Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐˜™๐˜–๐˜๐˜๐˜›๐˜๐˜๐˜๐˜Œ๐˜‹

@rohitified45

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

2,397subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 1,000โ€“3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002057038783
TypeChannel
Username@rohitified45
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rohitified45

Growth

2,3972,3982,397.511 Aug 2026, 13:16 โ€” 2,398 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:26 โ€” 2,397 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:1612 Aug 2026, 09:26
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 2,397โ€“2,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:262,397-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:162,398first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
10.7%
avg views รท 2,397 subscribers
Avg views / post
256
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.54%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 2026 โ€“ 30 July 2026)
Views total2,049
Reactions total93
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค9541.7%
๐Ÿ’ฏ3716.2%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2812.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ2711.8%
๐Ÿ’”2310.1%
โšก156.58%
๐Ÿคฃ20.877%
๐Ÿซก10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 03:12 UTC149 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Seeing Rohit Sharma without a beard after such a long time! ๐Ÿ˜ฏโค๏ธ Rohit Sharma clicked with a fan in London.

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9โค1๐Ÿ’ฏ1

22 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC225 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Finally, slowly but surely, everyone is starting to understand the truth. Rohit Sharmaโ€™s captaincy was never the problem in Tests. The real issue was always Gambhir. Here are Rohitโ€™s Test stats as captain before Gambhir became coach.

โค10

20 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC283 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Rohit Sharma on retirement noise: "Let the noise be there, if there is no noise, there is no fun, my job is inside & there job is outside"

โค11๐Ÿ”ฅ2

19 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC261 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Well Played RO โค๏ธ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿป

โค10

19 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC226 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Guess who is the 1st Indian to hit an ODI 100 AT LORD'S

๐Ÿ”ฅ10โค1

18 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC294 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Rohit Sharma in batting practice session at lord's before final ODI tomorrow.๐Ÿ”ฅ

โค12

17 Jul 2026, 16:10 UTC275 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Everywhere it's the same news about Rohit Sharma's retirement. I'm not getting even 1% hope that he'll continue playing after the Lord's ODI. Politics won. Cricket lost. Thank you, Rohit Sharma, for everything you did for this country ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

๐Ÿ’”9๐Ÿ’ฏ2

16 Jul 2026, 17:43 UTC336 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

2016โ€“2026 ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ’” I've watched him bat so many times over these years, and I still want to watch him bat forever. But God has different plans. Just one last game left. ๐Ÿ’”

๐Ÿ’”14โค1

14 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC262 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Wake up Rohitnation Goat Rohit Sharma will play today ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ

๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ’ฏ1

13 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC288 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Highest score by an Indian captain in T20Is: 121* - Rohit Sharma vs AFG, Bengaluru 2024 118 - Rohit Sharma vs SL, Indore 2017 111* - Rohit Sharma vs WI, Lucknow 2018 100 - Suryakumar Yadav vs SA, JoBurg 2023 94* - Virat Kohli vs WI, Hyderabad 2019 92 - Rohit Sharma vs AUS, Gros Islet 2024 89 - Rohit Sharma vs BAN, Colombo 2018 85 - Rohit Sharma vs BAN, Rajkot 2019 The dominance of Rohit Sharma as T20I captain is unโ€ฆ

โšก6โค3๐Ÿซก1

12 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC241 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Rohit Sharma in ODIs in England โ€” > 1428 Runs in 27 Matches > 7 Hundreds > 65 average at a strike rate of 91 > 150 4s and 32 6s The greatest visiting batter in England ๐Ÿ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ10

11 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC255 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

After a long time seeing both of them together in practice session.

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ9โค1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rohitified45. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Study Materials
@BPSC_UPSC_UPSSSCPET_Quiz ยท 208,760
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐˜™๐˜–๐˜๐˜๐˜›๐˜๐˜๐˜๐˜Œ๐˜‹โ€ (@rohitified45), 2,397 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rohitified45.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.