — 13,787 subscribers11 October 2026 — 13,770 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,759 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,756 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,752 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,746 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,745 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,739 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,736 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,734 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,728 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,725 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,726 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,722 subscribers6 August 202628 October 2026
46 measurements spanning 83 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,702–13,875 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 07:4813,722-4
27 Oct 2026, 10:3713,726+1
26 Oct 2026, 11:0513,725-3
25 Oct 2026, 11:1513,728-6
24 Oct 2026, 10:5413,734-2
23 Oct 2026, 13:2713,736-3
22 Oct 2026, 12:4013,739-6
20 Oct 2026, 02:5613,745-1
18 Oct 2026, 02:4913,746-6
16 Oct 2026, 01:1813,752-4
15 Oct 2026, 03:5713,756-3
14 Oct 2026, 01:0713,759-11
11 Oct 2026, 07:5513,770-17
7 Oct 2026, 00:3713,787-4
2 Oct 2026, 05:5513,791-5
18 Sept 2026, 12:5513,796-10
16 Sept 2026, 06:1913,806-4
14 Sept 2026, 13:1513,810-5
11 Sept 2026, 03:1913,815+14
8 Sept 2026, 04:3513,801first reading

Engagement

190 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 190 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,502 reactions across 154 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,01940.7%
🔥1,00740.2%
😁27511.0%
👍1144.56%
🤔582.32%
😍291.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 157 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.58%
3 of 190 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
456
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
582
over 187 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFH674BK120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFJ4hhL5117 August 202617 August 2026
2W5zFJTxxQy16 August 20266 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC305 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Royal_Anime #Cat

😍5❤1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC511 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #DC #Teen_Titans #Raven #Rule63 Artist: Q Tori / Qt0ri / QTori

🤔10❤3

2 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC666 views19 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Star_Wars #Darth_Vader by Francesco Mattina

❤13👍4🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC708 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Royal_Cartoons #Kim_Possible #Shego Artist: Hannah Alexander Artwork / HannahArtwork

🔥16❤10

2 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC811 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Virtual_YouTuber #Hololive #Hololive_EN #Mori_Calliope Artist: hh / hehexd06161704

❤15🔥3🤔2

1 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC836 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Royal_Cartoons #Treasure_Island Artist: Mossa / Mossacannibalis / Mscnbls

🔥18❤2👍2

1 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC858 views18 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Royal_Anime #Konosuba Artist: 異澤 / Bhive003 (Izawa Koushi)

❤14😁4

1 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC776 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #Elves by Sunako-Art / Sunakoart (Sunako Veera)

❤22🔥8👍3😍1

1 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC826 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts by HIRO28227036

😁11🔥6❤3

1 Sept 2026, 06:20 UTC875 views23 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts #The_Witcher #The_Witcher_Ronin #Yennefer #Geralt #Geralt_of_Rivia #Ciri #Cirilla Artist: Jhonyknight (Jhony Caballero)

❤12🔥11

1 Sept 2026, 01:45 UTC729 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Arts by Nesskain hks

❤8🔥6🤔3

31 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC807 views14 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

#Royal_Cosplay #Royal_Manga #Chainsaw_Man #Denji by sheng_of_astora

🔥11👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @royal_arts1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Royal Arts🔥” (@royal_arts1), 13,722 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/royal_arts1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.