Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for розврия

Channel

розврия

@roswriasedits

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002125812770
TypeChannel
Username@roswriasedits
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/roswriasedits

Growth

223224223.56 Aug 2026, 22:41 — 224 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:03 — 224 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:31 — 223 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:417 Aug 2026, 18:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:31223-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:03224no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:41224first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

617 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35757.9%
🍓8814.3%
🔥548.75%
❤‍🔥386.16%
💋315.02%
💘284.54%
🏆182.92%
💯30.486%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 6 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
87
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
87
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roswriasedits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2025 to 6 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Jul 2025, 12:23 UTC≈1,360 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ну конкретно для моих целей достаточно разобраться в интерфейсе, там очень примитивное моделирование. вбивала туторы по конкретному запросу, там curtain reveal animation, perfume bottle tutorial. активно что-то в нем начала делать только в июне исключительно для этого эдита

32🍓9

6 Jul 2025, 12:17 UTC≈1,300 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

неа, обычный рендер через ананас handbrake

20❤‍🔥3

6 Jul 2025, 12:14 UTC≈1,120 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

например, эти фотки дали мне идею для 3д моделирования

❤‍🔥2013💋3🍓1

6 Jul 2025, 12:14 UTC932 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спасибо, мне приятно! я ОЧЕНЬ много листаю пинтерест… у меня отдельная доска для эдитинга, поэтому в моей ленте постоянно отображаются различные рисунки, фотографии, работы по типографии, коллажам и графическому дизайну в целом. у меня там хаотичное сборище всего на свете, которое очень помогает

29💋9

6 Jul 2025, 11:26 UTC861 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое за комплименты! ❤️ касаемо времени я уже ответила в первом сообщении, растянула на месяц. насчет вдохновения я не знаю что сказать 😭 перед тем как начать эдит, я четко продумываю хотя бы приблизительно что конкретно я хочу воплотить в реальность. наверное именно этот пошаговый план в голове и мотивирует меня, так как потом уже во время работы я стремлюсь к определенной картинке, нежели чему-то непонят

22❤‍🔥4🍓2

6 Jul 2025, 10:01 UTC851 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

спасибо большое! ❤️ я начала делать эдиты еще где-то в далеком 2019. начинала я с левой приложухи cute cut pro, где нет даже блюра или возможности сделать собственные графики ПХАХАХА. потом быстро перешла на алайт, после чего очень долго работала в видео старе. первый эдит в ае был выполнен в 2023 году. выгорание было… буквально мое полугодовое отсутствие с ним связано 😭 на фоне экзаменов я потеряла мотивацию занима

29💘5💋4❤‍🔥1

6 Jul 2025, 09:57 UTC875 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

я не считаю количество часов, всегда по-разному. у меня всегда был достаточно медленный темп работы( В СРЕДНЕМ я эдиты растягиваю на неделю или две, но конкретно предыдущий я начала еще месяц назад, ведь мне пришлось с нуля осваивать две программы и делать много анимаций. раньше могла оооооочень долго сидеть за компьютером, сейчас поняла, что отвыкла. я садилась так… через день или два на часика 2-3 без фанатизма. но

29💘9🔥3💋1

6 Jul 2025, 09:16 UTC934 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

давайте вопросики 🐾

🍓12❤‍🔥3💘31

5 Jul 2025, 21:09 UTC≈3,190 views267 reactions87 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

#эдиты 🍒

135🍓64🔥51❤‍🔥7💘4💯3💋2🏆1

5 Jul 2025, 21:08 UTC≈1,010 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

не судите строго я полгода отдыхала

🏆17💋61💘1

5 Jul 2025, 21:08 UTC942 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

22💋6💘3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @roswriasedits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 801,181 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“розврия” (@roswriasedits), 223 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roswriasedits.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.