Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СК «Ротор»

@rotor_official

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,932subscribers

+105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001728785546
TypeChannel
Username@rotor_official
DescriptionОфициальный Telegram-канал СК «Ротор» 📲 Наша группа ВК: https://vk.com/fc.rotor 6050428787
Created13 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rotor_official

Growth

16,81316,93216,872.56 August 2026 — 16,827 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,828 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,818 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,813 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,851 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,877 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,879 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,932 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net +105. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,795–16,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:4516,932+53
13 Aug 2026, 23:4716,879+2
12 Aug 2026, 18:3316,877+6
10 Aug 2026, 15:2416,871+20
9 Aug 2026, 18:4316,851+38
8 Aug 2026, 18:3016,813-5
7 Aug 2026, 15:1016,818-10
6 Aug 2026, 13:1016,828+1
6 Aug 2026, 09:3716,827first reading

Engagement

120 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.4%
avg views ÷ 16,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
120 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
120
of 120 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held120 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total271,904
Reactions total5,897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13,300
Videos
2,780
Links
2,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 06s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,897 reactions across 120 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,99633.8%
👍1,45824.7%
❤‍🔥87514.8%
👎3185.39%
🎉2273.85%
😁2273.85%
🤬2273.85%
👏1001.70%
🤔861.46%
😢851.44%
🤯791.34%
💔601.02%
🍓500.848%
😱330.56%
🥰260.441%
😎240.407%
😍200.339%
🤩60.102%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,897reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 120 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rotor_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 120 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC451 views12 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

А вот и фотоотчёт прошедшей встречи 📸 Полный альбом доступен по ссылке: clck.ru/3VEwQM 👈

🎉8👎2❤‍🔥1😁1

15 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC862 views69 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вручили Николаю Покидышеву подарок от болельщика, пожелавшего остаться неизвестным ❤️

👍50🔥11❤‍🔥5🎉3

15 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,060 views90 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Никита Чагров и Золотой мяч 😱 После матча #РоторУрал вручили Никите заслуженную награду лучшего игрока прошедшего сезона в Лиге PARI ❤️

🔥72👍11❤‍🔥4🤔3

15 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,170 views89 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вчера Абу-Саид Эльдарушев провёл 2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣-й матч в карьере 🔝 Поздравляем Абу-Саида и желаем ему ещё больше матчей и голов! 👏

❤‍🔥70👍12🥰4🎉2🍓1

15 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,280 views21 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вчера перед матчем с «Уралом», мы вместе с нашими друзьями — брендом «DLYA KOJI DA» наградили наших болельщиков 🎆 Три счастливчика, чьи косплеи больше всех понравились Тимуру Аюпову получили подарочные наборы от «DLYA KOJI DA»! 🎀

❤‍🔥15👍4🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,400 views44 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Символический удар перед матчем #РоторУрал сделала Валерия — победительница нашего розыгрыша среди владельцев абонементов на трибуну А 🤝

😁22👍12🤯5🤬3🔥2

14 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,830 views36 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Пресс-конференция тренеров по итогам матча «Ротор» — «Урал» 🎙

👍25🤔7🍓2🔥1🤯1

14 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈3,590 views170 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ничья в меньшинстве сегодня на «Волгоград Арене» ⚔️

🔥110👏24👍11👎11🤬7🎉4🍓1🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC≈2,570 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⏱️9️⃣0️⃣+ 🟨 Умникову #РоторУрал | ⚽️1️⃣⚔️1️⃣⚽️

💔28😱2❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈2,470 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⏱️9️⃣0️⃣ К основному времени матча добавлено 4️⃣ минуты #РоторУрал | ⚽️1️⃣⚔️1️⃣⚽️

🔥20👍3❤‍🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,560 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⏱️7️⃣8️⃣ Цараев ➡️ Умников #РоторУрал | ⚽️1️⃣⚔️1️⃣⚽️

🤬28🔥5❤‍🔥3🎉1😱1

14 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC≈2,520 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⏱️7️⃣8️⃣ 🟨 Хохлачеву #РоторУрал | ⚽️1️⃣⚔️1️⃣⚽️

🤬27👎2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @rotor_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTCAnonymous Quiz574 voters

В какой стране в 2012 году была выпущена монета, посвящённая Виктору Цою?

  1. Республика Фиджи16%
  2. Северная Корея28%
  3. Южная Корея38%
  4. Вьетнам17%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz530 voters

Назовите песню, в которой звучали эти строки: «Соседи приходят, им слышится звук копыт»

  1. «Невесёлая песня моя»21%
  2. «Красно-жёлтые дни»18%
  3. «Кукушка»12%
  4. «Спокойная ночь»49%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Quiz604 voters

Как с корейского языка переводится фамилия Цой?

  1. Высота25%
  2. Долгожитель29%
  3. Талант28%
  4. Гений18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz620 voters

Какую песню группы «Кино» исполнила на концерте в Москве группа «Metallica»?

  1. «Группа крови»58%
  2. «Звезда по имени Солнце»25%
  3. «Спокойная ночь»6%
  4. «Восьмиклассница»11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz681 voters

Виктор Цой являлся основателем и лидером группы «Кино». А в какой ещё группе играл Виктор Робертович?

  1. «Рок-н-ролл»15%
  2. «Автоматические удовлетворители»21%
  3. «АлисА»20%
  4. «Кочегарка»44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz719 voters

Как называются миниатюрные японские фигурки, которые профессионально умел вырезать Виктор Цой?

  1. Клёцки15%
  2. Манцки14%
  3. Нэцкэ56%
  4. Дэнцки14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,049 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Волгоград
@vlgchp · 120,037
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 14 August 2026
Жесть Волгограда
@ghestvolgograd · 103,643
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
V1.RU | Новости Волгограда
@newsv1 · 133,685
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СК «Ротор»” (@rotor_official), 16,932 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rotor_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.