23 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTCviews —
Posted without readable text
Channel
роли ркв
@roles_rkv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004317484291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roles_rkv |
| Created | 14 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roles_rkv |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 2 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 945.5%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18.9
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 5.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (14 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 208 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
23 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCviews —
Posted without readable text
14 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC18 viewsread 23 August 2026
Зᥲняᴛ᧐ — ❄️ Бρ᧐нь — 🪽 Ждᥱⲙ — 🕊
14 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC20 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫ дρуᴦᥙᥱ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Дᥲᥔнᥴ᧘ᥱᥔɸ — Иᴛ϶ρ — 𐌡юⲙᥙн — 𐌿ᥲᥔⲙ᧐н — 𑀝κᥙρκ — ❄️ А᧘ᥙᥴᥲ — 𐋏ᥙκ᧐᧘ь —
14 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC20 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫ɸᥲᴛуᥙ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Аρ᧘ᥱκᥙн᧐ — Д᧐ᴛᴛ᧐ρᥱ — 𐌺ᥲᥰᥙᴛᥲн᧐ — 𐌺᧐᧘уⲙδᥙнᥲ — 𐌿ᥲнᴛᥲ᧘᧐нᥱ — 𐌿у᧘ьчᥙннᥱ᧘ᥲ — 𐌿ьᥱρ᧐ — 𑀝ᥲндρ᧐нᥱ — 𑀝ᥙнь᧐ρᥲ — 𑀝κᥲρᥲⲙуччᥲ — ❄️ Тᥲρᴛᥲ᧘ья — Цᥲρᥙцᥲ-
14 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC19 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ᥴнᥱжнᥲя ۫ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Цᥲρᥙцᥲ — ❄️ Вᥱᥴнᥲ — А᧘ёɯᥲ — Дᥲнᥙκᥲ — В᧐дянᥙцᥲ — 𐋏᧐ᥔ — 𐌏дᥱᴛᴛᥲ — ❄️ 𐌑ᥙᴛя — Вᥲ᧘ᥱρᥙᥔ —
14 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC17 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫н᧐д κρᥲᥔ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Инᥱɸɸᥲ — 𐋏ᥱɸᥱρ — Яᴦ᧐дᥲ — Аᥔн᧐ — 𐌡ᥲуⲙᥲ — Рᥱρᥙ — Ф᧘ᥙнᥴ — 𐌡ᥙннея –
14 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC17 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ɸ᧐нᴛᥱᥔн ۫ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 𐌺᧘᧐ρᥙндᥲ — 𐌡ᥙнᥱᴛᴛ — 𐌡ᥙнᥙ — 𐋏ᥲʙᥙя — ❄️ 𐋏ᥱʙᥙ᧘᧘ᥱᴛ — Рᥙᤋ᧘ᥙ — 𑀝ᥙджʙᥙн — Фρᥱⲙᥙнᥱ — Фуρᥙнᥲ — Шᥲρ᧘᧐ᴛᴛᥲ — Шᥱʙρᥱᤋ — Эⲙᥙ᧘ᥙя — Эᥴκ᧐ɸьᥱ — ❄️
14 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC19 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫ нᥲᴛ᧘ᥲн ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 А᥊ᥲʙ — Вᥲρᥱᥴᥲ — Иᥲнᥴᥲн — Иɸᥲ — 𐌺ᥲчᥙнᥲ — 𐌺ᥙнᥙч — 𐌑ᥲʙуᥙκᥲ — 𐌑уᥲ᧘ᥲнᥙ — 𐌏ρ᧐ρ᧐н — 𑀝ᥙᴛ᧘ᥲ᧘ᥙ — Կᥲᥴκᥲ — Шᥙ᧘᧐нᥱн —
14 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC19 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫ᥴуⲙᥱρу ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 А᧘ь-𐌗ᥲᥔᴛᥲⲙ — Д᧐ρᥙ — Д϶᥊ья — 𐌺ᥲʙᥱ᥊ — 𐌺ᥲндᥲκᥙя — 𐌺᧐᧘᧘ᥱᥙ — 𐌡ᥲᥔ᧘ᥲ — 𐋏ᥲ᥊ᥙдᥲ — 𐋏ᥙ᧘у — 𑀝ᥲᥔн᧐ — 𑀝ᥱᴛ᧐ᥴ — Тᥙᴦнᥲρᥙ — Фᥲρуᤋᥲн —
14 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ۫ᥙнᥲдᤋуⲙᥲ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Аяκᥲ — Аяᴛ᧐ — 𐌲᧐ρ᧐ — Ёᥙⲙᥙя — Иᴛᴛ᧐ — 𐌺ᥲдᤋу᥊ᥲ — 𐌺ᥙρᥲρᥲ — 𐌺᧐κ᧐ⲙᥙ — 𐌑ᥙдᤋуκᥙ — 𑀝ᥲρᥲ — 𑀝ᥲю — Рᥲᥔдᥱн — 𑀝ᥙн᧐δу — Т᧐ⲙᥲ — Т᧐ⲙ᧐ — Тᥙ᧐ρᥙ — 𐌗ᥱᥔдᤋ᧐ — Я϶ 𐌑ᥙκ᧐ —
🕊1
14 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC20 viewsread 23 August 2026
𝅄 𝂅ׄ ꒰ঌ ᧘ᥙ юэ ۫ ໒꒱ ۫ 𝅄 Бᥲᥔ Կжу — Бᥱᥔ Д᧐у — 𐌲ᥲнь Юᥔ — Е 𐌡ᥲнь — ❄️ 𐌺ᥲ 𐌑ᥙн — 𐌺ᥱ Цᥙн — 𐌡ᥲнь Янь — 𐋏ᥙн 𐌲уᥲн — 𑀝ᥙн Цю — 𑀝ᥙнь Янь — 𑀝ян 𐌡ᥙн — 𑀝янь Юнь — 𑀝я᧐ — 𐌗у Тᥲ᧐ — ❄️ Цᥙ Цᥙ — Կжун 𐌡ᥙ — Կун Юнь — Шᥱнь 𐌗϶ — Юнь Цᤋынь — Янь Фᥱᥔ — Я᧐ Я᧐ —
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @roles_rkv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 976,123 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“роли ркв” (@roles_rkv), 2 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roles_rkv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.