Channel
@roseriety
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
9subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003668839648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roseriety |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 1 February 2026โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roseriety |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 9 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 9 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 February 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
112 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 35 | 31.3% | |
| ๐ | 15 | 13.4% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 12.5% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 12.5% | |
| ๐ | 11 | 9.82% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 8.04% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 6 | 5.36% | |
| ๐ฆ | 5 | 4.46% | |
| ๐ฏ | 1 | 0.893% | |
| ๐ฅ | 1 | 0.893% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.893% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2026 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ โ get true โove from: โ โ โ milfoam rose, berrie mousse, petal jam, โ โ angelic pink, dollhouse tint, strawberry sugar โ โ โ โ โ
โค1๐1๐ 1๐1๐1๐1๐ฆ1
โ โ Happy Valentine's Day, Mis Amores! โ โ โ ๊ฐเฆ ๐ฆ๐พ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ and ๐น๐ฒ๐ท๐ด๐ท๐ฎ๐ผ๐ผ โ โ โ looks pretty on ๐ฐs . เป๊ฑ โ โ โ เญจเญงโ โโโโ โ โโโโ เญจเญง โ
โค2๐2โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐ 1๐1๐ฅ1๐ฆ1
Sticker, posted without a caption
โฅ๏ธ โOSรRIETY GRANDILOQUENCE OF CELESTIAL AUGURY โ INEFFABLE CONVERGENCE OF JUBILANCE & REVERENCE A DIURNAL PASSAGE OF ROSE-TINTED SERENDIPITY.
๐6๐4๐4๐ฆ2
ใ ค These lighthearted paragraphs were equanimous punctiliously by clichรฉ within a heartwarming charity, forasmuch the foretold chapter absolutely arrived and was mimeograped newly this candlelight. Before the belle epoque established we had foreshadowing everything beauteously threshold with choosing a dollish savoriness that was sugarcoated balmines of vanilla and pristine rโฆ
โค8โคโ๐ฅ5๐5๐ฏ1๐1๐1
ใ ค helloour, number ones! the countdown is officially on, and our response window for rosie's birthday is ALREADY CLOSED. to those who are coming, get ready for the best jubilee ever! ๐ชฝ๐ฉท ใ ค
โค3
Sticker, posted without a caption
#Chapter29WithROSร <3
๐2๐2๐1๐ 1๐ฆ1
A Dreamy Phantasm Unfolds In Shades of Clawsiรฉ, Wherefore Balminess Alive. โโโโโโโโโโโ โผ (On the 11th, Clawsiรฉ Machinery.) Longing takes sillhouettes through a arcade catcher holding a devoted laurels. In This Blooming Sphere, Roseate Becomes More Than A Hue; Itโs Warmth, Delight, Amid Spark of Occasion. ห เฃช
โค2๐2๐ 1๐1๐1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ใ ค ใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คstatue ver ใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ ค <or> red light ver . . ๐ต ใ ค 2026. 02. 27. 12AM(EST) / 2PM(KST)ใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ ค ใ ค
โค2๐2๐2๐2๐ 1๐1
ใ ค ใ คใ คใ คใ คใ ค เญง ๏น๏น made of magic เป๊ฑใ ค ใ ค ใ ค ๐ช f course angels are real , we exist . ใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ คใ ค [ DEADLINE ] ใ ค
๐3๐2๐ 2๐2โค1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @roseriety. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 503,225 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โโOSรโ๐ณ๐ช๐ฆ๐ต๐บ.. โกโ (@roseriety), 9 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roseriety.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.