Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Rolak

@rolak1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

125subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003192866268
TypeChannel
Username@rolak1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 18 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rolak1

Growth

1211251238 August 2026 — 121 subscribers8 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers15 August 2026 — 125 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 120–126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:48125+2
9 Aug 2026, 03:17123no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:33123+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:00121first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 18 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
193.5%
avg views ÷ 125 subscribers
Avg views / post
242
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held14 (18 October 20258 August 2026)
Views total1,451
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

602 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥26944.7%
23338.7%
🔥9215.3%
🤡40.664%
💩20.332%
🤓20.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC77 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026

я постараюсь сделать видео в тт для большего охвата, но хз залетит не залетит

15❤‍🔥2🤡2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC153 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сразу говорю, что я ПРОТИВ травли и публичного линчевания. В данном случае мы можем лишь постараться проинформировать как можно больше людей, потому что спрос рождает предложение. Однако по многим вещам в фандоме и отношению Н. Щербы уже видно, как сильно фандом погряз в ИИ и его нормализации, поэтому лично я не верю в то, что получится "исцелить" каждого подобного фаната сгенерированых картинок. Пронос понравившего

❤‍🔥1710🔥8💩1🤡1

8 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC164 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, хочу распространить информацию касательно пользователя dalexarttttttt и того, что данный человек НЕ ХУДОЖНИК и собрал аудиторию исключительно на ИИ работах. Мне жаль, что кому-то до сих пор приходится объяснять, почему ии - это не творчество и от его использования вы не становитесь художником. Что касательно тейков. Описание с пометкой "ИИ" в профиле появилась только после череды разоблачений, так что д

🔥17❤‍🔥118💩1🤡1

4 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC344 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А мы вообще-то делали коллаб с Корликс... откладывали дорисовку сто лет Нортон и Лисса молодые🌷

❤‍🔥2417🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC234 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

рандом рисунок моей ос Лилии🌷 случайно вышел рисунок с белой королевой 2.0. вообще этот перс не связан с Часодеями, но изначально был создан для ролки по ним...

25❤‍🔥12🔥9

18 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC479 views74 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет винегрет, перерисовка ии слопа от Щербы. а ещё тут теперь 100 человек🥺🥺🥺 но я боюсь пока праздновать

36❤‍🔥27🔥11

21 May 2026, 13:36 UTC395 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

random with diana мне почему-то нравится представлять, что Диана несмотря на то, что вроде как старше их всех, сама по себе довольно миниатюрна и не выглядит их старше. как бы такая тихая изысканная мудрость феи... хотя в итоге все книги она больше сидит с покерфейсом от тупости ребят🦉, а тут няшко

❤‍🔥2611🔥5

3 May 2026, 17:52 UTC394 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

случайно увидела у Натальи Щербы что сегодня у Захарры др... С днём рождения захарку🥺😍

36🔥11❤‍🔥9

28 Apr 2026, 12:11 UTC371 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

всем привет🤠 скоро будет невероятный коллаб с моей подругой по часодеям🤫🤫🤫🤫 а пока скетч на фэша не хватило бюджета (и моих знаний анатомии)

29❤‍🔥10🔥5

3 Apr 2026, 13:29 UTC571 views65 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

незапланированный рисунок🧚🏻‍♀️

❤‍🔥40🔥1411

6 Mar 2026, 13:57 UTC442 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, в тиктоке вышло новое видео https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8C9KoVY/ кадр из видео (Василиса описалась в штанишки)

❤‍🔥265🤓2🔥1

28 Feb 2026, 16:30 UTC414 views46 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

всем привет, я жива... хз какой вариант лучше. буду продолжать читать и что-то рисовать😵‍💫❤️‍🩹

❤‍🔥3014🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @rolak1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 566,482 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rolak” (@rolak1), 125 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rolak1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.