Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤㅤ``

Channel

ㅤㅤ``

@roninirlest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002177484008
TypeChannel
Username@roninirlest
Created23 August 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/roninirlest

Growth

1101121118 August 2026 — 111 subscribers9 August 2026 — 111 subscribers16 August 2026 — 112 subscribers24 August 2026 — 110 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 09:38110-2
16 Aug 2026, 04:07112+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:01111no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:32111first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 23 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.7%
avg views ÷ 110 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.3
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
32.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held15 (23 August 20247 August 2026)
Views total157
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

960 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 541829356824458012222223.1%
custom 520878397262400984516617.3%
custom 542500162855609718213614.2%
custom 542268083009280487011912.4%
custom 5208688688774546444868.96%
custom 5206591666697306436858.85%
custom 5206340668808528018798.23%
custom 5206636312882350789676.98%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 960reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2024 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
102
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roninirlest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 August 2024 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC38 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

😀😀

custom 54226808300928048705custom 54250016285560971824custom 52087839726240098452

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC40 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54226808300928048704custom 52087839726240098452

7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC41 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤ😀😀ㅤㅤ𝓞pinionㅤㅤ 🥹ㅤㅤ about mৎ 😀😀😀 Флуд удаляю

custom 54250016285560971829custom 54182935682445801226custom 52087839726240098455custom 54226808300928048705custom 52063406688085280182custom 52065916666973064361

7 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52087839726240098453custom 54226808300928048703

24 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC156 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤㅤ Any prns 🥹 ENFP 7w6 🥹 DNI BASE ㅤㅤㅤ

custom 52087839726240098458custom 54226808300928048707custom 54182935682445801225custom 54250016285560971825custom 52063406688085280184custom 52065916666973064364

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,660 views65 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541829356824458012222custom 542500162855609718217custom 520634066880852801815custom 520878397262400984511

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,680 views69 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541829356824458012220custom 520878397262400984515custom 542500162855609718213custom 520634066880852801811custom 542268083009280487010

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,660 views256 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 541829356824458012260custom 520868868877454644446custom 520659166669730643643custom 520634066880852801838custom 520878397262400984535custom 542268083009280487034

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,550 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541829356824458012218custom 542268083009280487012custom 542500162855609718211custom 52087839726240098455

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,560 views59 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 541829356824458012225custom 520663631288235078917custom 542500162855609718217

21 Feb 2026, 06:39 UTC≈1,550 views298 reactions102 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ. 🤍wixell 🤍adƦigal ㅤ🥹ㅤ i͟͟r͟͟l͟͟ 🦓eke's gf

custom 541829356824458012266custom 520878397262400984556custom 542500162855609718251custom 520663631288235078932custom 542268083009280487032custom 520659166669730643631custom 520868868877454644430

21 Feb 2026, 06:17 UTC≈1,380 views30 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 520878397262400984511custom 520868868877454644410custom 54250016285560971829

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @roninirlest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,182,448 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤㅤ``” (@roninirlest), 110 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roninirlest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.