Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 3 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 04:21
1
-108
27 Aug 2026, 08:52
109
+12
21 Aug 2026, 03:08
97
+1
15 Aug 2026, 01:05
96
-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:47
97
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:36
97
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58m 46s
Average length
58m 46s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
313 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
79
25.2%
custom 5440679556266613976
59
18.8%
👍
52
16.6%
custom 5471952986970267163
32
10.2%
🤝
31
9.90%
custom 5413397322707002602
14
4.47%
custom 5467891257873289677
12
3.83%
😁
11
3.51%
🕊
8
2.56%
custom 5469628731058310542
7
2.24%
⚡
7
2.24%
❤
1
0.319%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rodion_way. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я заработал $11 000 за июль
многие считают, что прибыль это то же самое, что оборотка
Но реальный доход складывается из того, сколько денег у тебя осталось на руках чистыми, во что ты их вложил, сколько тебе пришлось для этого усилий и энергии потратить
Круто, конечно, купить последний айфон
но намного важнее сейчас вкладывать в себя
и создавать капитал
В бизнесе (асобенна в инфабизноси) очень удобно прятаться…
🤬 вы зае**ли учиться
чтобы зарабатывать онлайн, не нужно учиться годами
большинство навыков осваиваются не через годы теории, а через практику
долго учиться сейчас = отставать
Мир меняется быстрее, чем ты готовишься, поэтому в эту гонку так выиграть попросту невозможно
почти в любой сфере достаточно базового понимания, чтобы начать действовать
к сожалению, большинство людей вместо того, чтобы действовать и учи…
Ценность общения
Мы часто забываем,
насколько на самом деле ценно общаться с другими людьми
и чем именно полезна эта коммуникация
каждый человек проживает свою уникальную жизнь
работал в какой-то нише
строил бизнес
прожил интересный и необычный опыт
кто-то прочитал 500 книг
и каждый пришёл к своим осознаниям
любой человек имеет свой особый взгляд на мир (уникальный)
Когда мы общаемся,
мы эффективно обме…
Смотри, я за $1000 хотел квартиру снять
Думал, ну, ещё ПОСИДИМ, поищем аналоги
Или поторгуюсь до $900-950
ФИГНЯ
Если ты хочешь 15к долл делать
То твой час бодрствования должен стоить 30 баксов!!!
Это блин 480 долл в день
Каждый абсолютно день
Выходной
Рабочий
Часы, когда ты ешь и гуляешь...
Они стоят 30$ = 480 долл в день, не считая время на сон
Потратив день на поиск «более дешёвого варианта и тд»
Ты уп…
😼 Хоба!
уже месяц не пишу сюда
И понял кое-что важное..
Предыстория
У меня основной канал пробил 1000 подписчиков
Но там снизилось вовлечение
Я проводил перепись, поднимал актив, но не помогло
решил начать с чистого листа
новый канал
собрал тут самых активных
лично принимал каждую заявку, чтобы были только целевые люди
И давал ценные проверенные знания
читай > внедряй > получай результат
…
❤🔥9👍8🤝7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rodion_way. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“rodion_way” (@rodion_way), 1 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rodion_way.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
