4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,274–2,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:13
2,274
-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:27
2,275
-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:52
2,276
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:51
2,276
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 2,274 subscribers
Avg views / post
459
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
19 (1 February 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
459
Reactions total
16
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 05m
Average length
20m 38s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
468 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
139
29.7%
👏
75
16.0%
👍
69
14.7%
🔥
39
8.33%
💯
29
6.20%
❤🔥
27
5.77%
🙏
16
3.42%
😁
13
2.78%
😢
12
2.56%
🤣
10
2.14%
👌
7
1.50%
👎
6
1.28%
💩
4
0.855%
🥰
4
0.855%
🏆
3
0.641%
🥴
3
0.641%
⚡
2
0.427%
😭
2
0.427%
🤓
2
0.427%
🤡
2
0.427%
4 further kinds
4
0.855%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roter_lotus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 February 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📖 UNREGIERBAR IST ERHÄLTLICH
Ab heute ist „UNREGIERBAR – Eine Abrechnung mit dem Glauben an Autorität“ offiziell veröffentlicht und bereits direkt im BoD-Buchshop erhältlich.
Amazon und die weiteren Buchhandlungen dürften in den kommenden Tagen nachziehen. Die üblichen digitalen Zahnräder müssen sich offenbar erst noch in Bewegung setzen.
Wer das Buch ohnehin bestellen möchte, unterstützt das Projekt mit einem Kau…
UNREGIERBAR ist jetzt im Druckprozess.
Bevor das Buch offiziell freigegeben wird, kommt noch das gedruckte Probeexemplar.
Nicht als Formalität, sondern als letzter Realitätscheck:
Papier, Cover, Haptik, Satzbild, Druckqualität und Gesamteindruck.
Wenn alles passt, erscheint UNREGIERBAR am 1. August.
Die erste Ausgabe erscheint bewusst gedruckt.
Nicht als Datei.
Nicht als Bildschirmtext.
Nicht als flüchtiger Down…
(Alternativ können Deutsche Untertitel eingestellt werden;)
Mark Passio "Shadow Work Seminar"
👉https://youtube.com/watch?v=Iouo8LQKoLQ&is=vA0HiwzI1ilKGVEK
DAME 🎵 DEINE HÄNDE 💔🐾
"Wann hört der Wahnsinn auf, wann nimmt das Leid sein Ende,
sieh statt nur zum TV doch mal auf deine Hände.
Und überleg dir was du damit alles verändern kannst
und denk daran, wer was bewegen will, fängt bei sich selber an."
👉Videoquelle
~☆~
@EhrfurchtVorAllemLeben💚🐾
🌸 Frühlings - Flyer - Aktion 2026 - Euroschein Flyer - Bundle (6 Designs) 100 Stück - NUR 15,- EUR (inkl. der Versandkosten)
(Für die mobile Ansicht hier geht es zum Video falls ihr es nicht schon sehen könnt.)
Mindestens 100 Flyer pro Bestellung aus allen 6 Design's gemischt.
(Kein Anspruch auf exakte Abzählung, das heißt mindestens 100 Stück, aber nicht zwingend gleichmäßig aufgeteilt in alle 6 Design's.)
Lieferu…
PIKAYZO - SO WIE WIR (prod. by Veysigz)🐻🐺🐾
"So wie wir“ ist ein emotionaler Deutschrap-Song über Tierrechte, Empathie und die Frage, warum wir Lebewesen lieben – und gleichzeitig ihr Leid ignorieren. Der Track setzt ein klares Zeichen gegen Tierausbeutung, Massentierhaltung und Profit auf Kosten von fühlenden Wesen.
Tiere fühlen wie wir. Sie spüren Schmerz, Angst und den Wunsch nach Freiheit – genau wie wir Mensche…
Wegweiser zu den Themen:
• Trivium
• Weltsichtspaltung
• Gedankenkontrolle
• Was ist die Wahrheit
• Naturrecht, Kausalität und die paradoxe Bestrafung des Guten
• Karma: Ursache und Wirkung
• Falsche und echte Anarchie
• Über Symbole, Projektionen und Bedeutungsfantasien
• Sektentypische Parallelen im Etatismus
• Gespräche mit Etatisten
• Mehrheit ist kein Qualitätsmerkmal
• Wie lösen sich Traditionen auf…
In diesem speziellen Vortrag, analysiert Mark Passio die vielen falschen Formen des so genannten "Anarchismus".
Im Anschluss geht er tiefer auf die psychologischen Zustände dieser falschen „Anarchisten” ein und deckt die vielen religiösen Gedankenformen auf, die sie davon abhalten, die ursächlichen Faktoren für den gegenwärtigen Zustand der menschlichen Versklavung genau zu verstehen.
Diese Präsentation wird den Zu…
Operation Trust (1921–1926, Sowjetunion)
„Operation Trust“ war eine gezielte Geheimdienst-Operation der sowjetischen Tscheka/OGPU. Man erschuf eine fiktive Untergrundbewegung, die vorgab, gegen die Bolschewiki zu arbeiten.
Ziel: Echte Regimegegner identifizieren, Exil-Opposition beruhigen und kontrollieren, Widerstand kanalisieren, überwachen und neutralisieren, Zeit gewinnen und Gegner in falscher Sicherheit wiege…
👍16❤7💯4🤣3🤓2👎1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @roter_lotus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 244,618 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@roter_lotus named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ehrfurchtvorallemleben named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roter Lotus” (@roter_lotus), 2,274 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roter_lotus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
