8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,267–2,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 02:52
2,270
-3
23 Aug 2026, 05:25
2,273
-7
19 Aug 2026, 20:22
2,280
-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:13
2,281
-1
13 Aug 2026, 09:35
2,282
-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:17
2,283
-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
2,289
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:53
2,289
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.82%
avg views ÷ 2,270 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,280
Reactions total
119
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
119 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
30.3%
👍
33
27.7%
👏
25
21.0%
👌
11
9.24%
💯
4
3.36%
🏆
3
2.52%
🙏
3
2.52%
❤🔥
2
1.68%
⚡
1
0.84%
😍
1
0.84%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 20 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romantyrsin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Самая тревожная минута тренинга — когда в зале становится тихо...
Не тогда, когда спорят.
Не тогда, когда задают неудобные вопросы.
А когда ты предлагаешь участникам отработать продажи — и вся команда внезапно начинает внимательно изучать свои блокноты 😄
На одном из тренингов для салона красоты я спросил мастеров:
— Кто регулярно рекомендует клиентам домашний уход?
Тишина.
— Кто предлагает дополнительную услуг…
💸 ПОЧЕМУ ПОЛНЫЙ САЛОН НЕ ГАРАНТИРУЕТ ВЫСОКУЮ ПРИБЫЛЬ?
«У нас запись на неделю вперёд. Значит, всё хорошо.»
Это одна из самых опасных иллюзий руководителя.
Недавно на диагностике программы «Системный салон» владелица сказала именно эту фразу.
Когда начали разбирать цифры, выяснилось:
📉 Средний чек почти не растёт.
📉 Домашний уход покупают менее 12% клиентов.
📉 Повторная запись оформляется только в 18% случаев.
…
ОСВОБОДИЛОСЬ ОКНО. ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ В СЛЕДУЮЩИЕ 10 МИНУТ — ПО ШАГАМ.
Вчера показал салон, где пустые слоты просто умирали.
Сегодня — готовая процедура. Внедряется сегодня же, стоит ноль рублей.
ШАГ 1. ВЕДИТЕ «ЛИСТ ОЖИДАНИЯ» (5 МИНУТ В ДЕНЬ)
Каждый раз, когда клиент говорит «а раньше нельзя?» или «жаль, неудобное время» — админ фиксирует: имя, услуга, желаемое время. Это ваш резерв на случай отмены.
ШАГ 2. ОСВОБОДИЛОСЬ…
"ПРОСТО ЛЕТО, ВСЕ В ОТПУСКАХ". РАЗБИРАЕМ САЛОН, ГДЕ ДЕЛО БЫЛО НЕ В ЛЕТЕ.
Вчера просил посчитать загрузку и ОПЗ. В салоне из Перми цифры на старте были такие:
— заполняемость: 41–43%
— клиентов у мастера: 32–37 в месяц
— возвратность: 25–27% — ОПЗ: 15%
Владелец Анна объясняла привычно: сезон, город, конкуренты демпингуют.
Мы посмотрели, что происходит на самом деле:
1. Топ-мастеров подняли по просьбе, а не по пок…
ПУСТОЕ КРЕСЛО СТОИТ ВАМ ДЕНЕГ КАЖДЫЙ ЧАС. СЧИТАЕМ, СКОЛЬКО ИМЕННО.
Две недели мы считали клиентов: сколько теряем (возвратность) и сколько недобираем с пришедших (чек).
Сегодня — третья цифра. Она про то, что происходит, когда клиента нет вообще.
Смотреть надо не одну цифру, а две.
ЗАГРУЗКА (ЗАПОЛНЯЕМОСТЬ)
Загрузка = отработанные часы ÷ доступные часы × 100%.
Сколько из оплаченного вами рабочего времени мастера…
НЕДЕЛЯ, В КОТОРОЙ МЫ СЧИТАЛИ, СКОЛЬКО ВЫ НЕДОБИРАЕТЕ С КАЖДОГО КЛИЕНТА.
Если пропустили — вот вся неделя:
Пн. Средний чек и три цифры, на которые его надо разложить. Разрыв между мастерами — ваш незабранный доход 👉 https://t.me/romantyrsin/1950
Вт. Кейс: разрыв 42% между мастерами и 5 фраз, которые его создавали. Чек +17% 👉 https://t.me/romantyrsin/1954
Ср. Матрица допродаж: что к чему предлагать, с фразами 👉 htt…
ЧТО МЫ РАЗОБРАЛИ НА ЭТОЙ НЕДЕЛЕ В ЗАКРЫТОМ КЛУБЕ.
Не теорию.
Инструменты, которые внедряются в понедельник.
▪️ Стандарт повторной записи: четыре шага вместо «вас записать на следующий раз?»
▪️ Три ответа на «я потом напишу»
▪️ Разбор базы на пять сегментов: кому писать сегодня, а кого не трогать вообще
▪️ Воронка возврата из пяти этапов и расчёт, сколько стоит в год ваш слабый переход
▪️ Четыре причины, почему мас…
5 ДИАГНОСТИК ЗА НЕДЕЛЮ. И НИ В ОДНОМ САЛОНЕ ГЛАВНАЯ ПРОБЛЕМА НЕ В РЕКЛАМЕ.
Два салона в Москве, Санкт-Петербург, Пермь и Собинка.
Названия не раскрываю. Финансовые показатели округлены.
Вот что показали цифры.
📍 САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГ
Красивое премиальное пространство с сильным личным брендом владельца.
Но около 75% выручки создаёт сам собственник.
Целевая выручка уже достигалась — а владельческой прибыли всё равно н…
🚨 ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ С СОТРУДНИКАМИ, КОТОРЫЕ НЕ ХОТЯТ ПРОДАВАТЬ И ЗАПИСЫВАТЬ КЛИЕНТОВ ПОВТОРНО?
Сначала перестать говорить команде:
❌ «Вам нужно активнее продавать».
❌ «Предлагайте клиентам дополнительные услуги».
❌ «Не забывайте записывать на следующий визит».
Это не задачи.
Это пожелания, которые невозможно нормально выполнить и проконтролировать.
Чаще всего сотрудник не продаёт по одной из четырёх причин:
1️⃣ Не зна…
Записать клиентку на ту же процедуру через месяц0%
Предложить более интенсивную процедуру в следующий раз0%
Продать самый питательный крем из ассортимента0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romantyrsin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Клиентка во время окрашивания говорит:
«Через неделю улетаю в отпуск. Там солнце, море — боюсь, цвет быстро смоется».
Обновить цвет сразу после возвращения11%
Защитный уход от солнца и соли + объяснить схему применения78%
Питательную маску для восстановления волос11%
Подстричь концы, чтобы волосы выглядели аккуратнее0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Роман Тырсин” (@romantyrsin), 2,270 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romantyrsin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.