Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Waves

@ror_c

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,992subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001817901834
TypeChannel
Username@ror_c
Descriptionوَهذا الكاتِبُ نَزَّاعٌ إلىٰ الجمال، طمّاحُ إلى الفَضيلة، مولَعٌ بكلِّ خلق كريم وقلبه فيّاضٌ بالإيمانِ والطُهر
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ror_c

Growth

14,96614,99214,9797 August 2026 — 14,966 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,966 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,970 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,986 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,991 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,992 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,962–14,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:4514,992+1
11 Aug 2026, 07:5114,991+5
10 Aug 2026, 05:2814,986+16
8 Aug 2026, 05:2814,970+4
7 Aug 2026, 08:4514,966no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:3314,966first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 14,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,970
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.838%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held23 (17 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total91,220
Reactions total764
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
954
Videos
111
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

764 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51667.5%
💘14218.6%
❤‍🔥729.42%
🕊293.80%
50.654%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 764reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ror_c. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 23:58 UTC≈1,230 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ليكن طريقُ الفضيلة دليلك, وإن بدا شاقًّا. فما من مجدٍ يدوم إلا ما شيَّدته الفضيلة. __ فيليس ويتلي : شاعرة أمريكية — من رسالتها إلى القس سامسون أوكوم, 1774.

10❤‍🔥3💘31🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC≈1,670 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وحدها الأحاسيس المرهفة بالأشياء الدقيقة هي ما يشغل بالي بعمق. هذه الأمور تلفت انتباهي لانشغالي بما هو هامشي. ربما لتعلقي بالتفاصيل. وعلى كل حال أعتقد لست متأكدًا من ذلك، لم يسبق لي أن حللت هذه الأمور قط- إن السبب يعود إلى أن الشيء الدقيق، الذي يفتقر إلى أي أهمية اجتماعية أو عملية يتمتع بسبب هذا الافتقار بالضبط، باستقلالية مطلقة عن الارتباطات المبتذلة للواقع. فرناندو بيسوا

14❤‍🔥11

10 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC≈1,690 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

إن كُنّا لا نرى الملائكةَ فإنه ليُخيَّلُ إلينا أننا نراها فيمَن نُحِبُّهم.. [القلب المسكين (٤) || وحي القلم]

15🕊6💘3❤‍🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC≈2,880 views34 reactions5 Starsread 13 August 2026

«استيقظتُ باكرًا، واستغرقتُ وقتًا طويلًا لأستعدّ للحياة.» -فرناندو بيسوا.

26💘6🕊2

7 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC≈2,800 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026

قال أديب: «أتدرين؟ طيفك يساكنني في صحوتي وغفوتي، وما انفككتُ أستحضرُك كلما استيقظ الفكر في صدري. أتمثلك تخطين الى جواري، تعبرين أثير أحلامي، وتتجوّلين بين نبضاتي في أحب أزقة قلبي الى نفسي. تطوفين في دروب الغابة التي لم تجمعنا مساراتها قط، يا فراشة حلقت خارج أبعاد الزمان..»

15❤‍🔥1🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC≈2,610 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

سُكوتي بَلاءٌ لا أطيقُ احتِمالَهُ وقلبي أَلوفٌ لِلهوى غَيرُ نازِعِ فأُقسِمُ ما تَركي عِتابَك عَن قِلًى ولكِن لِعِلمي أنّهُ غيرُ نافِعِ! وأنّي إذا لم ألزم الصبرَ طائعًا فلا بدّ منهُ مُكرَهًا غيرَ طائعِ ولو كان ما يُرضيك عندي مُمَثّلًا لكُنتُ لِما يُرضيك أوّلَ تابِعِ إِذا أنت لَم يعطِفْك إلّا شَفاعةٌ فلا خيرَ في وُدٍّ يكون بِشافِعِ _العباس بن الأحنف

9💘31🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 23:58 UTC≈2,350 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026

غَريزة العقل أُنثى، وما يستفاد من العلم ذَكَرٌ، ولن يصلحا إلا معاً. عيون الأخبار

17💘52

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,860 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وكيفَ انتفاعي بأنِّي كتمتُ بنطقِ الغرامِ عن العاذلِ؟! ولي ألسُنٌ شاهداتٌ به من الدَّمعِ والجسدِ النَّاحِلِ. ولولا الهوى قاهرٌ للرِّجالِ ما لِيمَ في النَّاسِ من عاقلِ! -الشريف المرتضى.

14💘4❤‍🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC≈2,690 views20 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وإنِّي لأقلى بذلَ غيرِك فاعلمي وبخلك في صدري ألذُّ وأطيبُ. -بهاء الدِّين زُهير.

12💘7❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 00:54 UTC≈2,870 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @soul_szlove

أحيانًا أجلس وحدي تحت النجوم، مفكّرًا بكلّ المجرات التي تسكن قلبي، متسائلاً ما إذا كان سيأتي يوم يحاول فيه أحدهم فهم كلّ ما أكونه. ‏ كريستوفر بويندكستر

30💘13❤‍🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC≈4,490 views34 reactionsread 13 August 2026

قال الغطمّش الضبي: إلى الله أشكو، لا إلى الناس أنني أرى الأرضَ تبقى والأخِلّاءُ تذهبُ أخِلّايَ لو غيرُ الحِمامِ أصابكم عَتَبتُ، ولكن ما على الدهر مَعتَبُ

30❤‍🔥2💘2

30 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈4,100 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026

وَمِثلِيَ لا يَأسى عَلى ما يَفوتُهُ إِذا كانَ عُقبى ما يَنالُ زَوالُ الشريف الرضي

25🕊5❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @ror_c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,566 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مكتبة المليون كتاب
@lovekotob · 495,879
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
حُبًّا للقراءة
@freebooksf · 204,855
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Waves” (@ror_c), 14,992 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ror_c.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.