Posted without readable text

Channel
Начитанная, плохо воспитанная🔞
@romans_story
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002147827877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @romans_story |
| Description | Комфортный канал о книгах💗 Тут будет👇🏻 •Мои книги •Популярные из ТикТок •Классика •Авторские стихи и мысли •Эстетика |
| Created | Between 1 April 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/romans_story |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 218
- Videos
- 67
- Links
- 29
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| custom 5188268777866821868 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5208968969750330825 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5190486325316318143 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5107241054436852760 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5107585235936084791 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5190571099380807087 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5190892801021212281 | 2 | 7.14% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Пропадаю по причинам здоровья и учёбы, почти нет времени, но постараюсь дописать книгу и начать новую
С 8 марта😘 С праздником, мои дорогие читательницы и писательницы💻 Желаю много идей, развития, книг и много мужских интрижек из любимых книг🤩 Меня мой молодой человек уже поздравил с нашим праздником (да представляете? У меня теперь своя любовь, уже месяц с лишним🤏🏻) С праздником мои дорогие и любимые, я вернусь, клянусь💋
Надеюсь, что все таки допишу эту книгу и возьмусь за новую🤞🏻
Всем зимнего привета! ❤️ Я наконец зашла на свой ваттпад и увидела это😍 Спасибо за продвижение книги, которая временно при остановилась. Да, я хотела закончить эту книгу до Нового года, но не вышло. Я стала очень ленивой, как войти в свой прайм я в душе не знаю, как это вообще сделать не знаю. Да, виновата, что даже посты каждый 1 день месяца не выкладывала. Потому что я уже не знала, что писать и чисто физически р…
С Новым годом!
💘1
Всех с наступающим Новым годом! 🥳 Столько хочется сказать, но не думаю, что нужны огромные текста в благодарность людям, которые были со мной и продолжают быть лучшими в моей жизни. Были и слезы с истерикой, был смех, ностальгия по своей Родине и много другое. Приходили и уходили люди из моей жизни, чему я рада, что большинство ушли и надеюсь не вернуться и я не стану делать шаг к ним. Хочу ещё сказать огромное сп…
💘2
Подписку на начинающего писателя☺️
Всё-таки хорошо,когда есть человек,с которым можно обсудить книгу,сюжет,высказать ему свои чувства. В моей жизни этим человеком является @devvfu ,самый прекрасный и любимый человек,с которым можно поболтать. С ней можно посмеяться буквально со всего. Посплетничать на какие-то темы и знать,что она не осудит тебя и будет рядом всегда. @llnykso обожаю. @vikkuyqs дурочка,с которой прожили большую часть вместе,хоть и сс…
Всем доброго времени🤚 Хочу немного поделиться тем, что сейчас со мной и почему ВООБЩЕ нет от меня актива, сообщений и тп. В данный период мне очень тяжело в плане совмещения, но с тем, что я освободила время и теперь я точно буду активна вероятность выше 100🥹. Но, у меня не загружается ваттпад, посоветуйте пожалуйста впн🥺 Приятного чтения и учебного процесса❤️
custom 51904863253163181432custom 51882687778668218681custom 51905710993808070871custom 51908928010212122811
Чья? #эстетика #герои
custom 51882687778668218681
🖤Ассоциация для - Милана •Канал: Начитанная, плохо воспитанная🔞 🫦Героиня: Полин 🎰Книга: "Будь моим" "Безумный… какой безумный вечер! Вот бы пережить его, не наломав дров." Лично моё мнение Спасибо за участие❤️ #ассоцации
💘1custom 51882687778668218681custom 51904863253163181431custom 51905710993808070871custom 51908928010212122811
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @romans_story. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотим мою оценку приложений для публикации книг? И какие я советую? (Опыт есть)
- Даааа давай67%
- Нет, спасибо0%
- Кнопка автора!!!33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 10 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,285,142 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@romans_story named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Начитанная, плохо воспитанная🔞” (@romans_story), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romans_story.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.