Channel
@robours
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,072subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001415204423 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robours |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robours |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 1,072 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 1,074 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 1,075 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,076 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 1,076 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
75 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 56 | 74.7% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2025 to 30 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام دوستان عزیز با توجه به اطمینان ما از شرایط سرمایهگذاری در بورس، ۵ سبد بالای ۵۰۰ میلیون تومان پذیرفته میشه اگر علاقمند هستید سبدگردانی بورستون رو ما انجام بدیم، به آیدی زیر پیام دهید: @bourspppp پرسود باشید
به به زمین هفت تیر شرکت ناب #غناب پروانه ساخت عالی هم داره و الان اومد روی کدال چه برای فروش، چه برای ساخت و مشارکت این زمین عالیه و میتونه سود خوبی به سهامدار برسونه. @robours @roboursgp
👍4
تصویر گویاست! ۴ نفر سهم ۳۱ رو خریدن در #غناب قدرت خریدار تقریبا ۷ برابر فروشندگان؛ پولهای درشت بی دلیل وارد یک سهم نمیشن @robours @roboursgp
👍2
#غناب از اون صف خریدها که مثلا پروژه نشده و قرار نیست دو سه برابر بشه 😁 @robours @roboursgp
❤5👍1
خزعبلات یک کانال بورسی! یه عمر با استفاده از بورسیها عضو بگیری و بعد بری تبلیغ بالا رفتن قیمت دلار و طلا و جنگ رو بکنی! چرا؟ چون دوزار طلا یا دلار خریدی! ننگ بر تو بشر دوزاری! بالا رفتن قیمت دلار خیلی از مردم رو نابود میکنه رسماً! حالا فعلا تتر ۷۸ تومنی رو تحویل بگیر تا بعد! جنازهی احمق و وطن فروش پینوشت: ما هم تتر داریم اما در به در دنبال بالا رفتن قیمت تتر نیستیم چون میدونیم ارزش سرمایه مردم میاد پایین @robours…
👍8
زمانی که هیچ نشانهای نبود گفتیم #غناب روند صعودی جدیدی شروع کرده حالا کم کم بقیه دارن نشانه ها رو میبینند خریدهای حقوقی و اردرهای خرید سنگین و احتمالا بزودی صف های خرید سنگین #غناب سابقه صفهای خرید طولانی و سنگین رو داره فکر نوسانگیری هم در روند صعودی این سهم نباشید چون قطعا جا میمونید اخبار عالی هم از شرکت ادامه دار خواهد بود. @robours @roboursgp
👍4
قاب پایانی #غناب حجم عالی نیم درصد شرکت امروز معامله شد قدرت خریدار دو و نیم برابر فروشندگان ۲۳ خرید حقوقی سه و نیم درصد بالاتر از پایانی بسته شد زور فروشندگان به خریدار نرسید @robours @roboursgp
❤4
۳۵ میلیون خریدار در مقابل چند میلیون جزیی فروشنده صفر تابلو هم بسته شده یعنی وقتی فروختی دیگه نمیذارن برگردی به همون قیمت بخری سهام ارزندهتون رو از دست ندید @robours @roboursgp
❤5
پیشگو هستم اینم نمونه کارم پیام دیروز و روند امروز #غناب در روند صعودی دنبال نوسانگیری نباشید حمایت عالی حقوقی رو هم ببینید با ۲۲ میلیون خرید @robours @roboursgp
👍5
🎥ترامپ: دیدارهای خیلی خوبی با ایران داشتیم 🔹️رئیسجمهور آمریکا امروز از روند گفتوگوها با ایران ابراز رضایت کرد و گفت برای قدم های بعدی نیاز به زمان هست آلن ایر، سخنگوی وزارت خارجه آمریکا در دوره مذاکرات برجام: در بحث مذاکرات ایران و آمریکا تا اینجا همهچیز خوب پیش رفته؛ توافق قابل دستیابی است و بهمراتب بهتر از گزینههای جایگزین است؛ سرعت مذاکرات اهمیت دارد/اقتصاد آنلاین ✅🔴 باحرفهای دیروز عصر پریزیدنت ترامپ و سیگ…
دوستان سلام در خصوص #غناب فردا خیلی بعیده مشکلی باشه تعمدی تو صف فروش امروز نبوده و از فردا اگر اتفاق عجیب و غریبی رخ نده، روند صعودی برمیگرده 😉 @robours @roboursgp
👍4
تبلیغات تلگرام رو به هیچ عنوان عضو نشید! اگر شدید فردا نندازید گردن ما! تبلیغات اسمش روشه! دست ما نیست! در ۹۹ درصد موارد هم دروغه
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @robours. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 293,976 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رو بورس” (@robours), 1,072 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robours.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.