Channel
@rootsmex_notice
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
111subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001426371267 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rootsmex_notice |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rootsmex_notice |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 111 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 112 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 112 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
BREAKING NEWS by TheBlock__ BREAKING: Pantera Capital looks to raise $1 billion for new crypto fund V https://t.co/dC9uxglpvB — The Block (@TheBlock__) Apr 25, 2024 BREAKING: Pantera Capital looks to raise $1 billion for new crypto fund V https://t.co/dC9uxglpvB
BREAKING NEWS by TheBlock__ BREAKING: ViaBTC's 'epic sat' from fourth Bitcoin halving block sells for 33.3 BTC ($2.13 million) https://t.co/UwgQNQ52HE — The Block (@TheBlock__) Apr 25, 2024 BREAKING: ViaBTC's 'epic sat' from fourth Bitcoin halving block sells for 33.3 BTC ($2.13 million) https://t.co/UwgQNQ52HE
ki_young_ju Tweeted! Over the past 8 years in crypto, I've heard claims that crypto is nothing more than gambling. Now, with the rise of memecoins, more people are echoing this sentiment. I admit the crypto industry loves gambling, but our industry used to love building. https://t.co/unKFmWwpPT — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 25, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783477767616823650
ki_young_ju Tweeted! 한국은 암호화폐 거래량으로는 전세계 시장을 리드하고 있지만, 웹3 창업환경은 최악입니다. 마치 한국 증권 거래소에 다른 나라 주식들이 더 많이 상장되어있고 한국 개미들이 미국 증시 거래량을 리드하고 있는 것과 같습니다.규제 당국의 낮은 이해도, 혁신을 저해하는 보수적인 태도가 가장 큰… https://t.co/ItKpB1o2D3 https://t.co/nHD8Z1e6jf — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 25, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783334452187537710
ki_young_ju Tweeted! The US DOJ has arrested pioneers in #Bitcoin privacy technology.Privacy stands as a core value of Bitcoin. Mixing itself is not a crime. Even crypto exchanges use mixing to safeguard user privacy.It's like punishing the inventor of the knife instead of the one who uses it. https://t.co/S7qcqtqCJh — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 25, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/178329030282206446…
ki_young_ju Tweeted! @DylanLeClair_ It's like punishing the inventor of the knife instead of the one who uses it. — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 25, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783285373084520841
ki_young_ju Tweeted! @notsofast @SamouraiWallet @SamouraiDev Nooooo wtf this is not right — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 24, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783283369067102384
BREAKING NEWS by CoinDesk BREAKING: U.S. authorities have arrested two co-founders of crypto mixing service Samourai Wallet. @cheyenneligon @nikhileshde reporthttps://t.co/f6OYLLv4oG — CoinDesk (@CoinDesk) Apr 24, 2024
ki_young_ju Tweeted! @GaryGensler It seems many people disagree on this take. I'm not a security law expert. Correct me if I'm wrong. — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 24, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783125813707288688
ki_young_ju Tweeted! Just wanted to say that the world would be a better place if altcoins simply stated, 'Hey, I'm a crypto asset security and well-regulated.' They don't need to deceive, and we don't need to call them shitcoins in this case.Wen regulations? @GaryGensler — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 24, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783119848450768995
ki_young_ju Tweeted! If my assessment is correct, then:Crypto Tokens = SecuritiesICO = IPOCrypto Exchange = Stock ExchangeNo need to worry if tokens lack utility since they are securities.We just need appropriate regulations for each country and industry-wide self-regulation. — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 24, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783113097877807403
ki_young_ju Tweeted! Most crypto tokens function as securities like stocks. The industry should accept this and create rules for these new securities instead of denying their nature.Well-regulated crypto tokens wouldn't need utility; crypto would simply be another means of public funding. — Ki Young Ju (@ki_young_ju) Apr 24, 2024 https://twitter.com/ki_young_ju/status/1783109591984972130
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rootsmex_notice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔔Rootsmex_notice” (@rootsmex_notice), 111 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rootsmex_notice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.