4 measurements spanning 11 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,950–2,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 10:54
2,952
-9
13 Aug 2026, 10:16
2,961
-5
7 Aug 2026, 05:30
2,966
-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:51
2,968
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 25 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
803 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
222
27.6%
❤
182
22.7%
👍
137
17.1%
❤🔥
99
12.3%
👏
72
8.97%
🤔
26
3.24%
🕊
24
2.99%
🎉
15
1.87%
custom 5449857802593901902
9
1.12%
👎
8
0.996%
😱
6
0.747%
🆒
2
0.249%
😢
1
0.125%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 803reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 14 we hold a reading for · 64%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rootsterled. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2025 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пока подписчики из поста выше радуются своей победе в конкурсе, мы призываем остальных не унывать, ведь на носу ещё один - с лампами и удобрениями 🤫
А мы тем временем анонсируем новые модели полюбившейся многим Luminova - версии на 98 и 26 сантиметров.
Первая, мощностью 75 ватт, создана для стандартных стеллажных конструкций на ситифермах и имеет возможность диммирования 🎛
Вторая закрывает потребности растений в б…
Хороший свет - одна из главных составляющих здоровья растений. Поэтому мы вместе с Анной Самцовой решили порадовать любителей комнатных растений и запустить совместный розыгрыш.
Что разыгрываем:
🥇 1 место - Rootster Luminova в полной комплектации.
🥈🥉 2–3 места - Rootster Luminova в комплектации на выбор (магнит, подвес, стойка или крепление на окно)
🏅🏅 4–5 места — Rootster Phytoboard 180×180 мм, 40 Вт.
Как участв…
Новинка в ассортименте 🆕
Некоторые из вас заметили, что мы сняли с производства досветы Add Light White и Red. Вместо этого вышла линейка Luminova, но только с базовым спектром.
Rootster RED - компактный красный досвет на базе всё той же Luminova, с излучением 660нм Deep Red. Используется как дополнительная лампа к основной фитолампе, чтобы расширить спектр и усилить красную составляющую света.
Компактный корпус, …
«Тяжела и неказиста жизнь народного тыквиста» 🎃
Именно так описывает своё состояние один из наших подписчиков - Александр Чусов. Человек с действительно большой буквы, так как занимается выращиванием гигантских тыкв и не редко попадает с ними в новостные сводки.
В 2024 году Александр установил рекорд России, вырастив тыкву весом 817 кг, а в 2025 году он побил собственный рекорд сразу двумя гигантами - 961 и 969 кг.…
Всем привет 🖖
В этот день, 9 мая 1945-го года, вышел приказ верховного главнокомандующего СССР #369, в котором было указано, что Великая Отечественная война победоносно завершена.
Вторая мировая втянула в конфликт 61 государство (более 80% населения земли), а боевые столкновения, помимо морских и океанских театров военных действий велись на территории 40 государств 💣
Наши предки отстаивали мир в крупнейшем военном…
Объявляем ликвидацию ламп на складе OZON 📦
Речь идёт о Phytoboard 18х18см, который идеально подходит для пропагаторов и гроубоксов от 40х40см. Приятный глазу свет не будет мешать и на открытых полках на кухне или подоконнике.
Интенсивность 600 µmol/m2/s / 26 000 лк на высоте 20 см (за счет формы свет под лампой идет более плотно). Высокий коэффициент полезного действия (3,2 мкмоль/Дж) экономит до 30% электроэнерги…
Rootster - это не просто освещение для растений. Это доверие. Его не видно вживую, но оно чувствуется в каждом цикле, в каждом спокойном дне, когда растения выглядят «как с картинки» 🍓
Спасибо вам за то, что в этом году вы были с нами. За выбор, за внимание к деталям, за желание делать всё правильно и без лишних слов🌿🌿
Цитируя известную фразу «Счастье можно найти даже в самые тёмные времена, если не забывать обраща…
Шёл второй месяц осени, мы выживали как могли 🍁
Согреть сердца фермеров и садоводов этой прохладной и ветреной осенью смогут только крутые подарки в нашем совместном розыгрыше 🥳
21.10 с помощью рандомайзера выберем трёх победителей, каждый из которых получит Luminova и Plagron Green Sensation 250 ml.
Для участия по классике необходимо быть подписанным на каналы Rootster и Growmama, прожать реакции на пяти последни…
☀️ Почему фитолампы нужны даже в солнечную погоду
Кажется логичным: «На улице ярко — дома и так достаточно света!» Но на деле в помещении растения чаще недобирают свет. Почему? 👇
1️⃣ Стекло и интерьер «съедают» свет
Стеклопакеты, рамы, шторы и угол падения лучей снижают поток на листьях. Днём за окном может быть ярко, а на подоконнике — уже «разбавленный» свет.
2️⃣ Не хватает интенсивности
Теневыносливым растениям…
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤49👍26🤔11👎6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @rootsterled. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 411,126 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rootster Фитолампы” (@rootsterled), 2,952 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rootsterled.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
