Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Джавист Роман ☕️

@romankh3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,611subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001251643708
TypeChannel
Username@romankh3
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/romankh3

Growth

1,6111,6151,6137 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,611 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,610–1,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:021,611-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:161,615no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:351,615first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.1%
avg views ÷ 1,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
614
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 June 20255 August 2026)
Views total1,841
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

598 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁17529.3%
👍11619.4%
10617.7%
🔥9015.1%
👏447.36%
💯203.34%
👎172.84%
😱81.34%
61.00%
😐50.836%
🙏40.669%
🤩30.502%
🥱20.334%
😍10.167%
🤔10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 598reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @romankh3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC417 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А как вы готовитесь к длительным поездкам за рулем? 😁😁

🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC776 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Практически это значит: смена инструмента стоит переписывания тонкой обёртки, а не переноса всей методологии. Отвалится доступ, выйдет что-то лучше, работа потребует другого стека — база останется. Толстый скилл в такой момент придётся разбирать вручную, вспоминая, что там накопилось за полгода. Та же логика работает в команде. Правила и промпты, лежащие в репозитории рядом с кодом, а не в личных настройках каждого,

8👏2

1 Aug 2026, 09:51 UTC648 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Obsidian + Claude: Принцип тонких скиллов: контекст-оунером остаётся vault. —- Всем привет! Последние полгода года я погружаюсь со скафандром в мир Obsidian, а также в мир AI-агентов, от этого есть мысли, которые хотелось бы закрепить. Поэтому следующие серии заметок буду выносить мысли обо всем этом. —- Сегодня хочу поговорить над тем, какие лучше использовать скилы в клоде в контексте работы со своим личным храни

8👍3🥱1🙏1

12 May 2026, 08:56 UTC≈1,210 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Милости из прошлого open source. Придется сходить и зарелизить новую версию, раз уж пользуются люди 😁

😁22🔥15👍74👏1

31 Dec 2025, 18:26 UTC≈2,210 views49 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Отдал перплексити на аутсорс сгенерировать поздравление на основе моих текстов на канале. Вышло неплохо: С наступающим 2026 годом. Пусть в новом году всё, что действительно важно, наконец перестанет откладываться «на потом». Пусть задач меньше, чем ресурсов, а энергии больше, чем дедлайнов. Чтоб люди вокруг были как хороший код‑ревью: честные, внимательные и по делу. Желаю: • дохода, который растёт быстрее инфляци

32👏122😁2🔥1

12 Dec 2025, 14:05 UTC≈2,240 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот это пригорело у ребят, что даже сделали сайтик: https://neprivet.com 😂 В целом ноль осуждения, реально бесит

💯18😁4🔥1🥱1

11 Dec 2025, 11:59 UTC≈2,730 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хех 😈

😁63👍14🔥12💯2😍1

26 Nov 2025, 20:33 UTC≈2,360 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кстати, кому понравилась статья - человек таки решился открыть свой канал после реакции на его запись. Причем даже не забросил сразу, пишет в том же духе. Кому интересно - залетайте @thegodproduct)

👍8👏1🔥1

24 Nov 2025, 05:35 UTC≈2,240 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Начало выше 👆 ## Второй этап: найм бизнесовых и системных аналитиков Как только команда обоснована и согласована у руководства, а также PO и TL провели ревью бэклогов и роадмапа, тогда можно начинать смотреть в сторону того, чтобы формировать уже более приземленные данные по необходимым для реализации требований. Работа по каждому из анализов начинается сразу же, как только появится аналитик, так как нужно разбира

👏10👍631

24 Nov 2025, 05:35 UTC≈1,370 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как бы я собирал команду? Говорил о том, как бы правильно собрать команду и в голове начались набрасываться детали и идеи как бы можно было это сделать. Теперь хочу поделиться ими с вами. Дисклеймер: - Цель этой статьи описать процесс при котором можно было бы эффективно использовать необходимые ресурсы и не раздувать команду раньше времени, что особенно актуально сейчас. Особенно это актуально становится во время

👏631

22 Nov 2025, 09:10 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, всем привет! Есть к вам вопрос такой интересный, сегодня пока готовил новую статью для вас пришла в голову мысль о том, что было бы круто, если бы был у меня узкий круг людей, которые бы прочитывали статьи заранее (где-то в частном канале) и давали свои мысли, как можно было бы сделать ее лучше. Такая вот бета-версия статьи для тех, кому интересно высказать свое мнение, которое потом повлияет на статью. От

7

20 Nov 2025, 15:06 UTC≈1,770 views57 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Друзья, коллега написал свой пост по тому, какой сейчас рынок труда в ИТ. Назовем его «Бородатый Продакт». Если пост зайдет, то он откроет свой канал. Текст никак не редактировался. Осенний джоб-хантинг в IT, 2025. Записки с линии фронта. Для начала, важнейшая оговорка: весь этот бред, вся эта бурлящая субстанция из отчаяния и цинизма, что последует ниже, касается исключительно бизнес-вертикали — того самого мира,

27🔥20😐4🙏3👍1👏1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @romankh3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Джавист Роман ☕️” (@romankh3), 1,611 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/romankh3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.