Channel
@roswqi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
138subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002048001219 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roswqi |
| Created | 19 December 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roswqi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 138 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 140 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 141 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 141 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 19 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
187 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5440452451280896588 | 53 | 28.3% | |
| 🕊 | 45 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5168062953898902207 | 25 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5363962064446438808 | 18 | 9.63% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 5.35% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 4.81% | |
| custom 5362027718550501557 | 8 | 4.28% | |
| custom 5323702303734114737 | 7 | 3.74% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 2.67% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 1.07% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.535% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.535% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2023 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Факт № 5 А вы знали, что люди видят вас в реальности в среднем на 40% красивее, чем вы смотрите в зеркало или в камеру? Камера часто искажает пропорции, а зеркало показывает вашу внешность зеркально-перевернутой, а не так, как вас видят другие. Доверяйте не объективам, а живому взгляду.
🕊4🆒1
⠀⠀ׄ ⠀⠀۪⠀⠀roswqi ⠀𑄽୧⠀⠀𓈒⠀ 𝆭
🕊11
— ୨୧ — 𝑨𝒓𝒆 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒎𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒎𝒚 𝒃𝒂𝒄𝒌? 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕 𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒓𝒆 𝒎𝒚 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒆𝒄𝒕 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 — ୨୧ — rosׄwִqi
🕊8
Факт № 4 Лучше выйти без мейкапа, чем с грязными волосами. Твой фильтр на чистоту должен работать всегда.
🕊8👻2🆒1
Факт № 3 Можно надеть на себя самый дорогой бренд, но грязная обувь выдаст в тебе человека, который не умеет держать порядок даже в собственной жизни. Дисциплина начинается с подошвы.
🕊7🆒2👻1
Факт № 2 Люди которые стараются сделать всех счастливыми, в итоге часто остаются самыми одинокими
👻6👀1🕊1🆒1
Факт № 1 Черные носки на парнях ощущаются как ментальная неопрятность. Это база, которую многие игнорируют, но мой фильтр на чистоту такое не пропускает
🕊6
ɞⲥᥱ 𑄜 ꪒюδɞᥙ | rosׄwִqi
custom 516806295389890220725custom 53620277185505015578
🩸🅰️🩸🩸🩸🅰️🩸🩸🩸🩸 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔠ладедец - @roswiq🤍 🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 ❤️ Ин🔡🔠 - @Inforosw 🪦
custom 544045245128089658853custom 536396206444643880818⚡10custom 53237023037341147377🐳3🍌2🎉1
Channel created
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @roswqi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 519,518 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@roswqi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗥𝗼𝘀𝘄𝗾𝗶’𝘀 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵” (@roswqi), 138 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roswqi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.