عدسة سناب شات لذكرى استشهاد الامام الحسن العسكري عليه السلام . . رابط العدسة 👇👇👇 https://www.snapchat.com/unlock/?type=SNAPCODE&uuid=1a613bb414854373b43586d4d2588a6c&metadata=01 . . #مخطوطة #حسين_مقيم #تصميم #روح_الهجير . . #نسألكم_الدعاء

Channel
•• روح الهجير ••
@roohalhajeer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,851subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001087942597 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roohalhajeer |
| Description | ♡ رافقوا الله في حياتكم حتى لا تكونوا غرباء عند رحيلكم إليه ♡ تصاميمي حلالكم في نشرها او الكتابة عليها ماعدا الشعارات خاصه بأصحابها |
| Created | 2 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roohalhajeer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 8,851 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 8,850 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,845 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 8,842 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 8,846 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 8,843 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 8,843 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.02%
- avg views ÷ 8,851 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 710
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.213%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (20 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 29,100 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,590
- Videos
- ≈468
- Links
- ≈532
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 62.5% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
. . اِمفَـصِّـله اِعليك المآسي و الحزِن ثوبـك اِهْـدَعِش كوكب غابْوا لحد ما وصل نُوبك مات يا يوسف الزهره اللّيله يعگوبـك الثار مَـدْري اليُـطْـلِـبَـك لو هوَّه مطلوبك يمتَّه يسولف بيدك الصارِم و إنته البقيَّه من بني هاشِـم و اتصيح يسْيوف اِثْـأرِي اِبْموت الإمام العسكري إنته الـمُعزَّا . . ياحسن بن علي ايها #الزكي #العسكري يابن #رسول_الله يا #حجة_الله على خلقه يا سيدنا ومولانا ان توجهنا واستشفعنا وتوسلنا بك الى الل…
File, posted without a caption
سيطولُ بعدي يا سكينة فاعلمي مـنـك البـكاء إذ الحـمـام دهـاني لا تحرقـي قلبي بدمعـك حـسـرة ما دام مـني الروح في جـثمـانـي فـإذا قـتـلـتُ فأنـت أولـى بــالـذي تــبـكــيـنــه يـا خـيـرة الـنـســوان السلام عليكِ يابنت الاطهار وحبيبة قلب الحسين العطشان وعزيزة ابي الفضل الحيران عليكم مني سلام الله ابدا مابقيت وبقي الليل والنهار .. عظم الله اجورنا واجوركم بذكرى استشهاد #السيدة_سكينة عليها السلام .. #تصميم #روح_الهجير @r…
❤3
عدسة سناب شات لذكرى استشهاد #السيدة_الزهراء عليها السلام مع الضغط على الشاشه يتغير شكل العدسة رابط العدسة 👇👇👇 https://www.snapchat.com/unlock/?type=SNAPCODE&uuid=b2a0671dab86402c88f3d622d5658632&metadata=01
File, posted without a caption
قيل له : إنَّ في الدارِ #فاطمة … فقال : بقلبٍ لا يعرفُ للرحم حرمة : وإن ؟ كأنّ اسم #الزهراء لا يُهزُّ له جفن ولا يُذكِّرُه أن خلف الباب روحًا طاهرة سيدةً كان جبرائيل يقوم لها وكان النبيُّ ينهض إذا دخلت حياءً وهيبةً . وإن؟ كلمةٌ واحدة … لكن وقعها طعنة أطفأت نور دارٍ كانت السماءُ تستحي من أبوابها واهتزّت لها الملائكة وناحت لها الأرواح قبل الجدران . يا ويحَ قلبٍ قيل له : إنّ في الدار فاطمة … فلم يلن ، ولم يرتعد ، ولم…
💔1😢1
File, posted without a caption
شكراً سيدي يا أبا عبدالله .. الحمد لله الذي شرّفني بأن أقضي شهرين في رحابك يا مولاي .. في خدمتك وفي سكب الدموع على مصابك الجلل .. شهران كانا زاداً للروح وبلسماً للقلب ونافذةً إلى الرحمة الإلهية ما بين محراب العزاء ومجالس النور حيث تعلّمت كيف تكون التضحية والوفاء والإخلاص لله .. شكراً سيدي يا حسين يا من وهبتنا حياةً بمعنى آخر وذكراً لا ينطفئ ونوراً لا يخبو .. شهران في رحابك يا حسين كانت شرفاً لا يُقاس ونعمةً لا تُ…
❤4
File, posted without a caption
تبَّاً لهُمْ ! بِحالِها ما رفِقوا فقلْبُها كبابِها ( محترقُ) هلْ مُصْحفاً أمْ رئةً قدْ مَزَقُوا إذْ باغتَ المسمارُ صدْرَ العالِمَهْ ذي عِلَّةُ الإيجادِ أمُّ العترةِ آهٍ هوتْ طريحةً في علَّةِ (يُغْشى عليها) منْ عظيمِ المحنةِ حتَّى قضتْ ، وما رأَوْها باسِمَهْ.. كلمات الشاعر #علي_عسيلي_العاملي #عظم_الله_أجوركم #يازهراء #مخطوطة #حسين_مقيم @muqeem_art #تصميم #روح_الهجير @rooh.alhajeer
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @roohalhajeer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 108,485 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@imamhussain_ar · 153,929
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@ImamAliNet · 85,760
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
@alkafeel_global_network · 107,567
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•• روح الهجير ••” (@roohalhajeer), 8,851 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roohalhajeer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.