Channel
@roit_xd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,830subscribers
+51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001539230463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @roit_xd |
| Description | хойо админ, ютьюп лорщик и другие стыдные прозвища Ютуп: youtube.com/@roit_xdd Мои тг-каналы: @genshin_lore, @gilore_faq, @fact_impact, @fact_zzz, @fact_honkaistarrail По вопросам @andreyroit |
| Created | 1 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/roit_xd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 9,830 | +20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:38 | 9,810 | +31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 9,779 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 9,779 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 194,040 |
| Reactions total | 22,270 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
22,270 reactions across 37 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368523530168180585 | 10,475 | 47.0% | |
| custom 5334810828623323928 | 3,432 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5292027864818917150 | 3,280 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5382329324584068996 | 2,544 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5453945950034730363 | 1,858 | 8.34% | |
| custom 5440450024624365453 | 681 | 3.06% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @roit_xd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 37 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Круто сделали навигацию по квестам, но тут ещё проходить и проходить... 🥹 Я уже очень устал, хотя по факту ничего толком и не успел кроме сюжетки, бегал карту открывал и ресурсы собирал для персонажей 💀
custom 5382329324584068996427custom 533481082862332392886custom 536852353016818058533
И как она вам? А ведь многим после первого трейлера показалось, что у неё скучный дизайн 🧜♀️
custom 5368523530168180585411custom 538232932458406899656custom 529202786481891715028
Хойо оказали нам услугу и уже сейчас показали геймплей Мити в общих чертах. Выглядит интересно 😶
custom 5368523530168180585489custom 545394595003473036371custom 529202786481891715046custom 53823293245840689965
Я прошел сюжетку, восемь часов ушло. Это абсолютный пик 😲
custom 5292027864818917150473custom 5334810828623323928110custom 536852353016818058577
Некая девушка. Говорят, следит за Путешественником ❓
custom 5368523530168180585509custom 529202786481891715077custom 538232932458406899626custom 533481082862332392818
Я только прибыл в Снежноград и обнаружил у экспозиции у Заполярного дворца сестру Линнеи Келено 🕊 ...А, это ты. Я выполняю поручение родителей: везу их любимую человеческую дочь в деревню на очередной сеанс лечения. Вот и всё. До отъезда ещё остаётся немного времени, поэтому я решила заглянуть в Заполярный квартал за покупками. Линнея несчастью бывает в Снежнограде. Будет правильно, если я куплю несколько сувениров …
custom 5292027864818917150360custom 536852353016818058594custom 533481082862332392836
Он такой симпатяга, надо было 5🌟 делать ✨
custom 5368523530168180585689custom 538232932458406899685custom 545394595003473036362custom 544045002462436545310
Доброе утро, поздравляю с выходом Снежной 😆 Я сегодня не торопился рано вставать, наоборот выспался, чтобы силы были. Качественное прохождение важнее быстрого! Уже выкрутил Одетту (c 80 крутки) и вам советую, а если гемов не хватает затарьтесь у Donatov.net 👉
custom 5368523530168180585501custom 545394595003473036352custom 538232932458406899637custom 53348108286233239286
Однажды в такой комнате уединились Пульчинелла и Розалина. Они никогда не рассказывали, чем там занимались и о чём говорили, — возможно, об этом вообще никто бы не узнал, если бы не Капитано, случайно заметивший их выходящими из комнаты. Лоефальтер, невозмутимо припудривая носик, шла впереди, а следом за ней плёлся Пульчинелла, послушно неся сумочку дамы.
custom 5334810828623323928900custom 529202786481891715080custom 545394595003473036357custom 53685235301681805857
Я извиняюсь??? Хойо, что с размером описаний у нового сета артефактов? Теперь часто так будет? 😳
custom 5382329324584068996544custom 5334810828623323928257custom 529202786481891715046custom 54539459500347303639
И отдельное большое спасибо донатерам, а ещё трём героям, оформившим подписку на Бусти 🎧 Я уже договорился с arigate, что мы отрисуем персонажей Снежной для стикерпака. В этот раз я не буду устраивать отдельный сбор донатов — заплачу художнице за работу из тех средств, которые вы уже надонатили ❤️
custom 5368523530168180585277custom 538232932458406899619custom 529202786481891715016
Ранее я объявил о проведении конкурса на самые просматриваемые в тикток видео, посвященные хронологии. Пришло время подвести результаты! 😰 0. Мой видос (340к просмотров) 1. Эдит от VIATOR (257к просмотров) 2. Эдит от rmnv (250к просмотров) 3. Эдит от Kuroneko (95к просмотров) Спасибо за ваши видео! Всем троим задоначу по 2000р. Отдельно хочу поблагодарить: Всех остальных, кто снял видео и поддержал мою работу. Сде…
custom 5368523530168180585299custom 538232932458406899649custom 529202786481891715033
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @roit_xd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 542,641 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ройт 🐇” (@roit_xd), 9,830 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/roit_xd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.