Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اتاق۶۶

Channel

اتاق۶۶

@room6_6

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,941subscribers

+485 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002798144910
TypeChannel
Username@room6_6
Description🎒 در حروف ابجد «۶۶» به معنای «الله» است. ‌ ‌راه ارتباطی: @Room_66bot تبلیغات: https://t.me/roo_m66_ads ‌ اگه قصدت اتلاف وقته در خدمتیم. محتوای ارزشمندی نیست ولی خب بازم کپی نکن ‌
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/room6_6

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4567,9467,7016 August 2026 — 7,456 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,461 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,580 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,645 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,598 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,573 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,546 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,545 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,555 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,564 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,590 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,642 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,657 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,667 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,732 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,694 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,706 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,713 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,724 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,733 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,723 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,892 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,918 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,924 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,946 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,926 subscribers11 November 2026 — 7,941 subscribers7,9416 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net +485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,383–8,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 15:577,941+15
7 Nov 2026, 18:497,926-20
4 Nov 2026, 16:047,946+22
2 Nov 2026, 01:087,924+6
29 Oct 2026, 16:417,918+26
26 Oct 2026, 07:367,892+169
23 Oct 2026, 10:377,723-10
20 Oct 2026, 06:077,733+9
17 Oct 2026, 13:457,724+11
15 Oct 2026, 00:097,713+7
11 Oct 2026, 09:567,706+12
5 Oct 2026, 09:227,694-38
27 Sept 2026, 15:397,732+65
17 Sept 2026, 20:417,667+10
13 Sept 2026, 13:407,657+15
9 Sept 2026, 08:187,642+52
3 Sept 2026, 14:157,590+26
31 Aug 2026, 00:287,564+9
28 Aug 2026, 01:087,555+10
25 Aug 2026, 00:347,545first reading

Engagement

614 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 7,941 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
299 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
299
of 614 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 297 of 299 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held614 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total354,211
Reactions total26,215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,940
Videos
≈314
Links
≈777

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 06s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

60,620 reactions across 591 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣36,44660.1%
👍12,41120.5%
❤4,8938.07%
💔2,5994.29%
👾1,5202.51%
🔥1,1991.98%
⚡3790.625%
🤝2610.431%
🥰2340.386%
❤‍🔥1610.266%
🙏1340.221%
🌚1180.195%
😡850.14%
😁790.13%
😍240.04%
🆒160.026%
✍150.025%
🤗150.025%
🕊120.02%
🫡120.02%
2 further kinds70.012%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 611 of the 614 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 614 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 614 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @room6_6. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 614 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 299 posts held from the last 30 days (4.01%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 14:07 UTC1 views2 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

تیزرشم اینه مثکه

👍1👾1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC151 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026

‌ انیمیشن ساخت ایران و ایرانیه داستانشم درمورد اینه که یه گروه آمریکایی میخوان تا یه سنگ رو به نام سنگ فارسی از اعماق خلیج فارس رو به دست بیارن، برای این کار یه سری مکعب هایی رو درست میکنن که اونا یه اثری روی ذهن مردم داشته باشه که مردم رو تسخیر خودشون میکنن. اینجا چهار تا نوجوون به همراه معلم شون متوجه این ماجرا میشن و سعی میکنن با پهباداشون(بادبادک همشون) اونا رو نابود کنند و مردم رو نجات بدن تا سنگ فارسی به دست آ…

❤13

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC181 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

این چند روز تعریفشو زیاد شنیدم

⚡6👍2

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC211 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026

منم ندیدمش خواستم بپرسم چطوره

👾9👍1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:57 UTC211 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

بچه ها انیمیشن نبرد بادبادک‌ها رو دیدید؟

👾13❤1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC397 views60 reactionsread 12 November 2026

کون فامیل با کوچکترین پیشرفت:

🤣59👾1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC393 views48 reactionsread 12 November 2026

‌ https://t.me/room6_6/16550 اگه گرفتیش به زنداییت نگو یهو دیدی خدایی نکرده از شدت حسودیش پی اس تو ثانیه های اول منفجر شد

🤣47👾1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC418 views56 reactionsread 12 November 2026

یکی از آشناها اونجا کار می‌کنه اون دروغ نمیگه😂

🤣55👾1

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC433 views28 reactionsread 12 November 2026

ولی از لحاظ اینکه میدن مطمئنم.

🤣24👾4

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC449 views24 reactionsread 12 November 2026

پرو ۳۵۰ تومنه اسلیم ۲۰۰ حالا طولم بکشه مگه بده؟

👍22👾2

Signed عرفان

12 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC425 views27 reactionsread 12 November 2026

‌ عرفان نمیخوام نا امیدت کنم ولی من یه بار ۳۰۰ هزار تومن توی یه مسابقه ی شبکه ورزش برنده شدم بعد ۲ ماه بهم دادن ، اینکه ۳۵۰ میلیون پولشه احتمالا خیلی طول بکشه.😂

👍27

Signed عرفان

Showing the 12 most recent of 614 posts we hold for @room6_6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

ᴋᴏɴᴊᴇ ᴍᴇʏᴋʜᴀɴᴇʜ
@Mikhaneh_315 · 3,785
7 posts
مود پزشکی👨🏻‍⚕️🩺|🇮🇷🎒MedMood
@MedStuMood · 9,613
3 posts
نامَحرم‌آت🇮🇷
@namahramat · 15,603
3 posts
پشت ویترین
@nannahan · 1,568
3 posts
پڕۆدکشن || یٰس🦩
@prodackkshen · 5,893
3 posts
قال و مقال | میلاد نیک‌مرام🚩
@Ghalomaghal · 2,045
2 posts
🇮🇷هِرمِسوف👾
@hermesof · 1,677
2 posts
والا حضرت ایکس
@valahazratx · 4,220
2 posts
آسِدمیم🇵🇸
@ASedMim · 2,779
1 post
آقامصطفا
@AghaMostafa · 17,406
1 post
یادداشت‌های موزماهی
@BananafishNotes · 685
1 post
جیره خوران قهار
@JireKhoran · 3,381
1 post
ممدوفسکی
@MrExynus · 1,574
1 post
اسکواد ایران | Squad Iran
@Squad_iran · 144,506
1 post
حُجره‌ی‌خانومِ‌صِفر
@Zero_artiste · 115
1 post
آقای مجری
@aghaye_mojrii · 2,462
1 post
آقای سایه|مهدی دخانی
@aghaye_saye · 7,790
1 post
AmirHossein Nevesht
@amirhossein_nevesht · 4,355
1 post
عــیّار
@ayyarom · 2,590
1 post
بنر
@bnrparf · 2
1 post
دل خراباتی
@del_kharabati · 1,235
1 post
محمد مهدی فاطمی صدر
@fatemisadr_ir_pe · 5,884
1 post
خزعبلات یک دبیرستانی
@khozoabalat · 54
1 post
🇮🇷•ماجرای من | عباس•🇵🇸
@magarayeman · 3,733
1 post
موعوבـ #انا_على_العهد🎒🇱🇧🚩
@moouood · 93
1 post
توییتر فارسی
@officialpersiatwiter · 569,517
1 post
مزدور حکومت | Optik
@optik_051 · 1,180
1 post
رادیات
@radiiat · 3,230
1 post
سایه خورشید|علی‌الاصول🚩
@saye_khorshid · 351
1 post
شهاب پارسا
@shahab_twt · 9,609
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اتاق۶۶” (@room6_6), 7,941 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/room6_6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.