Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Roja S Rajan IFS

Channel

Roja S Rajan IFS

@rojasrajan108

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,118subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623856169
TypeChannel
Username@rojasrajan108
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rojasrajan108

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,1187,1637,140.526 August 2026 — 7,163 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,163 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,154 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,144 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,129 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,126 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,118 subscribers26 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,111–7,170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:397,118-8
11 Sept 2026, 06:197,126-3
6 Sept 2026, 15:597,129-15
2 Sept 2026, 14:097,144-10
30 Aug 2026, 09:467,154-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:157,163no change
26 Aug 2026, 20:017,163first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16146.4%
12435.7%
❤‍🔥216.05%
🙏144.03%
👏61.73%
🍌41.15%
🕊41.15%
😍30.865%
🤝30.865%
😇20.576%
😡20.576%
👌10.288%
👎10.288%
🤗10.288%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2024 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2025, 19:50 UTC≈9,420 views73 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, due to continuous posting of inappropriate content, I had to delete the discussion group. I wish you all the very best for your future endeavours. The discussion group was supposed to be for information exchange and positive peer engagement, unfortunately some are not respecting the decorum and purposefully posting such contents. It is increasingly difficult for me to keep checking if someone posts such co

55👍13👏5

18 Sept 2025, 04:20 UTC≈11,800 views34 reactionsread 26 August 2026

How to approach theories? 1. Pick one standard source - Upadhyay and Pandey + Columbia university is what I chose. 2. Read the detailed explanation of the topic. For eg, Classical evolutionism, read its history, how it evolved, etc like reading a story. For better understanding and recollection, I suggest reading twice or thrice. 3. Go through pyq from the topic - this gives you an idea for what to focus in note m

33👎1

14 Sept 2025, 17:42 UTC≈10,300 views24 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, For those asking where to start anthro and related queries. I would suggest, you can either do Socio-cultural anthro first and then do Biological Anthro. Now, if you are choosing to do the former, start with Theories. If you are choosing physical anthro, you may start from 9.1 (Paper 1) I would recommend finishing paper 1 and then going for paper 2

👍213

14 Sept 2025, 10:03 UTC≈10,600 views39 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, I created this community to support aspirants during my limited free time. However, it is disheartening to see some members misusing the discussion chat by posting inappropriate content. If this continues, I will have no choice but to shut down the group. This platform was intended to be an informative space where answers to common queries could benefit everyone. While these actions may come from only a f

👍31🙏52👏1

24 Aug 2025, 13:24 UTC≈11,900 views23 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, As per suggestions from the last session, if I am to start video lessons for Anthropology, what topic(s), would you suggest me to cover? Feel free to comment.

23

28 Jun 2025, 06:35 UTC≈18,500 views20 reactionsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, Here is the link for today's session: https://meet.google.com/ctg-epda-fbx See you at 1:30pm IST

👍16🍌4

26 Jun 2025, 10:59 UTC≈16,800 views4 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Poll

June 28, 1:30 PM IST, Session on Note Making

  1. Yes, Shall attend70%
  2. No, timing is not feasible22%
  3. Not interested8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2😡2

26 Jun 2025, 10:58 UTC≈15,300 viewsread 26 August 2026

Dear all, as per the votes, since most of you would like to have a session on note making, I would like to know if Saturday, 28 June, 1:30 pm is a feasible time for all of you to join the session. Apologies for the short notice, I can try and reschedule if majority votes NO. Please mark your reply in the poll below

17 Jun 2025, 08:46 UTC≈14,900 views5 reactionsread 26 August 2026

https://youtu.be/D28ldbp2WTU?si=RlvqDPWwt6Hffz1Q

👍5

16 Jun 2025, 09:26 UTC≈11,200 views12 reactionsread 26 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ibWAe0OEN_E?si=5HQ-k1vqF7z5QTAQ

👍12

16 Jun 2025, 07:05 UTCviews —

Roja S Rajan IFS pinned «Anthropology Paper 1 Booklist ------------------------------ 1.1-1.3 : Akshat Jain Book, Telugu Academy 1.4 : P Nath, Telugu Academy 1.5 : Telugu Academy 1.6 : Telugu Academy 1.7 : P Nath and Youtube Videos 1.8 : D K Bhattacharya video and book, Muniratnam…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rojasrajan108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jun 2025, 10:59 UTCAnonymous Poll433 voters

June 28, 1:30 PM IST, Session on Note Making

  1. Yes, Shall attend70%
  2. No, timing is not feasible22%
  3. Not interested8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jun 2025, 15:22 UTCAnonymous Poll604 voters

Do you need a session on how to use my notes in your preparation/ how to make notes from scratch?

  1. Yes92%
  2. No8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2024 to 10 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPSC Ethics Notes
@Ethics_Notes_UPSC · 33,862
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
DJ REMIX WORLD
@Latest_Dj_Songs · 25,087
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 14 September 2026
UPSC Prelims Test Series
@UpscPrelimsTestSeriesss · 46,955
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Roja S Rajan IFS” (@rojasrajan108), 7,118 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rojasrajan108.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.