Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for رقيات مفرغة حازم غريب

Channel

رقيات مفرغة حازم غريب

@roqiahazem

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,671subscribers

+88 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001657692653
TypeChannel
Username@roqiahazem
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 October 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/roqiahazem

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,5786,6716,624.54 October 2026 — 6,583 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,583 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6,585 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,591 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,586 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,584 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,578 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,586 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,585 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,659 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,671 subscribers4 October 20264 November 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net +88. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,564–6,685 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 08:456,671+12
1 Nov 2026, 06:016,659+74
29 Oct 2026, 00:286,585-1
25 Oct 2026, 19:306,586+8
22 Oct 2026, 20:206,578-6
19 Oct 2026, 08:106,584-2
16 Oct 2026, 14:206,586-5
13 Oct 2026, 21:476,591+6
8 Oct 2026, 15:586,585+2
4 Oct 2026, 19:226,583no change
4 Oct 2026, 18:476,583first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 23 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.10%
avg views ÷ 6,671 subscribers
Avg views / post
607
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held22 (23 September 2024 – 3 November 2026)
Views total1,214
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,063 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤66862.8%
👍35733.6%
🕊252.35%
👏80.753%
👎30.282%
😁20.188%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,063 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2024 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC609 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤17👍7🕊1

3 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC605 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( رقية الأقدام )

❤12👍4🕊2

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈4,380 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤25🕊4

12 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC≈4,360 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026

الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( رقية ابطال سحر الاب )

❤12👍7🕊3

23 Jun 2026, 11:24 UTC≈6,860 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026

من رقيات ذي الحجه 🕋 الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( رقية التعطيل )

❤18🕊2

10 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTC≈7,790 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤27👍13

10 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTC≈7,590 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026

الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( لابطال السحر الناري)

❤20

16 May 2026, 22:05 UTC≈9,080 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍24❤8🕊4👏1

16 May 2026, 22:05 UTC≈8,760 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026

الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( السحر المشموم )

❤31👍11🕊4

21 Jan 2026, 21:04 UTC≈13,200 views65 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤43👍18🕊3👎1

21 Jan 2026, 21:04 UTC≈12,700 views58 reactionsread 6 November 2026

الرقية الشرعيه 👇 ( لفك كل مربوط ومحبوس)

❤36👍21🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @roqiahazem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

بدر الشهري 1 Mega Goal
@T_Badr_MegGoal_1_2 · 19,216
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“رقيات مفرغة حازم غريب” (@roqiahazem), 6,671 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roqiahazem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.