پاسخ به چالش امروز روشنک فلاح روانشناس بالینی زوج درمانگر مشاوره خانواده عضو نظام روانشناسی ایران عضو انجمن روانشاسی آمریکا مشاوره انلاین https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
❤3
Signed Roshanak Fallah

Channel
@roshanak_fallah_psy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,250subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002109564222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roshanak_fallah_psy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 1,250 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 1,252 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 1,258 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 1,256 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 1,251 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 1,251 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (25 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,276 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پاسخ به چالش امروز روشنک فلاح روانشناس بالینی زوج درمانگر مشاوره خانواده عضو نظام روانشناسی ایران عضو انجمن روانشاسی آمریکا مشاوره انلاین https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
❤3
Signed Roshanak Fallah
سلام وروزتون بخیر امروز 7,شهریور 1405ساعت ،21درخدمت شما عزیزان هستیم با موضوع آلزایمر پیشا پیش ازوقتی که برای پاسخگویی میگذارید سپاسگزارم ❤️🌹 دوستان به سوالات زیر پاسخ دهید آلزایمر باازدست دادن حافظه کوتاه مدت وفراموش،کردن آدرس ها اسم ها ،آغاز میشود وکم کم تا آنجا پیش میرود که فرد حتی راه بازگشت به خانه را فراموش میکند دوستان باتوجه به توضیحات داده شده به سوالات زیر پاسخ دهید 1_آیا آلزایمر قابل پیشگیری میبا…
Signed Roshanak Fallah
https://newselfapp.ca/t/1571
❤1
Signed Roshanak Fallah
سلام عزیزم استاد توانمند و تشکر از موضوع بسیار خوبی که انتخاب کردید و موضوعی که اینروزها با توجه به فشارهای جامعه میبینیم و منشأ اصلی این افکار معمولاً باورهای عمیق و الگوهای ذهنی قدیمی است که در طول زندگی، بهویژه از تجربههای کودکی، روابط مهم و نیازهای برآوردهنشده شکل گرفتهاند. وقتی فرد در موقعیتی قرار میگیرد که این باورها فعال میشوند، ممکن است بهصورت خودکار جملاتی مثل «نمیتوانم»، «دست خودم نیست» یا «بدون ا…
Signed Roshanak Fallah
گاهی اتفاق می افتد که ما در یک بن بست فکری قرار می گیریم به اسم تله های زندگی! آیا تابحال در شرایطی قرار گرفتید که از جملات زیر استفاده کنید؟ 💥"دست خودم نبود" 💥"به هيچوجه نميتونم" 💥"به همه ثابت مي كنم" 💥"بدون اون مي ميرم" به نظرتان منشا اصلی تراوش این افکار چیست؟ با ما باشید همراهان گرامی تا درطول روز از نقطه نظرات ارزشمندتان بهره ببریم و در ساعت ۹ شب باهم یک جمع آوری داشته باشیم. دیدگاه و نقطه نظرات شما قوت قلب …
Signed Roshanak Fallah
بعضی گفتگوها تمام میشوند، اما ذهن ما همچنان آنها را ادامه میدهد؛ چندبار مرورشان میکنیم، جوابهای نگفته را پیدا میکنیم و مدام به «ای کاش...» برمیگردیم. @roshanak.fallah.psy @roshanak.fallah.psy اما قرار نیست هر گفتوگویی را تا بینهایت در ذهنمان تکرار کنیم. گاهی باید پذیرفت که یک مکالمه تمام شده و ادامهدادنش فقط آرامش ما را میگیرد. 🌱 شما هم پیش آمده یک گفتوگو را بارها در ذهنتان مرور کنید؟ #روانشناسی #آرام…
❤1
Signed Roshanak Fallah
شما میتوانید فردی خوب با قلبی مهربان باشید و درعینحال « نه » بگویید. از همان روزی که شروع کنید مرز بگذارید و« نه »بگویید، می فهمید چه کسانی واقعا دوستتان داشتند و چه کسانی فقط به فداکاری هایتان عادت کرده بودند. سلام دوستان عزیز. و روزتون بخیر 💚 https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
❤2
Signed Roshanak Fallah
روشنک فلاح روانشناس بالینی زوج درمانگر مشاوره خانواده عضو نظام روانشناسی ایران عضو انجمن روانشاسی آمریکا مشاوره انلاین https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
❤2
Signed Roshanak Fallah
613926 روشنک فلاح روانشناس بالینی زوج درمانگر مشاوره خانواده عضو نظام روانشناسی ایران عضو انجمن روانشاسی آمریکا مشاوره انلاین https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
❤1
Signed Roshanak Fallah
🌺🍂🍃🌺🍃🍂🌺🍃🍂☞۶۱۳۹۲۶ 🍃🌺🍃🍂 🍂🍃🌺 🌺🍂 🌺 🍂 مشاور شما : سرکار خانم روشنک فلاح @Roshanakfallah مشاور شما : سرکار خانم سبزواری @sabzevari1441 شرح مشکل : سلام من با پسری ک خیلی دوستش دارم دوست هستم و خانواده در جریان این دوستی نیستند و اگه بفهمند مطمینا بلوایی برپا خواهد شد برای همین دست ب دامن شما میشم ک مرا یاری کنید.من حدود 1ماه پیش برای اولین بار با دوست پسر رابطه جنسی برقرار کردم درطی این رابطه اتفاق خاصی نیوفت…
Signed Roshanak Fallah
613914 روشنک فلاح روانشناس بالینی زوج درمانگر مشاوره خانواده عضو نظام روانشناسی ایران عضو انجمن روانشاسی آمریکا مشاوره انلاین https://www.instagram.com/roshanak.fallah.psy https://t.me/roshanak_fallah_psy
Signed Roshanak Fallah
🌺🍂🍃🌺🍃🍂🌺🍃🍂☞۶۱۳۹۱۴ 🍃🌺🍃🍂 🍂🍃🌺 🌺🍂 🌺 🍂 مشاور شما : سرکار خانم روشنک فلاح @Roshanakfallah شرح مشکل : من3ساله بایه پسری دوستم ناراحتیایی داشتیم خوشحالی هایم داشتیم قراربود بعد سربازی بیاد خواستگاریم تا اینکه ازفروردین به این ور یه جدای پیش اومد من به ایشون نه زنگ زدم نه اس دادم فقط25روز توعالم تنهای خودم بود بعد25نظرش عوض شد دیدش نسبت به زنا ودختر برگشت گفت بی معرفتن بعد اون گفت ازدواج نمیکنم ولی باهم دوستیم میتون…
Signed Roshanak Fallah
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @roshanak_fallah_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روشنک فلاح-روانشناس بالینی” (@roshanak_fallah_psy), 1,250 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roshanak_fallah_psy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.