Погуляли с Саньком пару часов по новым ЖК, сняли видос 🦶
custom 521102753469041155019custom 52111152593974315632

Channel
@rodionokino
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,007subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001440313545 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rodionokino |
| Created | 10 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rodionokino |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 3,007 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 3,004 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 3,002 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 3,002 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (5 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 17,261 |
| Reactions total | 272 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
706 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5211027534690411550 | 336 | 47.6% | |
| custom 5211115259397431563 | 215 | 30.5% | |
| custom 5213312367097569410 | 79 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5210707469432545452 | 76 | 10.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rodionokino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Погуляли с Саньком пару часов по новым ЖК, сняли видос 🦶
custom 521102753469041155019custom 52111152593974315632
Нормальный фильм. Из серии с Томом Холландом — точно лучший, хотя добиться такого статуса было несложно. Первая часть сильно опиралась на харизму Железного человека и ощущалась несамостоятельной, вторая — просто плохая, третья — сплошной фансервис. И вот наконец-то нам дали кино про Человека-паука: без нано-костюмов, без опытных гуру под боком и с какой-никакой драмой. Прикольно, что в экшен-сценах авторы ссылаютс…
custom 521111525939743156327custom 52110275346904115509custom 52107074694325454524
клип в стиле даешь молодежь
custom 521102753469041155023custom 52111152593974315635
Новая работа для Стинта и Братишкина 🤪
custom 521102753469041155030custom 52111152593974315636custom 52107074694325454523
Что думаете про Басту Славы Копейкина?
custom 521070746943254545210custom 52111152593974315634
Кажется у меня есть один претендент... Писать ему.
custom 521070746943254545221custom 52110275346904115506
У Гослинга впереди фильм из вселенной «Звездных войн», а теперь — Marvel. Еще в марте журналисты спрашивали актера, что он думает о предложенной роли. Он назвал ситуацию «сложной». Очень интересно. Вероятно, дело в том, что контракт с Marvel Studios подразумевает энное количество картин, связывая руки актеру на многие годы вперед. Но, видимо, есть сумма, от которой невозможно отказаться. Наконец-то Кевин Файги наш…
custom 521111525939743156322custom 52110275346904115507
Кэпа что-то поплавило конкретно.
custom 521102753469041155015custom 52107074694325454527
Вот и он 🇺🇸
custom 521102753469041155015custom 52111152593974315636
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 521102753469041155020custom 52111152593974315638custom 52107074694325454523
Одиссея нормальный фильм. Первый фильм на эту тематику после Трои, который просто интересно смотреть, несмотря на то, что это древнекаловый эпос. Мэтт Деймон неплох. Джеки Чан в эпизоде вообще супер. Нголо Канте нормально злобную рожу корчила, даже неважно, что она черная, да и баба, кстати, ниче такая. Ну и ее цвет кожи оправдан в целом. Эллиота Пейджа мало, но прикольно было увидеть его на большом экране. Все-таки …
custom 521102753469041155031custom 52107074694325454522
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 521111525939743156352custom 521070746943254545218
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @rodionokino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 346,895 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Родион о кино” (@rodionokino), 3,007 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodionokino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.